enthawizeguy

I am just comparing the photo's on flickr from the fuji xt1 to the a7ii and i don't see many on par with it. I have narrowed it down to two options I can get the a7ii body kit with the 28-70mm lens xt1 with the pancake or 35mm sense. They are both going to be around the same price. I personally would like to drop 400 more and get the a7ii with the zeiss 35 but i don't know if i should eat into my funds like that. I'm torn i have spent 36 hours trying to decide.

I want a better camera and over all the a7ii seems the best option where I won't have to upgrade for a while and is on park with the canon mk3. I want something with high iso good for low light and a good all around camera. Yes the lenses are expensive that is the only problem.

ya i just think i want a full frame... a7 or a7ii.... i don't know... u can use other lenses on the sony as well with a converter

i cant decide blech

Ya after going to the store I might be leaning more towards the Sony A7 but not sure if i should go with the older A7 or the A72 kit. Otherwise it will be the xt1

The only thing i am really worried about with the xt 10 is that the iso dial isn't on top and the buffer is small and not good for fast shots.

So 1. i really like the x100t but it only has one lense ( is this going to limit me a lot) 2. should i go with the xt 10 or t1 with the same sense that the 100t comes with and maybe another so i can switch lenses and have more options. 3. i will probably rule out the x pro 2 if its going to be 1800 for the body. I am looking to spend no more than 1600.

mainly i want to make sure I'm getting a camera where i can take pictures of nature (mountains, mist, birds), (models and maybe some headshot type stuff like in my profile pic) and street photography especially at night.

i meant sense size... sorry i have been up all night looking at stuff about to go to sleep..... if i go with the 100t am i severely limiting myself and going to need another camera sooner or am i better off wit xt10 or t1 and with 28mm lense?

I thought about the xt10 but i wanted the iso as a manual switch so i could get used to doing that without fiddling through menu's and figured it would help with learning. I also was told the xt 10 has a low burst buffer. Should i totally rule out the x100t ? If the x pro 2 is gonna be closer to 1800 i can check that off my list but the x100t, xt 1 and xt10 are all doable and with what sense do you recommend i start with?

Low light (high iso) and portable are the biggest things but i also don't want to have to buy a new body anytime soon. Id rather invest in a good camera now. I had a nikon d90 in the past but due to life problems i sold it.

Right now I am leaning towards the x100t, xt1 or x10.... i really like the x100t but am i gonna be screwed since it only has one built in lense? I can spend a little more since amazon just approved me for 800 dollar credit when i was looking at cameras. Are the X Pro's in line with the X100 and XT1 tho? s

Hi guys, I am new here. Just getting back into photography and wanted to go with a smaller camera than a dslr since i am more likely to take it around with me. I am just learning. I liked the fuji cause most of the controls are right on top and its mirrorless and smaller. I was pretty set between the x100t and xt1 but than I saw the x pro 2 is coming out in a couple days. Is that line better or comparable. I don't want to have to upgrade anytime soon and would like to get something pretty good. My interests. Street Photography Nature Photography Model Photography I am hoping to purchase one either tomorrow or this week when the Pro 2 goes on sale. So any help is greatly appreciated. I don't want to make the wrong choice. Also if you guys have suggestions of cameras other than these feel free to chime in.