[The Last Kaizen: imagine Fuji would, for a last time, release a FW update for older X-series cameras. Which 2 features would you like to get?]

Classic Chrome emulation

Agfachrome CT-18 (60-70's East German version) sometimes known also as ORWO CT-18 emulation

[Fujifilm X-T2 coming pretty soon after the Fujfilm X-PRO2 (source right in the past)]

Very Very doubtful Fuji would use Sony or anyone else for their sensor(s). I was a long time EEE doing machine control & robotics high speed high accuracy vision system work. We partnered with Fuji. I can say their engineering and semiconductor (which is after all what our beloved ¨visible light translation ¨sensors are) manufacturing is the finest in the World. Yes, they are part of a partnership R&D project with Oly. just as much of the high resolution sensor tech. for weather satellite - solar corona research is in fact Fuji- Mitsubishi joint development.  Ah, also in my past an aerial mapping photographer where Fuji did some wonderful camera-lens work as well as do very advanced SLAR, remote sensitometry, and magnetometer stuff. ;-) 

[Lightroom 6 improvements?]

Actually, I really never could or will understand why anyone would want to bother with any software Fuji does not supply? After all they absolutely know their equipment better than ANY external ¨engineer¨ could. I was an E. E. E. for many years (after some years Aerial Mapping photog.) building and installing machine control imaging systems. We partnered with Fuji for those camera-lens systems...........believe me THEY KNOW!

 But then again I never had any use for adobe even in early UNIX days. ;-)

[Image Stabilization]

I think It's a misnomer to say IS gets in the way of letting you capture what you see. It's another tool in the toolbox, and allows you to capture what you see under more situations. You can always turn it off if you don't like it, but you can't turn it on when it's not there.

Okay, point truly taken.  However I certainly would not pay anything to have it.  

[Image Stabilization]

If I'd wanted those toys or needed them I'd have bought a toy camera. 

Seriously though, I simply could NOT care less if IS is on-board the camera. Even less do I want my optics attached to servo motor dither control algorithms or other software based ¨correction-enhancement¨ gimmicks.

Simply allow me to capture what I see, none more, nothing less. 

 But then again I'm an old Aerial Mapping photog. with great dislike for excess tinker toy stuff anyway. ;-)