Jump to content

NOW OR NEVER: Terrific Fujifilm X-H1 Deal is Ending and Rebates on Fujifilm X-T3, X-T2 and GFX50R


Fuji X Rumors

Recommended Posts

Fujifilm Deals Ending To check-out, or not to check-out, that is the question! If in the last few weeks you were stuck in the dilemma if you should get the crazy deal on the Fujifilm X-H1 or not, the good…

The post NOW OR NEVER: Terrific Fujifilm X-H1 Deal is Ending and Rebates on Fujifilm X-T3, X-T2 and GFX50R appeared first on Fuji Rumors.

Full Article on Fuji Rumors

Link to post
Share on other sites

I really don’t know what Fuji is doing, but here in Holland the X-H1 with grip is nog the same price as a body withouten grip. From euro 2200 to euro 1299! I think X-H1 is not the great camera they thougt it to be. In fact it is not, the X-T3 is much better. So they simply dump the X-H1 for a price lower than a new X-T3. 

I feel betrayed by Fuji! And now I even cannot sell that useless X-H1 for a normal price. What a world we live in!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I never consider cameras as an "investment" that should give me back decent money. In fact, as soon as you buy it and leave the store, the camera, still in the box, loses already 20% of the value.

I buy cameras because I want to use them, not because I consider it a good investment project.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree. Buying a digital camera thinking of an investment is the same as buying a computer for the same goal. Totally useless.
However the freefall of the price of the X-H1 is unbelievable. I also think there must be something behind it. In my whole life I've never seen a camera that appeared on the market some months earlier, halve its price so quickly.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Posts

    • Because the sensor assembly is moved electrmagnetically. When there is no power it is essentially free moving.
    • Ahoy ye hearties! Hoist ye yon Jolly Roger and Cascade away. NGC 1502 The Jolly Roger Cluster:

      Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

      Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

      This is the equivalent of 43 minutes, 40 seconds of exposure. NGC 1502 is a neat little cluster located in the Camelopardalis Constellation. This region of space was thought to be fairly empty by early astronomers, but as you can see, there is a lot there. Kemble's Cascade (a.k.a. Kemble 1) is named for Father Lucian Kemble, a Canadian Franciscan friar who wrote about it to Walter Scott Houston, an author for the Sky And Telescope magazine. Houston named the asterism for Fr. Kemble and the name "stuck". NGC 1501 is the Oyster Nebula. A longer focal length telescope is needed to bring this one into good viewing range, but it is well worth the effort. NGC 1502: https://skyandtelescope.org/online-gallery/ngc-1502/ Camelopardalis Constellation: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Camelopardalis Kemble's Cascade (and NGC 1501: The Oyster Nebula): https://www.constellation-guide.com/kembles-cascade/ Arrrrrr Matey.
    • Looking for input; there are some decent deals and might want to take advantage to expand my lenses for my 100s already own: 110/2 32-64 35-70 100-200 + TC   Shooting mostly family shots, bringing my kit to capture family outings indoors and out. Tracking the 63/43 effective FLs on the two, but has anybody used both? Would the 55 (covered by two zooms right now) be redundant? Would the 80 be too similar in character to my 110 for portraiture?
    • See what I mean? Two instantaneous ads. Worthless.   
×
×
  • Create New...