Jump to content

1.4/2 teleconverter since firmware update?


ullmandds

Recommended Posts

I had heard prior to the recent firmware update there were issues with the 2x and the 100-400.

 

Can anyone comment on whether this is no longer the case???

 

I have just tried my 100-400 with 2x teleconverter on my XT2 with the new firmware. It works, though (as you might expect) focus is a bit slow, certainly slower than the 50-140 with 2x converter. I'm afraid I can't comment on whether or not there's a difference in performance after the new XT2 firmware, as I don't normally use the 2x converter on the 100-400 (and after this little experiment I think I'll continue to leave it off, except in exceptional circumstances).

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have just tried my 100-400 with 2x teleconverter on my XT2 with the new firmware. It works, though (as you might expect) focus is a bit slow, certainly slower than the 50-140 with 2x converter. I'm afraid I can't comment on whether or not there's a difference in performance after the new XT2 firmware, as I don't normally use the 2x converter on the 100-400 (and after this little experiment I think I'll continue to leave it off, except in exceptional circumstances).

 

I must agree, any teleconverter is going to affect Focus Speed and Image Quality.  I have the 1.4x converter that I usually keep in my pocket for those shots I just can't reach and then only for a still shot.  I may pick up the 2x someday as there are many shots just out of reach, but it is not a priority.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 6 years later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Because the sensor assembly is moved electrmagnetically. When there is no power it is essentially free moving.
    • Ahoy ye hearties! Hoist ye yon Jolly Roger and Cascade away. NGC 1502 The Jolly Roger Cluster:

      Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

      Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

      This is the equivalent of 43 minutes, 40 seconds of exposure. NGC 1502 is a neat little cluster located in the Camelopardalis Constellation. This region of space was thought to be fairly empty by early astronomers, but as you can see, there is a lot there. Kemble's Cascade (a.k.a. Kemble 1) is named for Father Lucian Kemble, a Canadian Franciscan friar who wrote about it to Walter Scott Houston, an author for the Sky And Telescope magazine. Houston named the asterism for Fr. Kemble and the name "stuck". NGC 1501 is the Oyster Nebula. A longer focal length telescope is needed to bring this one into good viewing range, but it is well worth the effort. NGC 1502: https://skyandtelescope.org/online-gallery/ngc-1502/ Camelopardalis Constellation: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Camelopardalis Kemble's Cascade (and NGC 1501: The Oyster Nebula): https://www.constellation-guide.com/kembles-cascade/ Arrrrrr Matey.
    • Looking for input; there are some decent deals and might want to take advantage to expand my lenses for my 100s already own: 110/2 32-64 35-70 100-200 + TC   Shooting mostly family shots, bringing my kit to capture family outings indoors and out. Tracking the 63/43 effective FLs on the two, but has anybody used both? Would the 55 (covered by two zooms right now) be redundant? Would the 80 be too similar in character to my 110 for portraiture?
    • See what I mean? Two instantaneous ads. Worthless.   
×
×
  • Create New...