Jump to content

Preview Exp in M Mode Question


Starkman

Recommended Posts

Hey all,

 

Not sure here, with my X-T10, what exactly the Preview Exposure in Manual Mode setting does. I mean, if I have the camera in full auto and shoot, I see the exposure both in the EVF and the screen whether the Preview Exposure setting is on or off.

 

I do know that it needs to be off when using a flash, but I don't understand its use otherwise.

 

Thanks much,

 

Starkman

Link to post
Share on other sites

I use it when shooting in studio, as it is a lot darker normally (in the studio), as you are using flash and with preview exposure on all you see is a black screen, with preview exposure off it allows you to compose your shot better.

Use a light meter to test settings or just take some test shots :)

 

But in normal use for all none studio work i have it switched on so I can see photos before i press button

 

regards

 

Andrew

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, just to add a couple of comments: Firstly, you will only see the effect of this setting if all your exposure parameters are on manual settings (for example ISO on 200, aperture on f8 and shutter on 125). Then your EVF and LCD will show you exactly what kind of exposure/white balance you will get with your chosen manual settings, and what the effect will be if you change a setting. With any or all of your exposure settings on Auto, the "Preview Exp/WB" setting doesn't operate. Secondly, you don't have to turn the setting off for flash work, but - as Tikcus explains - if you're using flash in dark conditions it helps to turn it off, otherwise you can't see anything much through the EVF/LCD.

 

I too keep it switched on, except for using flash in darker conditions.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think it will make any noticeable difference to battery life whether you keep it turned or off. I'd suggest leaving it turned on so that it's there when you need it (and when you're not in manual mode, the setting isn't in operation anyway).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Because the sensor assembly is moved electrmagnetically. When there is no power it is essentially free moving.
    • Ahoy ye hearties! Hoist ye yon Jolly Roger and Cascade away. NGC 1502 The Jolly Roger Cluster:

      Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

      Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

      This is the equivalent of 43 minutes, 40 seconds of exposure. NGC 1502 is a neat little cluster located in the Camelopardalis Constellation. This region of space was thought to be fairly empty by early astronomers, but as you can see, there is a lot there. Kemble's Cascade (a.k.a. Kemble 1) is named for Father Lucian Kemble, a Canadian Franciscan friar who wrote about it to Walter Scott Houston, an author for the Sky And Telescope magazine. Houston named the asterism for Fr. Kemble and the name "stuck". NGC 1501 is the Oyster Nebula. A longer focal length telescope is needed to bring this one into good viewing range, but it is well worth the effort. NGC 1502: https://skyandtelescope.org/online-gallery/ngc-1502/ Camelopardalis Constellation: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Camelopardalis Kemble's Cascade (and NGC 1501: The Oyster Nebula): https://www.constellation-guide.com/kembles-cascade/ Arrrrrr Matey.
    • Looking for input; there are some decent deals and might want to take advantage to expand my lenses for my 100s already own: 110/2 32-64 35-70 100-200 + TC   Shooting mostly family shots, bringing my kit to capture family outings indoors and out. Tracking the 63/43 effective FLs on the two, but has anybody used both? Would the 55 (covered by two zooms right now) be redundant? Would the 80 be too similar in character to my 110 for portraiture?
    • See what I mean? Two instantaneous ads. Worthless.   
×
×
  • Create New...