Jump to content

Voigtlander 15mm heliar


Recommended Posts

I have tried it on X-Pro1, and it is rather OK, but the XF14 is significantly better. It is a bit soft in the corners, and there is some vignetting, but it is a cute little thing though. I have tried the 12/5.6 too, which is also OK, and the 21/4 which is horribly soft in the corners. Most of these old, symmetrical designs made for film are soft in the corners due to a too steep angle of the light rays hitting the sensor in the corners.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the informative responses folks. Does that mean that apart from the corners it's good? Or do you really feel it's merely ok? I've currently got the xf35, xf27 and xf18-55. I want something wider but can't afford the xf14. Also I'm finding I use the xf27mm more often, even though it's the weaker performer, because of its compact size.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the informative responses folks. Does that mean that apart from the corners it's good? Or do you really feel it's merely ok? I've currently got the xf35, xf27 and xf18-55. I want something wider but can't afford the xf14. Also I'm finding I use the xf27mm more often, even though it's the weaker performer, because of its compact size.

From my observations when I tried this lens about a year ago it is as sharp as the XF14 (or a tad better) in the inner half of the image circle, but then it deteriorates towards the corners which never become 100% sharp dependless of the aperture. As I wrote above, and in several others online-fora, this is a limitation caused by the steep angle of the light rays when they hit the sensor in the corners. Actually not the sensor itself, but the 1mm thick filter stack situated about 2.5 mm in front of the sensor. If you look at a digital Leica you will see that it has a extremely thin filter stack to be able to use these older symmetric lens designs. (The original M8 didn't even have a IR-blocking filter at all which caused a lot of havoc back then.) The new SONYs are even worse off than the Fuji-X due to an even thicker filter stack.

 

Look up: http://www.fujirumors.com/the-performance-of-carl-zeiss-leica-m-lenses-on-the-fujifilm-x-pro-1-by-jan-vogelaar/

 

Newer, retrofocus designs for the M-mount will usually work very well, but then these will be as large as the corresponding XF-lenses.

 

;-D Hans

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

So...I went ahead and bought the Voigtlander 15mm and thought I'd upload some shots taken on my first outing. They are all shot at f8 with focus set at around 1-1.5 metres. Also, the images are jpegs straight out of the camera.

 

My first impressions are very positive (with the quality rather than my photographic ability). I can see that there is some corner fall off but I'm hoping that I can fix this in Capture One. With regards to the corner softness, again I can see that it exists, but I'm not sure I'm worried about it at this stage. Anyway I guess time will tell.

 

1e0a686cf1bcaab92f7cccbb969b8ab0.jpg

 

25d58255389894e1d86d7714d6f23d33.jpg

 

c65d0fc2e881b4dea2dc9c421683fc14.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • X Raw Studio works with image files on your computer - not the image files on the camera card
    • Hello. Thankyou,now Is all more clear: I have take some time in your link. Let tell you. I has totaly forget this machine have "compress picture option" and not Only "compress lossless" anyway not change the experiment. RAW  and this last two format look like same result about Number of recording picture. Can tell all results in this: in raw you can make 17 pictures for second. Is wrong. Is about One single Press and wait buffer. Full 30/20/10/8 not change. After 17 Need Press again. You not can Press before "redgreen light recording Is on".   With preshot you can have 25  are more 7 pictures . The story change Only in jpg shot only. In jpg at 30 you have 30 picture but redgreen light off very Fast so you can shot very quicly. At 20 shot Is about start look like infinite shot. 60. So the best performance are this last One  about Speed and recording picture after camera working witout big limit. I want take a shot about Italy cyclet Just for passion. I think i Will use this last setting.  After Need check when battery not are full change and ambient temp.  Anyway my cam look like exactly specific about you link. Im Happy my cam working perfectly.
    • I do not use Flickr, so I do not know what their BB code is. All I did was copy the second link you provided, (starting at https: and ending at  _k.jpg — leave off the [img] and [/img] tags) and pasted it into the message. After a moment, a message popped up asking if I wanted to paste it as the image or as a plain link. I did this twice, the first time I had it paste in as the image and the second time as a link. Nothing fancy or tricky.
    • So do I just copy the BB code from flickr and paste it anywhere on the page like other forums or is there some other trick I need to perform to get it to post?
×
×
  • Create New...