Jump to content

Fujifilm Lenses 2018: Top Picks, Reviews, Fujinon F1.4/1.2 vs F2 and in 2019 Fuji Needs Lower Cost Lenses and Redesigned 35/1.4

Fuji X Rumors

By Fuji X Rumors
in Fuji X Rumors & News

 Share

Recommended Posts

Fuji X Rumors Grand Master

Fuji X Rumors

Posted
Posted

Fujinon Lenses Roundup The Fujifilm year 2018 is over, and BHphoto decided to wrap it up in their 2018 Fujifilm lenses in Review blog post. They go over all the announced lenses (maybe even over some you might have missed,…

The post Fujifilm Lenses 2018: Top Picks, Reviews, Fujinon F1.4/1.2 vs F2 and in 2019 Fuji Needs Lower Cost Lenses and Redesigned 35/1.4 appeared first on Fuji Rumors.

Full Article on Fuji Rumors

Link to post
Share on other sites
citral Community Regular

citral

Posted
Posted

The guy who thinks fuji NEEDS to rehaul the 35 f1.4 ASAP, or else... Doesn't sound like a photographer at all. He wants something that would be good at everything and excels at nothing. The 35 f1.4 excels at fine art and street, there's still very much a market for it, people who are not blaming their lack of skill on gear like 95% of ppl nowadays

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Posts

    • BobJ
      X-T5 Cleaning Mistake

      By BobJ · Posted

      Because the sensor assembly is moved electrmagnetically. When there is no power it is essentially free moving.
    • jerryy
      Astro-photography (open thread)

      By jerryy · Posted

      Ahoy ye hearties! Hoist ye yon Jolly Roger and Cascade away. NGC 1502 The Jolly Roger Cluster:

      Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

      Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

      This is the equivalent of 43 minutes, 40 seconds of exposure. NGC 1502 is a neat little cluster located in the Camelopardalis Constellation. This region of space was thought to be fairly empty by early astronomers, but as you can see, there is a lot there. Kemble's Cascade (a.k.a. Kemble 1) is named for Father Lucian Kemble, a Canadian Franciscan friar who wrote about it to Walter Scott Houston, an author for the Sky And Telescope magazine. Houston named the asterism for Fr. Kemble and the name "stuck". NGC 1501 is the Oyster Nebula. A longer focal length telescope is needed to bring this one into good viewing range, but it is well worth the effort. NGC 1502: https://skyandtelescope.org/online-gallery/ngc-1502/ Camelopardalis Constellation: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Camelopardalis Kemble's Cascade (and NGC 1501: The Oyster Nebula): https://www.constellation-guide.com/kembles-cascade/ Arrrrrr Matey.
    • Greybeard
      Only comments are baited ads

      By Greybeard · Posted

    • BIGOAK
      55 or 80?

      By BIGOAK · Posted

      Looking for input; there are some decent deals and might want to take advantage to expand my lenses for my 100s already own: 110/2 32-64 35-70 100-200 + TC   Shooting mostly family shots, bringing my kit to capture family outings indoors and out. Tracking the 63/43 effective FLs on the two, but has anybody used both? Would the 55 (covered by two zooms right now) be redundant? Would the 80 be too similar in character to my 110 for portraiture?
    • Fotomatt
      Only comments are baited ads

      By Fotomatt · Posted

      See what I mean? Two instantaneous ads. Worthless.   
×
×
  • Create New...