Jump to content
JpP

Mount adapter : Mamiya RB67 to Fujifilm GFX

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Hi guys

Does any of you GFX users have any experience of mounting a Mamiya RB series lens on the GFX body; found many adapters for mamiya 645 lenses, but only the bulky Fotodiox one for 67 series.  https://fotodioxpro.com/products/rb-rz67-gfx-pro

Any hint ?

Thx

JpP

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you want to use RZ or RB lenses (I have RZ and don't know much about RB lenses) you need to replicate the bellows as the lens doesn't have a focus ring.

I have the RZ adapter from Fotodiox for Canon EOS and it works quite well. You turn the barrel of the adapter to focus (replicate the bellows). 

I have also been looking at RZ/GFX version and it seems quite good. I don't think the kipon unit you have found will work as it is a static adapter and you would not be able to focus to lens. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Thank you very much noodlejam; I didn't take in account that there were no focus ring on that lenses ! Thanks for helping. I have now to wait for finding the right stuff for the purpose.

Regards

JpP

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

  • Posts

    • YES, YES, YES!!  The direction Fuji has taken lately has been all for video and AF at the expense of ISO performance.  Forget about producing good stills, I'm not so sure they care.  The XT-2 was much better than the XT-3 and so far all I see is Fuji stepping back from image quality for the sake of AF and video. The "XH" series was supposed to mean "Hybrid" for both video and stills while the "XT" line was supposed to continue to be a camera, not a camcorder.   Now the XT-4 is simply the XH
    • I'll tell you what.  I DO NOT LIKE THE DIRECTION OF FUJI AT THE MOMENT.  If you want video, buy a camcorder, period!!
    • Hi, I’m passionate about underwater photography and I’ve been wondering for a long time why Fuji doesn’t invest much toward this category ?  Sony, Nikon, Canon, Panasonic and Olympus are excelling underwater with their vast choice of lenses ( especially native fisheye lenses with autofocus, close macro and ultra wide angle ) ans it’s really frustrating not to be able to use any x-mount camera to their full potential.  Any thoughts ? Are there rumors about that ?
    • I was not here when this thread happened and I did not take part in it, but having read through it now I would say that although epscott held his stance in a very military manner, which some others obviously could not tolerate well, he stated his opinions to which he had his full right and he did not deserve the negative reactions that he got. He addressed Fujifilm in his post and his requirements are obviously valid for a big enough group of users and that led to Fuji creating a camera with tho
    • Does anyone know if you can output to a monitor from the xpro3 ?
×
×
  • Create New...