jschoonj

So I guess we can just say there's more people out there on YouTube who have a X-T2 and know less about how to handle video, than for example people with an a6300 who often buy that camera exclusively for video. I hope a lot of video people start to pick up Fuji for video and we see some killer stuff come out. Even out of their own promo for the GFX which was all filmed with the X-T2, only the bit with the Turkish photographer in the snow had that cinematic look. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Thanks for your comment! I am looking to grade (or have some grading done) so I hope internal FLog will come with the next upgrade. Some part of it is down to color although I have noticed using some of the film settings with values down does help. Looking forward to owning my X-T2 and trying it all out for myself! Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Thanks for this! Part of it is of course color grading, but also how movement in the video feels like. I have the feeling most people who put up Fuji X-T2 4K footage have that horrible "motion-flow 120hz" look. Probably just down to not shooting in 24/25p with correct shutter speeds I guess. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Def not interested in the Philip Bloom look [emoji3]. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Hi everyone, I've been looking into buying my first digital camera these past few weeks (currently still doing stills on 35mm film) and I really like everything I'm seeing from the X-T2. One of the main reasons I'm buying a digital camera is to do some video work as well. While looking at some X-T2 footage on YouTube and Vimeo I noticed in a whole it's a lot less filmic than say the Sony a6300. Now what do you guys think this is due to? Smaller user base for video (so the style I like is just not out there), lack of internal FLog capabilities, ... Or is it really somehow a technical thing that makes X-T2 video look more like video and less like film? Looking forward to your insights! Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk