Hello team, long time reader first time poster.
I am an enthusiast user with only 6 years of experience and mostly Nikon gear.
Have been shooting X-Pro 1 since May 2012, really like the skin tone rendering of Pro Neg, always use OOC JPEG.
Was wondering if I should upgrade to X-Pro 2 - mainly because my wife complains about the Fuji always taking too long to focus.
Been reading up on the reviews but still not clear how the JPEG engine / X-Trans of the new batch (XT1, XT10, XE2 and not XP2) compares to the old X-Pro 1? Can you approximate X-Pro 1 output by playing with the H/S settings? Has anybody seen a side-by-side review of photos of same subject done by both cameras?
I got myself the X100S back in the day but sold it after 3 months for the XF23mm as the photos had weird contrast..
Many thanks in advance for the info, promise to be more active from now on...
Hello team, long time reader first time poster. I am an enthusiast user with only 6 years of experience and mostly Nikon gear. Have been shooting X-Pro 1 since May 2012, really like the skin tone rendering of Pro Neg, always use OOC JPEG. Was wondering if I should upgrade to X-Pro 2 - mainly because my wife complains about the Fuji always taking too long to focus. Been reading up on the reviews but still not clear how the JPEG engine / X-Trans of the new batch (XT1, XT10, XE2 and not XP2) compares to the old X-Pro 1? Can you approximate X-Pro 1 output by playing with the H/S settings? Has anybody seen a side-by-side review of photos of same subject done by both cameras? I got myself the X100S back in the day but sold it after 3 months for the XF23mm as the photos had weird contrast.. Many thanks in advance for the info, promise to be more active from now on...
