Jump to content

XT2 afc focussing with new firmware


miguel

Recommended Posts

I have been trying to shoot gokarts at our local track with the xt2, battery pack and a 50-140 zoom.

Shutter speeds between 1/1000 and 1/3000 to freeze the karts, apertures f2.8 and f4.

The custom focus was set to 3 which shows a gokart in the setup, should be ideal I thought.

Focussing was done using back button afc focus, held in all the time I was tracking the karts, I also tried assigning afc to the shutter button. Just for consistency I left the focus bracket in the centre of the image and used the two smallest squares to track the karts.

 

The results were a disaster, the focus was never where I wanted it, I shot at 11 fps to try that also, when I pressed the shutter on the lead kart coming towards me, it was not sharp but the 4th or 5th kart behind was reasonably sharp,

 

There is no problem with the outfit as the static shots I took are pin sharp as they should be.

 

Any ideas anyone?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Afraid not, I deleted them in disgust.

 

In its simplest form, where I had 3 or 4 karts coming towards me, having tracked the first kart, it was the third or fourth kart that was the sharpest, sometimes the focus was too close to me and none of the Karts were sharp.

I deliberately used the centre single point for focus and kept the kart in the centre of the viewfinder to the best of my ability.

 

I was so disappointed because I used the centre focus point in afc mode on some static shots and they were pin sharp.

 

I shall have to go out on the street and test this setup with oncoming cars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I may have found the partial answer to my problem,

Apparently if you shoot at greater than 5 fps you will have a lag in the viewfinder,

So with me shooting at 11fps what I see in the evf whilst I am tracking a fast gokart is the lastt frame exposed, not the current view.

Therefore I am tracking the subject based on the last exposed view of the sequence, meanwhile the subject has moved quite some distance suffucient to render it soft or out of focus.

 

The only thing I can not apply this solution to, is why the first frame of each sequence is not sharp?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Because the sensor assembly is moved electrmagnetically. When there is no power it is essentially free moving.
    • Ahoy ye hearties! Hoist ye yon Jolly Roger and Cascade away. NGC 1502 The Jolly Roger Cluster:

      Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

      Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

      This is the equivalent of 43 minutes, 40 seconds of exposure. NGC 1502 is a neat little cluster located in the Camelopardalis Constellation. This region of space was thought to be fairly empty by early astronomers, but as you can see, there is a lot there. Kemble's Cascade (a.k.a. Kemble 1) is named for Father Lucian Kemble, a Canadian Franciscan friar who wrote about it to Walter Scott Houston, an author for the Sky And Telescope magazine. Houston named the asterism for Fr. Kemble and the name "stuck". NGC 1501 is the Oyster Nebula. A longer focal length telescope is needed to bring this one into good viewing range, but it is well worth the effort. NGC 1502: https://skyandtelescope.org/online-gallery/ngc-1502/ Camelopardalis Constellation: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Camelopardalis Kemble's Cascade (and NGC 1501: The Oyster Nebula): https://www.constellation-guide.com/kembles-cascade/ Arrrrrr Matey.
    • Looking for input; there are some decent deals and might want to take advantage to expand my lenses for my 100s already own: 110/2 32-64 35-70 100-200 + TC   Shooting mostly family shots, bringing my kit to capture family outings indoors and out. Tracking the 63/43 effective FLs on the two, but has anybody used both? Would the 55 (covered by two zooms right now) be redundant? Would the 80 be too similar in character to my 110 for portraiture?
    • See what I mean? Two instantaneous ads. Worthless.   
×
×
  • Create New...