Jump to content

Sony A7000 (+ X-PRO2?) with better dyamic range than the Full Frame A7 series thanks to native “on sensor HDR”! src-SAR


Recommended Posts

This is basically what Magic Lantern does to the 5D Mark III. They call it Dual ISO I believe - they have alternating lines of a higher ISO for proper exposure and a lower ISO for cleaner images. It seems to work well, albeit at a lower resolution than the sensor natively outputs.

 

I think it's a cool idea, but it's not a priority for me. The dynamic range on the newer Fuji sensors is already amazing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also last time I tried out the magic lantern you needed a separate piece of software to actually deal with the images and video. I can imagine for a camera to do this it would need to be quite powerful.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This concept is not possible with X-Trans. You can't just skip 2 lines with X-Trans, you'd have to skip 6 lines. That's a pretty large exposure gap, and it would also need a different sensor design.

I would prefer bayern high HDR sensor instead of X-trans. In your x-m1 vs x-a1 comparison x-trans showed no significant advantage over Bayer. And this new technology seems to show serious DR increase.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Posts

    • X Raw Studio works with image files on your computer - not the image files on the camera card
    • Hello. Thankyou,now Is all more clear: I have take some time in your link. Let tell you. I has totaly forget this machine have "compress picture option" and not Only "compress lossless" anyway not change the experiment. RAW  and this last two format look like same result about Number of recording picture. Can tell all results in this: in raw you can make 17 pictures for second. Is wrong. Is about One single Press and wait buffer. Full 30/20/10/8 not change. After 17 Need Press again. You not can Press before "redgreen light recording Is on".   With preshot you can have 25  are more 7 pictures . The story change Only in jpg shot only. In jpg at 30 you have 30 picture but redgreen light off very Fast so you can shot very quicly. At 20 shot Is about start look like infinite shot. 60. So the best performance are this last One  about Speed and recording picture after camera working witout big limit. I want take a shot about Italy cyclet Just for passion. I think i Will use this last setting.  After Need check when battery not are full change and ambient temp.  Anyway my cam look like exactly specific about you link. Im Happy my cam working perfectly.
    • I do not use Flickr, so I do not know what their BB code is. All I did was copy the second link you provided, (starting at https: and ending at  _k.jpg — leave off the [img] and [/img] tags) and pasted it into the message. After a moment, a message popped up asking if I wanted to paste it as the image or as a plain link. I did this twice, the first time I had it paste in as the image and the second time as a link. Nothing fancy or tricky.
    • So do I just copy the BB code from flickr and paste it anywhere on the page like other forums or is there some other trick I need to perform to get it to post?
×
×
  • Create New...