Jump to content

B&W negatives «scanning» using a X-Pro2


Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

I think it's worth it to share my experience with the process of digitize black & white negatives using the X-Pro2. If some peoples were thinking about it, it will be faster to make it work! First you need the following :

  • X-Pro2
  • A good Macro lens (I use a Micro-Nikkor 55mm/2.8, exceptionnal lens for reproduction work)
  • An extension tube (if your lens don't go to a 1:1 ratio)
  • A lightbox (I use an old X-Ray lightbox!)
  • A reproduction bench (I made one by myself, cheap but effective)
  • A remote to avoid camera vibrations during exposure
  • A can of compressed air for negatives cleaning
  • A way to keep negatives in place and flat (I use a negative carrier from an old enlarger)
  • An old 50mm. Used as a magnifier for choosing the good negatives from the bad ones.

After testing, it appears that only Macro lenses can do that task with excellent results. I tried RAW as I always shoot RAW but I got artifact pattern. The JPEG processor correct the pattern perfectly.

 

post-22219-0-86477000-1515173894_thumb.jpg

 

post-22219-0-01642100-1515173938_thumb.jpg

 

Here are the settings I use on the X-Pro2:

  • JPEG
  • ISO200
  • Auto speed
  • +1 exposure correction
  • F8
  • Manual focus (after a good adjustment, it stay at the right focusing distance)
  • Drive = single
  • Electronic shutter
  • NR -4
  • Sharpening -4
  • Shadow details -1
  • Highlights details -1
  • Simple B&W custom setting

Few months ago I asked my local lab to scan few negatives for an exhibition. They used a Nikon Coolscan 5000ED. I wasn't sure that the results were as good as the negatives were but at the time I had no way to have comparatives. Now that I have that set-up, I compare the scans from the lab to my «scans» made with the X-Pro2 and mines aren't just better, they are A LOT better! Much more tonalities. During the firsts experimentations, I search the web and found that when well done, this method give amazing results and I can confirm that. The only better way to digitize is using a drum scan, an impossible solution for my thousands of B&W negatives from 20 years of analog photography.

 

When the «scans» are done, I transfer the pictures on computer, Using Photoshop batch process, I invert the negatives. After that I import the positives in Lightroom. The rest is similar processing as with digital pictures.

 

Until now I have 1200 scans completed so I really can confirm that this method work! Hoping that it can simplified the process for others tempted by this solution for «scanning» B&W negatives.

 

As exemple, here is a picture I first shoot 20 years ago using a Leica M4-P with a summilux 35mm on Tri-X film

 

post-22219-0-50852600-1515174109_thumb.jpg

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

I would recommend trying either silverfast or colourfast plugins rather than doing the

inversion in photoshop.

 

With colour negatives these tools are pretty much required for getting good results,

with B&W they just make good results much easier.

 

The problem, simply put, is that the inversion required is 1/x rather than 1-x and if you use 1-x

(like photoshop) the tonality curve will be wrong and fixing will need quite a bit of fiddling

with curves or, less accurately, exposure, shadow, and highlight controls.

 

I have no interest with these firms but have worked in movie restoration for many years.

 

Finally, I really like your image of the child in the graveyard.

 

-Steve

Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting to know. I'm not in the color negatives yet and don't have a lot of good ones. But I'm interested in testing what you propose in B&W as I still have few thousands to «scan»! I'm not sure though to well understand the difference it will make. In my first tests I was using Lightroom curve that I simply invert. It worked but the fine tuning after was a nightmare as all the controls were inverted or their functionality changed. Bad. Using Photoshop inversion in a batch process is fast. After some tests with different exposures, I choose to overexpose for 1 stop and after the inversion I only need minimal adjustments on the Lightroom curve if the negative was of «normal» contrast. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the comment on that pic! That image have a good story...Many years ago, I won a regional photo contest with that one. The theme was «cemeteries» as you can easily guess! The sponsor was a funeral home and the winning picture got a framing and was shown at the funeral home. Around one year after the contest, I get a call from the owner of the home asking for another print of the picture...Someone had stolen the picture! Peoples with great taste but no respect at all ;-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Steve I just read about the inversion process and it's really interesting! In the next days I will give a try to http://www.colorperfect.com/colorperfect.html?lang=en  I didn't found colourfast. Silverfast editing software is a bit expensive at 250U$. As I already get really good tonalities in my files that I'm satisfied with, I can't justify to myself buying such a costly software. But I understand someone working with old color negatives to look for such tools! I will begin with Colorperfect to see if I get better results.

 

One of my worry is that I will be unable to batch process. If so it will be ineffective for my main goal right now that is to digitized thousands of B&W negatives. It's mandatory than I can send hundreds of files at ounce. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Thanks for bring up camera scanning.  I have given it a try thanks to you.  I had originally planned to use contact printing and scanning of the print but now it is much quicker, easier, and better.

 

I am testing Arista Ortho film and learning how to shoot and develop it in 4X5 and 5X7 formats.  I don't need all the scanning equipment since it is not a large batch process.  I just put the negative on my contact printer, light it up and shoot with my X100F.  I just hand hold the camera.  It is not a macro camera of course but gives high quality images that I crop as needed and then get a good quick look at my shooting and wet processing results.

Edited by neal3K
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...