Jump to content

rakosky

Members
  • Posts

    6
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by rakosky

  1. On 4/23/2021 at 10:56 AM, Herco said:

    You're quite right. I too keep hold of my X-Pro2 and returned the X-Pro3 after I tried it for personal work for a week. I don't miss the D-pad (I use the joystick), but I do wish the X-Pro3 had the LCD of the X100V. One point of correction: the EVF does work with all focal lengths. It's just the OVF that is restricted (even compared to the X-Pro2). Actually, Fuji launched the 18mm f1.4 recently and they used the X-Pro3 as the launch model for it. However, the X-Pro3 in OVF-mode doesn't even have framelines for the 18mm. Such a miss for a street photography camera...

    Could be that the 18mm framelines are actually the borders or the ovf? I read this somewhere.

  2.  

    On 5/13/2019 at 11:38 AM, lleo said:

    Same construction, different results. Here it is: https://www.fuji-x-forum.com/topic/5770-35mm-comparison/
    Saying that the f/2 is superior to the f/1,4 it means lying. Anyways, this particular sample. Another one might be better.
    Lenses are assembled by hand and not two are identical. That's why I always compare two or more, if available at the shop, before to buy it.
    I've been doing this through the last... probably 30 years or more. And it always worked.
    By the way, in the new series it seems that the better ones are the 23 and the 50. The 35 is the weaker one.

    23 f2 quite better of 23 1.4 is laughly.

×
×
  • Create New...