Jump to content

Hard to sell a Fuji X-T2


woerdhvd

Recommended Posts

I have a XT-2 since december 2016 with 3 lenses: Fujinon XF 23mm F2 R WR, XF 35mm 1.4 R and XF 56mm 1.2 R. Bought it because of the small size and all the good reviews. But i don't use it, don't like it:  i prefer to shoot with Sony mirrorless. So it has only 4.000 clicks. 

Try to sell it for a nice price: € 2.250 for the whole set (new price is € 3.600). The gear is as new and under warranty for the next years. But no one wants to buy the set. There are a lot of used XT-2 for sale. I sold Canon gear before and that was sold for a good price in a couple of days.

So i think the Fuji gear is overpriced and overrated. It isn't much worth when selling it. You should be aware of that when buying it.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

On reflection what rokphish and Warwick say is as it is, I wouldn't buy a complete set camera and lenses. X-T2 with 23mm yes and the other lenses separately might get a better response.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a XT-2 since december 2016 with 3 lenses: Fujinon XF 23mm F2 R WR, XF 35mm 1.4 R and XF 56mm 1.2 R. Bought it because of the small size and all the good reviews. But i don't use it, don't like it:  i prefer to shoot with Sony mirrorless. So it has only 4.000 clicks. 

Try to sell it for a nice price: € 2.250 for the whole set (new price is € 3.600). The gear is as new and under warranty for the next years. But no one wants to buy the set. There are a lot of used XT-2 for sale. I sold Canon gear before and that was sold for a good price in a couple of days.

So i think the Fuji gear is overpriced and overrated. It isn't much worth when selling it. You should be aware of that when buying it.

 

 

 

Shame you don't like them but I think that selling them as a set rather than individually means that unless someone wants exactly what you have to offer, you limit your options.

 

As to overpriced, have you seen how much Sony lenses are being sold at and where exactly are the Sony 35/f2 (23/2) and the 80/f1.2 (56/1.2) to be found? As to over rated, I and many others disagree.

Edited by Woodworth
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • X Raw Studio works with image files on your computer - not the image files on the camera card
    • Hello. Thankyou,now Is all more clear: I have take some time in your link. Let tell you. I has totaly forget this machine have "compress picture option" and not Only "compress lossless" anyway not change the experiment. RAW  and this last two format look like same result about Number of recording picture. Can tell all results in this: in raw you can make 17 pictures for second. Is wrong. Is about One single Press and wait buffer. Full 30/20/10/8 not change. After 17 Need Press again. You not can Press before "redgreen light recording Is on".   With preshot you can have 25  are more 7 pictures . The story change Only in jpg shot only. In jpg at 30 you have 30 picture but redgreen light off very Fast so you can shot very quicly. At 20 shot Is about start look like infinite shot. 60. So the best performance are this last One  about Speed and recording picture after camera working witout big limit. I want take a shot about Italy cyclet Just for passion. I think i Will use this last setting.  After Need check when battery not are full change and ambient temp.  Anyway my cam look like exactly specific about you link. Im Happy my cam working perfectly.
    • I do not use Flickr, so I do not know what their BB code is. All I did was copy the second link you provided, (starting at https: and ending at  _k.jpg — leave off the [img] and [/img] tags) and pasted it into the message. After a moment, a message popped up asking if I wanted to paste it as the image or as a plain link. I did this twice, the first time I had it paste in as the image and the second time as a link. Nothing fancy or tricky.
    • So do I just copy the BB code from flickr and paste it anywhere on the page like other forums or is there some other trick I need to perform to get it to post?
×
×
  • Create New...