Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hello,

Delighted that you posted this as I too am having issues.  I own an X-H2S shooting in FLog2C.  I have tried a myriad of combinations of CSTs (with and without using CineonLog) and color management settings to get these FujiFilm LUTS to work.   As yet, I am yet to be successful. There must be a gap somewhere in my understanding.  Hopefully someone can help us out.

Don

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Don Barar said:

Hello,

Delighted that you posted this as I too am having issues.  I own an X-H2S shooting in FLog2C.  I have tried a myriad of combinations of CSTs (with and without using CineonLog) and color management settings to get these FujiFilm LUTS to work.   As yet, I am yet to be successful. There must be a gap somewhere in my understanding.  Hopefully someone can help us out.

Don

I found the solution on an other forum. You have to change the name of the LUT. The problem come from "—" caracter or I don’t remember wich on 

Link to post
Share on other sites

There are no special characters in these new LUTS.  For example, the LUT to convert FLog2C to Provia has a file name of: FLog2C_to_Provia_65grid_V100.cube

Which special character are you referring to?

I even removed the underscores.  That changes nothing.  I also placed a CST node in front of the LUT where I changed the output gamma to CineonLog. Again, no change.

Don

Edited by Don Barar
Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is the solution to using the Eterna 55 file simulation LUTs in Davinci Resolve.   In general, do not use the FLog2C to film simulation LUTs as they are not supported by Davinci Resolve for two reasons: 1) Davinci Resolve does not support Fuji Gamut Color Space and 2) Davinci Resolve does not support FLog2C gamma.  Instead, use Flog2 which is supported by Davinci Resolve.  Here is an example.  Let's say that you want to use Classic Chrome simulation.  Do the following:

  1. Complete your color grade and use a CST to get to Rec 709.
  2. Add a node.  Use a CST to convert from Rec 709 to FLog2.  Output Color space is Rec 2020 and Outout Gamut is FLog2.
  3. Add a node.  Apply the FLog2 to Classic Chrome LUT
  4. Create a combination node from node in steps 2 and 3.
  5. Apply a Key to the combination node and adjust the Key Output Gain to get the amount of the combination node that you want applied.
  6. So that you do not have to do this over and over again, generate a LUT for the combination node.  Remember to turn off all other nodes before generating the LUT.

Hope this helps others.

Don

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 12/10/2025 at 5:13 PM, Don Barar said:

 

Which special character are you referring to?

I found the reddit topic i refere to

https://www.reddit.com/r/davinciresolve/comments/1pc3f1e/cant_apply_new_fujifilm_gfx_55_lut/

"Update for y'all, It's just like what @ExpBalSat said, it's because of the backslashes in the names break them.

I changed the file name and it works now. "
 

For me it was the solution. Realy annoying if it doesn’t work for you 😕

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The backslashes you are referring are just symbols denoting path.  Once you import into these LUTS into Davinci Resolve those backslashes are removed by default and you only see is the true file name which has no backslashes.  Convince yourself of this by opening the LUT folder from the Davinci Resolve Project Settings.  Do you see any backslashes in those LUT names? Of course not.  The only name you see is the one that has the underscores and the periods.

These LUTS work as designed without having to change any path names.  However, they need to be set up properly through CSTs and by what is supported in Davinci Resolve.  Hence, the FLog2C film simulation LUTS cannot be used because Davinci Resolve does not support Fuji Gamut color space and the FLog2C gamut.

Alternatively, Davinci Resolve does support Flog2 film simulation LUTS because the color space for FLog2 is Rec 2020 and there is an FLog2 gamut.

If all you are doing is changing the path names then you are not getting the correct results.

Edited by Don Barar
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • (Open Thread) Not a winter landscape, but still cold.

      Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

      Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

       
    • agreed on the upload but based on the location and number it sounds exactly like the storage slot 1 status icon
    • All three of my bodies (X-E2, X-T4, GFX100S II) have shoot without lenses enabled and they have all had it set since I bought them.  No harm in it at all. Just remember to set the focal length when you fit a manual lens with no electronics otherwise the IBIS (if you have it) goes nuts. I regularly use vintage film lenses from Minolta, Zeiss, Mamiya, Rollei and others on my X mounts along with more modern manual focus stuff from TTArtisans. I also use Nikon AF-S lenses with a Fringer so the world is your oyster! Vintage lenses can be an absolute bargain too - For example the Zeiss 135 f/35 in M42 is as cheap as chips and very sharp as is the excellent Minolta 35-70 Macro (which is also rebadged Leica). 
    • I'm not exaggerating when I say that I have searched with great vigor (and at great expense) for a way to capture IR images with a Fujifilm camera for which I didn't have to use major amounts of sharpening to bring out the best. Zooms, primes, Fuji, Tamron, Viltrox, Sigma, Zeiss ... probably 20 lenses all told. Plus multiple IR converted Fuji cameras, X-T1, X-T3, X-T5. I even tried different ways of filtering IR, such as using the Kolari clip-ins and lens-mounted front filters. I was ready to give up until I almost accidentally tried one of the cheapest lenses out there -- the little TTArtisan 27mm F2.8. No hotspots that I could see, and best of all ABSOLUTELY SUPERB SHARPNESS across the entire frame. It's this attribute that I search for, and until now, never achieved. In my prior attempts, I listened to the advice from the "pundits", picking up a copy of the venerable Fuji 14mm F2.8, the Zeiss Touitt 12mm F2.8, Fuji 23 and 35mm F2.0, even the very similar 7Artisans 27mm F2.8, and none of them come even close to the TTArtisan for edge sharpness in infrared. Incidentally, I'm using a Kolari 720nm clip-in filter. Sure the TT has its issues -- vignetting at 2.8, tendency to flare with sunlight nearby, but all in all, this lens is glued to my X-T5 for now. This image was taken hand-held with this lens -- completely unedited!
    • Hy there When Im using the fan001 on the XH2s and I flip the LCD Screen vertically by 180 degrees then the image flips vertically, what is good but it also flips horizontally. The clean feed on HDMI is not flipping horizontally but its also flipping if the HDMI output info display is on. When I unmount the fan then the image flips only vertically. My firmware is updated to the latest version. Any ideas if there is a fix for that?
×
×
  • Create New...