Jump to content

XF 2.0/35 R WR Entrance Pupil?


V23

Recommended Posts

Hi, I am seeking information specifying the Entrance Pupil point for FUJINON XF 35mm f/2 R WR lens. It is not given on Fujifilm lens specification website. Fujifilm reply to my enquiries, as “The information you're looking for may not be available”. Obviously information is available but simply not published/given by Fuji. Your advice would be appreciated. Thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would think that with a lens as small as the 35mm f2 it wouldn't much matter for panos, if that is what you have in mind. Take a point about halfway. If you are stitching with lightroom or photoshop it is not likely to be necessary.

 

 

Thank you for your replay BobJ, your suggestion is correct. I guess that it is a technical mine in me that wants everything to be precise in my pursuits. 

Regards, Vlad.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Or you can find the entrance pupil yourself. There are many tutorials online.

 

 

I know of many tutorials on line, but that is not the best way of doing it. I have several Leica M mount lenses and Leica publishes Entrance Pupil for each lens in their technical specification.

I would have thoughts that Fuji would do the same, but it is ok now I have worked that out and there is very little to crop in stitched panoramic shots.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Because the sensor assembly is moved electrmagnetically. When there is no power it is essentially free moving.
    • Ahoy ye hearties! Hoist ye yon Jolly Roger and Cascade away. NGC 1502 The Jolly Roger Cluster:

      Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

      Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

      This is the equivalent of 43 minutes, 40 seconds of exposure. NGC 1502 is a neat little cluster located in the Camelopardalis Constellation. This region of space was thought to be fairly empty by early astronomers, but as you can see, there is a lot there. Kemble's Cascade (a.k.a. Kemble 1) is named for Father Lucian Kemble, a Canadian Franciscan friar who wrote about it to Walter Scott Houston, an author for the Sky And Telescope magazine. Houston named the asterism for Fr. Kemble and the name "stuck". NGC 1501 is the Oyster Nebula. A longer focal length telescope is needed to bring this one into good viewing range, but it is well worth the effort. NGC 1502: https://skyandtelescope.org/online-gallery/ngc-1502/ Camelopardalis Constellation: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Camelopardalis Kemble's Cascade (and NGC 1501: The Oyster Nebula): https://www.constellation-guide.com/kembles-cascade/ Arrrrrr Matey.
    • Looking for input; there are some decent deals and might want to take advantage to expand my lenses for my 100s already own: 110/2 32-64 35-70 100-200 + TC   Shooting mostly family shots, bringing my kit to capture family outings indoors and out. Tracking the 63/43 effective FLs on the two, but has anybody used both? Would the 55 (covered by two zooms right now) be redundant? Would the 80 be too similar in character to my 110 for portraiture?
    • See what I mean? Two instantaneous ads. Worthless.   
×
×
  • Create New...