Jump to content

Film, Fuji X, and why I don't care.


abjurina

Recommended Posts

It will be incredible to see one of those server farms in person, you lucky guy

 

But as I said, 4.5 TB of data are nothing, internet is huge, very huge

 

It sounded strange to me too, but megnetic tapes are a really good metod to store "cold data", data that are accessed only once in a time and

don't need high access speeds. And however nowadays a magnetic tape as big as a briefcase can hold more than 150 TB of data, and as CDs they are cheap,

really cheap compared to an hard disk.

Link to post
Share on other sites

to answer the OP's question, I have very little experience with film. I bought a Pentax 35mm point and shoot at 8 years old and used that until I bought my first digital camera in my teens. My uncle gave me an old Pentax SLR that I played with for a while, maybe 12 rolls of film or so. Everything else has been digital. I really liked the 5D Classic.

 

As far as fujifilm cameras, it's really about the camera. I've always loved the look and feel of the old Pentax SLR I was given as well as classic rangefinders I've seen. I really liked the looks of the X100 and the X-Pro1, but didn't buy one. After the X-E1 came out and the price dropped, I ordered it. Partially because it reminded me of a Leica and partially because of the X-Tran sensor. It was somewhat of a love and hate relationship. The EVF lag and sluggish AF annoyed me. I loved everything else about it. I ordered the X-T1 and fell completely in love with it. I've since traded the X-E1 for the X-E2 and bought the X100T and both are excellent. I will probably sell the X-E2 and buy the X-Pro2 when it comes out. I think that will be the perfect combination of features. I love having the OVF and EVF in the X100T. Of course image quality matters too and the fujifilm cameras deliver there as good or better than anyone else.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It will be incredible to see one of those server farms in person, you lucky guy

 

[...]

 

Actually, once the hype wears off, it's just a large open space with tons of PC that's being kept cold that generate a rather loud buzzing sound.

It's not really the physical aspect of it, but really the idea that truck load of data are transiting every single second into that place, most likely more information for any human to be able to learn in a life time.

 

But back on the subject. I got a Fuji mostly because it's small, the IQ is great even on a 3 years old sensor, kinda make me wish my old and aging D5000 could produce anything remotely half good as this, plus I could have full physical controls that I wanted.

Some limitations that I wasn't aware did threw me off, mostly the native ISO being capped at 6400 and same goes for the RAF files not going any higher than that.

 

I was considering the X-T1 against the OM-D EM-5 with the 5 stops in body stabilization and super small lenses but the sensor size was not really much of an improvement with my Nikon 1 being my regular get go camera.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Because the sensor assembly is moved electrmagnetically. When there is no power it is essentially free moving.
    • Ahoy ye hearties! Hoist ye yon Jolly Roger and Cascade away. NGC 1502 The Jolly Roger Cluster:

      Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

      Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

      This is the equivalent of 43 minutes, 40 seconds of exposure. NGC 1502 is a neat little cluster located in the Camelopardalis Constellation. This region of space was thought to be fairly empty by early astronomers, but as you can see, there is a lot there. Kemble's Cascade (a.k.a. Kemble 1) is named for Father Lucian Kemble, a Canadian Franciscan friar who wrote about it to Walter Scott Houston, an author for the Sky And Telescope magazine. Houston named the asterism for Fr. Kemble and the name "stuck". NGC 1501 is the Oyster Nebula. A longer focal length telescope is needed to bring this one into good viewing range, but it is well worth the effort. NGC 1502: https://skyandtelescope.org/online-gallery/ngc-1502/ Camelopardalis Constellation: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Camelopardalis Kemble's Cascade (and NGC 1501: The Oyster Nebula): https://www.constellation-guide.com/kembles-cascade/ Arrrrrr Matey.
    • Looking for input; there are some decent deals and might want to take advantage to expand my lenses for my 100s already own: 110/2 32-64 35-70 100-200 + TC   Shooting mostly family shots, bringing my kit to capture family outings indoors and out. Tracking the 63/43 effective FLs on the two, but has anybody used both? Would the 55 (covered by two zooms right now) be redundant? Would the 80 be too similar in character to my 110 for portraiture?
    • See what I mean? Two instantaneous ads. Worthless.   
×
×
  • Create New...