Jump to content

Very strange aperture behaviour XT3


Recommended Posts

Hello!

So, I'm trying to understand if this strange behaviour of the XT3 is a bug or if this is intentional and has actually some reason behind it. It's a little hard to explain, so bear with me here!

For some reason, the only time this happens is when the SHUTTER SPEED is set to AUTO. If I set the shutter to any number, let's say 1/60, then the aperture stays still.

So, I'm setting the aperture to a fixed number, like f2. But when I move my câmera, depending on what amount of light it's receiving, the aperture starts opening and closing by itself. Note: I'm not touching anything, not pressing ANY button, just moving the camera around. So as the example, let's say I set the lens to f2. Sure, when I half press the shutter, the lens goes straight to f2 and my picture is fine. But before I press anything, the aperture keeps changing, f2, f8, f11, f2.8, f4....It's like it's changing to keep a good preview of the image? But this sucks, because while I'm framing (not pressing any button), the deph of field keeps changing and changing, until I half press the shutter and it stops where it should.

Also another problem with this: let's say I'm just walking around with the camera turned on, strapped around my neck. It will keep changing the aperture, draining battery, and wearing out the lens while I'm not even looking at the screen!!

I know this is very hard to understand, so I recorded a video to demonstrate. The first video is the crazy aperture moving by itself. (Again, I'm not pressing ANYTHING, just moving the camera. The lens is set to wide open f2)
https://drive.google.com/open?id=1-wo72nNMlACZXscDANDvRm34LIZfSga1

And the second video is just to show what the camera is seeing from behind.
https://drive.google.com/open?id=1-6yM0_7B5yBcrr4lt7Df7Bf7hEyZvdX1

Does anyone has a clue about it? A common behaviour? A bug?

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Ahoy ye hearties! Hoist ye yon Jolly Roger and Cascade away. NGC 1502 The Jolly Roger Cluster:

      Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

      Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

      This is the equivalent of 43 minutes, 40 seconds of exposure. NGC 1502 is a neat little cluster located in the Camelopardalis Constellation. This region of space was thought to be fairly empty by early astronomers, but as you can see, there is a lot there. Kemble's Cascade (a.k.a. Kemble 1) is named for Father Lucian Kemble, a Canadian Franciscan friar who wrote about it to Walter Scott Houston, an author for the Sky And Telescope magazine. Houston named the asterism for Fr. Kemble and the name "stuck". NGC 1501 is the Oyster Nebula. A longer focal length telescope is needed to bring this one into good viewing range, but it is well worth the effort. NGC 1502: https://skyandtelescope.org/online-gallery/ngc-1502/ Camelopardalis Constellation: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Camelopardalis Kemble's Cascade (and NGC 1501: The Oyster Nebula): https://www.constellation-guide.com/kembles-cascade/ Arrrrrr Matey.
    • Looking for input; there are some decent deals and might want to take advantage to expand my lenses for my 100s already own: 110/2 32-64 35-70 100-200 + TC   Shooting mostly family shots, bringing my kit to capture family outings indoors and out. Tracking the 63/43 effective FLs on the two, but has anybody used both? Would the 55 (covered by two zooms right now) be redundant? Would the 80 be too similar in character to my 110 for portraiture?
    • See what I mean? Two instantaneous ads. Worthless.   
    • What's the deal Fuji X Forum? I'm noticing there are seldom replies to any topics - except for advertisements posted as replies. Really lame. Anyone else noticing the only reply they receive to a question is an advert?  🤠 fotomatt in Colorado  
×
×
  • Create New...