Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I know, I know it's a medium format camera, but I love the Helios m42 lenses on the GFX 50s ii and they aren't medium format lenses.

I have a Fuji GFX 50s ii that I just bought and recently bought a Mitakon 65mm lens which is built like a tank.I love the lens but it's extremely heavy for me.

Big side note is that I have nerve damage on my left arm & I've been out of photography a bit before I ended up with it. I bought the gfx50s ii with lenses without realizing just how bad the pain was going to be with the heavier lenses. The other option is that I may have to sell my 50sii which I really don't want to do. 

I'm trying to figure out what brands may have the best autofocus/lightweight glass out there to adapt to my 50s ii. I'm also trying to keep in mind with those lenses if I do have to sell the 50s ii I will have to decide wether to stay with Fuji or with another brand. I just don't know if theres a huge difference between all the lenses. Like how much autofocus matters between the lens you use, adapter and then the camera itself. Or if all it mostly relies on the adapter and camera,etc.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I have the Fringer auto lens converter for Nikon F to GFX, and it works quite well. You can only use the Nikon AF-S and AF-P lenses for autofocus; the older AF-D lenses do not have built-in motors and rely on the motor in the Nikon AF cameras, which the Fringer does not have.

I have not used it myself, but I have read that the Fringer adapter for Canon EF works well too.

I use lots of FF lenses on my GFX50R, but they only cover 1:1 format, 33x33mm instead of the full 33x44mm sensor. Also, most of the lenses I use are manual focus M-mount, which are tiny and super-light compared to any of the GFX lenses. I also use Nikon PC lenses, which have a larger image circle, and easily cover the GFX frame, just not with full shift in the horizontal direction. Both the M and PC lenses are manual focus though, so if AF is important, you are more limited.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 7 months later...

I also use a Nikon to GFX Fringer and it works very well. 

24mm f/1.8 vignettes so best used on 35mm mode. 
50mm f/1.8 covers the entire frame very well with no issues and is a superb little lens.
105mm Sigma vignettes slightly but is perfectly usable.
300 f/4 likewise the 105. 

I have a 70-200 f/20+.8 incoming to test so will report back but I'm expecting a little vignetting. 

Even in 35mm mode the image is still 60MP and if you're prepared to manually crop and correct you can get 80-90 MP images. 

I also have a C/Y to GFX adapter. 
The 24mm Sigma Superwide vignettes strongly.
Ditto 28-80 Zeiss Sonnar.
80-200 f/4 Sonnar is perfectly usable.
All work fine as 35mm mode lenses. 

I also have an M42 adapter which I tried with the Carl Zeiss Jena 135mm f/3.5 with good results. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I use a TECHART ring to mount Canon EF lenses on the GFX 50S-II and 100S-II, maintaining image stabilization and autofocus.

The only limitation are lenses with a small rear element diameter that make it impossible to cover medium format.

Fast lenses like the EF 85/1.2L or the 100-400L, however, work great.

Edited by Giampaolo Masserano
Link to post
Share on other sites

More testing of lenses today. 

Nikon 70-200 f/2.8 IF ED VR (same applies to VR II) - dreadful. Heavy vignette at all focal lengths and apertures. Obvioulsy fine in 35mm mode. 

Nikon 70-200 f/4 - some vignetting at full frame (similar to 24mm f/1.8 and Sigma 105 f/2.8 so probably correctable or slight crop to 80-90MP). Perfect in 35mm mode. 

If weight is an issue for you the kit 35-70 Fuji GFX lens is lightweight and better than you might expect but isn't a fast lens at f/4.5-5.6 

Edited by thelostkiwi
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • (Open Thread) Not a winter landscape, but still cold.

      Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

      Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

       
    • agreed on the upload but based on the location and number it sounds exactly like the storage slot 1 status icon
    • All three of my bodies (X-E2, X-T4, GFX100S II) have shoot without lenses enabled and they have all had it set since I bought them.  No harm in it at all. Just remember to set the focal length when you fit a manual lens with no electronics otherwise the IBIS (if you have it) goes nuts. I regularly use vintage film lenses from Minolta, Zeiss, Mamiya, Rollei and others on my X mounts along with more modern manual focus stuff from TTArtisans. I also use Nikon AF-S lenses with a Fringer so the world is your oyster! Vintage lenses can be an absolute bargain too - For example the Zeiss 135 f/35 in M42 is as cheap as chips and very sharp as is the excellent Minolta 35-70 Macro (which is also rebadged Leica). 
    • I'm not exaggerating when I say that I have searched with great vigor (and at great expense) for a way to capture IR images with a Fujifilm camera for which I didn't have to use major amounts of sharpening to bring out the best. Zooms, primes, Fuji, Tamron, Viltrox, Sigma, Zeiss ... probably 20 lenses all told. Plus multiple IR converted Fuji cameras, X-T1, X-T3, X-T5. I even tried different ways of filtering IR, such as using the Kolari clip-ins and lens-mounted front filters. I was ready to give up until I almost accidentally tried one of the cheapest lenses out there -- the little TTArtisan 27mm F2.8. No hotspots that I could see, and best of all ABSOLUTELY SUPERB SHARPNESS across the entire frame. It's this attribute that I search for, and until now, never achieved. In my prior attempts, I listened to the advice from the "pundits", picking up a copy of the venerable Fuji 14mm F2.8, the Zeiss Touitt 12mm F2.8, Fuji 23 and 35mm F2.0, even the very similar 7Artisans 27mm F2.8, and none of them come even close to the TTArtisan for edge sharpness in infrared. Incidentally, I'm using a Kolari 720nm clip-in filter. Sure the TT has its issues -- vignetting at 2.8, tendency to flare with sunlight nearby, but all in all, this lens is glued to my X-T5 for now. This image was taken hand-held with this lens -- completely unedited!
    • Hy there When Im using the fan001 on the XH2s and I flip the LCD Screen vertically by 180 degrees then the image flips vertically, what is good but it also flips horizontally. The clean feed on HDMI is not flipping horizontally but its also flipping if the HDMI output info display is on. When I unmount the fan then the image flips only vertically. My firmware is updated to the latest version. Any ideas if there is a fix for that?
×
×
  • Create New...