Jump to content

TaffyTheGog

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    2

  • Joined

  • Last visited

TaffyTheGog's Achievements

Newbie

Newbie (1/14)

  • First Post
  • Reacting Well
  • Week One Done
  • One Month Later
  • One Year In

Recent Badges

1

Reputation

  1.    kimcarsons reacted to a post in a topic: Mitakon, Metabones, Roxsen, Camdiox, focal reducers, share your experiences.
  2.    TaffyTheGog reacted to a post in a topic: Mitakon, Metabones, Roxsen, Camdiox, focal reducers, share your experiences.
  3. TaffyTheGog
    I love how gear snobs will chime in completely missing the point of 'any experience with LESS EXPENSIVE focal reducers' just to say they like Metabones, regardless whether they've only ever used Metabones and therefore CANNOT answer the question, at all, even remotely. I am personally curious about the Adplo and like focal reducers. Anyone? And please do not use the word Metabones in your reply - I can barely afford my camera, let alone a horribly overpriced accessory.
  4.    TaffyTheGog reacted to a post in a topic: Mitakon, Metabones, Roxsen, Camdiox, focal reducers, share your experiences.
  5.    TaffyTheGog reacted to a post in a topic: Mitakon, Metabones, Roxsen, Camdiox, focal reducers, share your experiences.
  6. TaffyTheGog
    I'm curious - how many people out there would like to see PROPER manual lenses in the X-range? Imagine the 56mm, 35/1.4, and a host of other fast primes, fully manual (not focus-by-wire), weather-sealed (or not), made by Fuji and costing half or a third as much. That would definitely get me buying Fuji X-glass. As it stands, I am a film convert and really prefer to shoot tactile legacy glass, but if Fuji's lenses were actually proper manual and built specifically for the system, well, that'd be tha shiznit. Anyone else have similar thoughts?
×
×
  • Create New...