Jump to content

X-T2 problem with focus in Auto mode


Recommended Posts

Earlier this year, I started to get fuzzy pictures with my X-T2 (and the 18-135mm lens) so I sent them in to Fujifilm to check.
Back they came with the report that they were "both performing to specification."
But at the foot, under "Remarks", there was this:
"Please be aware that using on fully Auto Mode, shutter speed and ISO, can affect that camera [which] has its issues with focusing."
Not very well expressed (so I added the "which")  -- but most worrying.
That was a month ago. Since then I've been testing it with either the ISO or the shutter speed (or both) on A[uto]:
at relatively close range (3 to 10m): never a problem, sharp as a pin;
10 to 30m or so: OK depending on what I've focused on.
BUT at a greater distance (e.g. landscape, which is what I photograph most), 1 photo out of 3 is unsharp or frankly blurred.
It's not a problem of camera shake. It happens with speeds up to 1/1000, and at ISO 200 to 400.

Has anyone else had this?

Edited by Squiggle
Link to post
Share on other sites

More likely it's an issue with OIS on the lens.

 

I'd suggest trying another lens and see if the problem is the camera (unlikely) or the lens (more likely),as the image sensor simply records the image that is projected by the lens.

 

A sharp image projected from the lens will record sharp on the sensor, but an unsharp image from an unsharp lens will always record unsharp.

 

Sensors are static objects, and don't change or move at all from shot to shot, whereas lenses have lots and lots of moving parts.

 

A wonky OIS will give you unsharp images.

 

OIS does need a second to kick in....which might explain why some are sharp and some not.....

 

Proper shutter technique, regardless of shutter speed, is always critical especially with long lenses. Even 1/1000 won't be sharp without proper technique.

 

Anyhow I'd borrow another lens and see where the problem lies, camera or lens.

 

Please keep us forum users appraised as to how you resolve this...

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had the same thoughts as you, pete1959, so I checked carefully to see if I could correlate the blurred images with insufficient shutter speed.

In particular I took a series of single shots (not in continuous mode) using various speed/aperture/ISO combinations. I was standing firmly on the floor, shooting out of my study window, at a focal length of around 35mm. ISO was low, in the 200-400 range. The most blurred photo was shot at 1/1000th.

 

That was when I sent both the camera and the lens to Fuji at the same time.

They reported that "both [camera and lens] are performing to specification."

 

Since then I have had similar results, with both the 18-135 and the 10-24mm lens, and I have sent some of photos (with full speed/aperture/ISO information) to Fuji. No further comment from them.

 

If no one else has had this problem, I'll return the camera to Fuji and insist that they remedy the fault.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

I am pleased to report that, having sent sample images to both Fujifilm and the camera vendor and then returned the camera to the vendor, I have been supplied with a new X-T2 that takes tack-sharp pictures.

It's taken all that time because no one would believe that this camera could produce blurred images!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Because the sensor assembly is moved electrmagnetically. When there is no power it is essentially free moving.
    • Ahoy ye hearties! Hoist ye yon Jolly Roger and Cascade away. NGC 1502 The Jolly Roger Cluster:

      Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

      Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

      This is the equivalent of 43 minutes, 40 seconds of exposure. NGC 1502 is a neat little cluster located in the Camelopardalis Constellation. This region of space was thought to be fairly empty by early astronomers, but as you can see, there is a lot there. Kemble's Cascade (a.k.a. Kemble 1) is named for Father Lucian Kemble, a Canadian Franciscan friar who wrote about it to Walter Scott Houston, an author for the Sky And Telescope magazine. Houston named the asterism for Fr. Kemble and the name "stuck". NGC 1501 is the Oyster Nebula. A longer focal length telescope is needed to bring this one into good viewing range, but it is well worth the effort. NGC 1502: https://skyandtelescope.org/online-gallery/ngc-1502/ Camelopardalis Constellation: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Camelopardalis Kemble's Cascade (and NGC 1501: The Oyster Nebula): https://www.constellation-guide.com/kembles-cascade/ Arrrrrr Matey.
    • Looking for input; there are some decent deals and might want to take advantage to expand my lenses for my 100s already own: 110/2 32-64 35-70 100-200 + TC   Shooting mostly family shots, bringing my kit to capture family outings indoors and out. Tracking the 63/43 effective FLs on the two, but has anybody used both? Would the 55 (covered by two zooms right now) be redundant? Would the 80 be too similar in character to my 110 for portraiture?
    • See what I mean? Two instantaneous ads. Worthless.   
×
×
  • Create New...