Jump to content

Windows 10 sd card content not visible

GreyGhost
 Share

Recommended Posts

GreyGhost Newbie

GreyGhost

Posted
Posted

Hi,

 

Just upgraded to Windows 10 from Windows 7 and I am not able to see the content of my SDcard when connecting the X-E2 to the computer via USB. When I take out the card and put it in a card reader or when I connect the X-E2 to my other Windows 7 PC the content is visible.

 

The camera gets recognized as X-E2 under both Windows 7 and 10 and is visible in windows explorer.

 

Anybody with similar problems? or even a solution :-)

 

Regards!

Link to post
Share on other sites
Patrick FR Veteran

Patrick FR

Posted
Posted

Notice of Compatibility of Digital Cameras and Application Software with Microsoft Windows10.
July 29, 2015

We are checking the compatibility of the digital cameras and the application software mentioned below with Microsoft Windows10. Once we complete the check, we will inform you of its result.

http://www.fujifilm.com/news/n150729_01.html

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 3 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...
asathor Enthusiast

asathor

Posted
Posted

Aside from the firmware there are two parts to this problem (actually 3: who install Win 10 except by mistake). Most Importantly Fuji does not allow renaming of folders except if you remove the card from the camera and second the camera cannot read folders it did not create. Personally I remove the card and rename "The Catch of the Day" by date (like) 2015-11-05 etc. this naming sorts alpha-numerically so it is very practical. But after that the camera can't see the folder - it sucks either way - 2000 images in one folder or images you can't review!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • BobJ
      X-T5 Cleaning Mistake

      By BobJ · Posted

      Because the sensor assembly is moved electrmagnetically. When there is no power it is essentially free moving.
    • jerryy
      Astro-photography (open thread)

      By jerryy · Posted

      Ahoy ye hearties! Hoist ye yon Jolly Roger and Cascade away. NGC 1502 The Jolly Roger Cluster:

      Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

      Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

      This is the equivalent of 43 minutes, 40 seconds of exposure. NGC 1502 is a neat little cluster located in the Camelopardalis Constellation. This region of space was thought to be fairly empty by early astronomers, but as you can see, there is a lot there. Kemble's Cascade (a.k.a. Kemble 1) is named for Father Lucian Kemble, a Canadian Franciscan friar who wrote about it to Walter Scott Houston, an author for the Sky And Telescope magazine. Houston named the asterism for Fr. Kemble and the name "stuck". NGC 1501 is the Oyster Nebula. A longer focal length telescope is needed to bring this one into good viewing range, but it is well worth the effort. NGC 1502: https://skyandtelescope.org/online-gallery/ngc-1502/ Camelopardalis Constellation: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Camelopardalis Kemble's Cascade (and NGC 1501: The Oyster Nebula): https://www.constellation-guide.com/kembles-cascade/ Arrrrrr Matey.
    • Greybeard
      Only comments are baited ads

      By Greybeard · Posted

    • BIGOAK
      55 or 80?

      By BIGOAK · Posted

      Looking for input; there are some decent deals and might want to take advantage to expand my lenses for my 100s already own: 110/2 32-64 35-70 100-200 + TC   Shooting mostly family shots, bringing my kit to capture family outings indoors and out. Tracking the 63/43 effective FLs on the two, but has anybody used both? Would the 55 (covered by two zooms right now) be redundant? Would the 80 be too similar in character to my 110 for portraiture?
    • Fotomatt
      Only comments are baited ads

      By Fotomatt · Posted

      See what I mean? Two instantaneous ads. Worthless.   
×
×
  • Create New...