romain

organic sensor doesn't seem to be on its way in a near future. larger sensor. I doubt it considering what has been inversted in the X-mount system + FF will become less and less justified in real world photography (regarding sensor's evolution) So my guess is still an improved generation (X-pro 2, XT-2...) with a new sensor, EXR III ... and it's perfectly fine to me. As far as the X30 successor, the more realistic would be a 1 inch X-trans sensor (wish they could implement a 24-100 2-2.8 zoom) and that also would be perfect. I understand certain people wanting to have medium format and square sensors, but when you look at Pentax Z645, ok it kick ass shooting charts, but you have a sliding aperture zoom and a fixed lens that's only 2.8 (therefore you're losing 2 stops compared to a 1.4 fujinon) oh I almost forgot, it's 9.000 fu.... dollars!

XT-2 for me. evf is great on the XT-1, can only be better on its successor. OVF can be nice now and then but price difference will be too important for a "gadget". I don't mean to be insulting by that, but it would be a gadget for me.

I think that a X100 with a zoom would have a pretty big lens (if fast) or would be slower to keep a decent size don't you think? a 1 inch x-trans sensor in a X30 instead. what do you say?

af on an xt-1 works fine if you use it in good lighting conditions without the macro mode on, but not great otherwise. I can live with it till it's replaced though

I don't want/need a larger sensor. I'm not in need for an exotic camera. an XT-1 with a 20mpx x-trans sensor (we can imagine a 1 stop improvment in image quality over the previous generation) with an improved af system, 8-9 fps with a good buffer and exr III, improved evf in high contrast situation and low light situation. but this is just the logical evolution of the camera. what I'd like to see is a little larger grip in order to implement a larger battery (500 shots would be nice), more clicky and bumpy 4 way buttons, a more solid sd card slot door aaaaaand... a 5 axis stab (like sony a7 II or oly em1 and 5) to me, such a camera would kill the interest of any FF. here's why. 1- definition is way enough for 99% of the photographers. 2- since the new firmware will increase af sensitivity to 0,5 ev, a brand new af system would probably go above 0 (that's more a dslr vs hybrid argument) 3- 6400 isos would give very good results (I guess same as XT-1 at 3200) should I even mention size, weight and price of the gear? oh I almost forgot. same stuff for a X200.