Jump to content

X-e1 user looking to buy new lenses.. sample photos i took at the shop. Need help


Recommended Posts

Hello all. So.. I have had my x-e1 with kit lens (18-55) for several years now. Only ever got the kit lens that came with it. I think the camera was too advanced for me at the time when I bought it and never really dove too deep into quality of my pictures. I would just snap away in auto mode and use the photos right out of the camera, not even post processing them.

 

Come a few years later and i've learned more and more about (and have a pretty decent knowledge about all the aspects of a photo) and even started post processing in LR. Still learning but know a heck lot more than i did before. So now before i upgrade my camera, i wanted to upgrade my lens game. Have done a ton of research on what glass i'd like and the first ones out would be a 16mm f1.4, 23mm f2, and the 56mm f1.2. Will be doing mostly: street, landscape, and portrait. I just want these images to be as sharp as possible.

 

Before spending the money on these I wanted to take some sample shots with my camera and those lenses to see if it would be even worth putting on the x-e1. My local shop was kind enough to let me try them in the store and so I did. I took a quick few shots and wanted to see on my computer how sharp these images would be. 

 

This is where i need some help. I have linked the raw files of the images in this post. I don't know if i'm crazy or these are how the images should look with the camera combo I have. I really don't find them as sharp as I thought they would be... Would anyone be able to tell me if that is the quality i will be getting with the x-e1 or if put onto something like the x-h1 (which i am wanting as my next upgrade) they would look even sharper. Or was it that my settings for the photos were just completely off? Found to be a lot of noise in some of them. I know the ISO was high in a few of them but I had kept that at Auto so i don't know. 

 

I know that some of the apertures that i took in the pictures were not ideal as you should "never" shoot at the highest and lowest apertures of the lens, unless ideal situation, but I guess i wasn't paying that much attention while I was snapping the pics as I didn't want to take much of the salesman time. 

 

Any feedback would greatly help in leading me in the right direction of if I should invest in the lenses and see a big improvement once I upgrade my camera, or if this is really how the images will always look. Thanks!

 

https://www.dropbox.com/s/saaino9yd76tanr/lens test.zip?dl=0

Link to post
Share on other sites

no the pictures won’t “ look” any sharper that the monitor that you are visualizing the images with (I doubt that you own a monitor with a resolution so high that you can see the difference ) you will be just able to print bigger.

 

As for “ looks”: uploading raw images is not the best way to judge sharpness because you can’t see a raw image, what you see is the embedded low res jepeg in a raw picture generated by the visualization software or raw converter.

 

THat’s why they are not as sharp as you” thought” they would be, because they aren’t and can’t be.

Edited by milandro
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

      Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

       
    • More testing of lenses today.  Nikon 70-200 f/2.8 IF ED VR (same applies to VR II) - dreadful. Heavy vignette at all focal lengths and apertures. Obvioulsy fine in 35mm mode.  Nikon 70-200 f/4 - some vignetting at full frame (similar to 24mm f/1.8 and Sigma 105 f/2.8 so probably correctable or slight crop to 80-90MP). Perfect in 35mm mode.  If weight is an issue for you the kit 35-70 Fuji GFX lens is lightweight and better than you might expect but isn't a fast lens at f/4.5-5.6 
    • Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

      Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

       
    • I use a TECHART ring to mount Canon EF lenses on the GFX 50S-II and 100S-II, maintaining image stabilization and autofocus. The only limitation are lenses with a small rear element diameter that make it impossible to cover medium format. Fast lenses like the EF 85/1.2L or the 100-400L, however, work great.
    • I also use a Nikon to GFX Fringer and it works very well.  24mm f/1.8 vignettes so best used on 35mm mode.  50mm f/1.8 covers the entire frame very well with no issues and is a superb little lens. 105mm Sigma vignettes slightly but is perfectly usable. 300 f/4 likewise the 105.  I have a 70-200 f/20+.8 incoming to test so will report back but I'm expecting a little vignetting.  Even in 35mm mode the image is still 60MP and if you're prepared to manually crop and correct you can get 80-90 MP images.  I also have a C/Y to GFX adapter.  The 24mm Sigma Superwide vignettes strongly. Ditto 28-80 Zeiss Sonnar. 80-200 f/4 Sonnar is perfectly usable. All work fine as 35mm mode lenses.  I also have an M42 adapter which I tried with the Carl Zeiss Jena 135mm f/3.5 with good results. 
×
×
  • Create New...