Iulian

Please point to me as a myopic fool, as you just generalized all Sony shooters. I am one Sony shooter. I started with Sony A200 and Nex5N. Went through 2 years of Fuji XE1 and X100s, with good primes (14, 35, 56) Sold them all after 1 week with Sony A7 and Planar ZM 50/2. Now I have A7ii, 35/2.8, 55/1.8 and Batis 85/1.8, as native lenses. I created a user account to this forum only to reply to your 2 stupid (yes, stupid) sentences: - Sony encourages you to use zoom lenses - where the hell did this come from? If you would have used any of the primes, you would have shut up. You said about 55/1.8 but I cannot believe it - a clear lie. You have never used it. To compare the 55/1.8 and Fuji 35/1.4 and put them in the same class... Don't compare FF primes from Sony range to Fuji APCS primes. They are simply no match. Not better or worse, but for different scopes. To sustain that Fuji lenses are superior to Sony... based on what? I can clearly say that the Sony 55/1.8 has absolutely no equivalent in Fuji range, as well as Batis 85/1.8. We can debate, but reality is this. Sony FF primes are top lenses. Period. Expensive? For sure. But, if you cannot afford them, why bad words? Live with what you afford. - Sony users are myopic fools. I felt offended enough just to reply to your post. I had Fuji for 2 years and they are good looking cameras. But they are not better than Sony. Fuji has good lenses. But they are not better than Sony. Fuji has a better lens range. Really? Have you seen the available native lenses for Sony? Produced by Sony, Zeiss, Voigtlander, Samyang, so on. Are they big? Some of them, yes - and heavy too. But you envy them, don't you?...