Jump to content

Lens for X-T2


MariuszG

Recommended Posts

Hello. I would like to buy a lens for camera Fuji x-t2.
The lens is intended for taking pictures at parties and events where is very little light.
So it has to be fast and accurate autofocus.
What can you recommend me?
The budget what I have for it is about 500-600 dollars

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • MariuszG changed the title to Lens for X-T2

I was thinking about it: Fujifilm XF 16-55mm f2.8 LM R WR (secondhand)
Is this a good choice?
or is it better to have an adapter with electronic transmission and some good lens from the Canon system?

the best option was a Sigma lens 18-35mm f1.8,
but the cost of the autofocus adapter and the lens itself is far beyond my financial capabilities.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

As so many others have said, for basic use it's quite the deal (as a kit or separate purchase) to get the 18-55mm (2.8-4 f)
For critical work in pro applications, maybe the 16-55mm is needed/worthwhile.
FWIW, I've been using several lenses for a few years now (both tele for birds and this lens for "street", shedding the grip I use with longer lenses or shoots).
And this lens really rocks for me, certainly at the sizes I print and resolution I post at online.
Not only that, it's almost miraculous what it can do in near darkness.  The camera itself - with high sensitivity and ability to boost exposure in several ways - nicely pairs with this "kit lens".

Just because I have a very recent example which I enjoy sharing, here's New York City 2 weeks ago, in a complete power failure "blackout".
With this lens, not only did I get some amazing images (so I'm told) with the natural existing light (headlights and food trucks), but I actually - with a wide-angle in New York, unheard of! - captured sharp images that night of a full moon, planets, red star, and constellation. Hand-held! (ISO 10,000).   So, IMM, no need to go beyond this lens for things like you list, parties, low-light situations (with far greater light than a total pitch-black power failure).

Samples - with X-T2 and 18-55mm:
Still photos:  http://www.fenichel.com/blackout19.shtml
Video:  http://bit.ly/NYCblackout19

Good luck! 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also, you mention autofocus and adapters to other lenses. While there are some VERY expensive adapters that claim to work with Fuji cameras, prepare for disappointment. If you depend on autofocus and/or auto aperture, stick with Fuji or Zeiss Touit lenses - they will "talk" to your camera. If you shoot full manual, adapt away!!! :) 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Because the sensor assembly is moved electrmagnetically. When there is no power it is essentially free moving.
    • Ahoy ye hearties! Hoist ye yon Jolly Roger and Cascade away. NGC 1502 The Jolly Roger Cluster:

      Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

      Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

      This is the equivalent of 43 minutes, 40 seconds of exposure. NGC 1502 is a neat little cluster located in the Camelopardalis Constellation. This region of space was thought to be fairly empty by early astronomers, but as you can see, there is a lot there. Kemble's Cascade (a.k.a. Kemble 1) is named for Father Lucian Kemble, a Canadian Franciscan friar who wrote about it to Walter Scott Houston, an author for the Sky And Telescope magazine. Houston named the asterism for Fr. Kemble and the name "stuck". NGC 1501 is the Oyster Nebula. A longer focal length telescope is needed to bring this one into good viewing range, but it is well worth the effort. NGC 1502: https://skyandtelescope.org/online-gallery/ngc-1502/ Camelopardalis Constellation: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Camelopardalis Kemble's Cascade (and NGC 1501: The Oyster Nebula): https://www.constellation-guide.com/kembles-cascade/ Arrrrrr Matey.
    • Looking for input; there are some decent deals and might want to take advantage to expand my lenses for my 100s already own: 110/2 32-64 35-70 100-200 + TC   Shooting mostly family shots, bringing my kit to capture family outings indoors and out. Tracking the 63/43 effective FLs on the two, but has anybody used both? Would the 55 (covered by two zooms right now) be redundant? Would the 80 be too similar in character to my 110 for portraiture?
    • See what I mean? Two instantaneous ads. Worthless.   
×
×
  • Create New...