Jump to content

hambern

Members
  • Posts

    9
  • Joined

  • Last visited

hambern's Achievements

  1. Well... I don't know about you but i can't even come near the look of DR400 by editing a DR100-image. DR100 blows way to much highlights in my opinion. I almost always use DR Auto or DR400 in really bright light. By the way. The best settings i've found by far so far is: Dynamic Range- Auto Film Simulation- Pro Neg Std White Balance- Custom Color- +1 Sharpness- 0 Highlight Tone- -1 Shadow Tone- -1 Noise Reduction- 0 It gives a lot of possibilities for editing. But iw you want it really flat. Try: Dynamic Range- DR400 Film Simulation- Pro Neg Std White Balance- Custom Color- 0 Sharpness- 0 Highlight Tone- -2 Shadow Tone- -2 Noise Reduction- 0
  2. So I upgraded from X100 to X-T10. And I'm disappointed. What has happened to the Film Simulations? Almost everyone of them is completely useless. The colors are not distinct, they seem to lack nuances, I get at blurry smeared feeling ant not that vibrant, precise and clear colors i got out of my X100. And worst of all: The X-T10 always clips the shadows, carving black holes in the picture. I first noticed this when i edited pictures I've taken on a baptism lately. Most men were wearing black suits. And the suits completely dissapeared in huge black spots. It was allmost impossible to drag at least some details out from the shadows. A problem I've never had with my X100 who naturally and gradualy fades out the shadows in a beautiful way. So I set up a test to try to mimic the X100 Provia colors. This was the X100 shot: As you can see. The brown fur looks completely natural. I used DR200 and Provia Standard settings. You can almost touch and feel it. The smoothness... It's a fur, and it shows. Also notice the warm redish brown tone to the teak-chair. Completely true to life. Beutiful. With the same standard Provia settings on my X-T10 i get this: Look at those black areas in the fur! Looks real? Still DR200. No. Looks touchable? No. It looks terrible. And the warm redish brown in the chair is completely gone. Replaced with a unreal orange-brown color. Not true to life. So i switched color mode. Everything was wore except Pro Negative Standard. After adding +2 to colors I get a much better fur. But now we get other problems... The nice saturated colors on the child book is now quite dull. Not as all as vibrant and pure as in real life. And the chair. Still that strange orange tone. But a huge improvement from the X-T10 Provia no doubt. Finally i tried replicating the X100 colors from the RAW file in Aperture and got quite a bit closer. What I did was to open the raw file, recover in the highlights +1 EV and adjusted the black point, down -0,3. That's it. The rest is due to Aperture. The fur is now much more real and the colors are more vibrant. The pinkish text on the book is now almost red, which is not true to live. Still I prefer this in front of the Pro Negative Standard, color +2 image. But I'm still not happy. I really miss my old X100 colors and I can't seem to reproduce them. Anyone else out there that has noticed the same thing. What do you do? Do we all have to start using 30+ MB Raw files all sudden??
  3. hambern

    X100 vs X-T10

    Trying to emulate X100 Provia colors on X-T10
  4. I've gotten my X-T10 now. And I have to say I'm quite a bit dissapointed of the Film Simulation Modes on it. To my eyes, they are all pretty useless. None of them even comes close to the colors i got from my good old X100. I have to develop Raw files in Aperture and tweak quite a bit to get some of what i got out before. Will this be adressed in future firmware updates? This makes my X-T10 a worse camera than my old X100
×
×
  • Create New...