Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Does anyone know why this is happening and how to fix it?

 

For some reason, some of my images are turning purple and it's not fixable just by clicking on reset in lightroom develop or in camera raw photoshop. The preview of the images on my camera are normal but when I import them to lightroom or camera raw they do this. 

 

I tried resetting the images, applying all the setting to 0 or balanced, copy and pasting presets applied to other images that were not purple and all that did was apply the presets over the purple tinted image. I also sent the raw file to a friend thinking that maybe it was my adobe but he got the same problem.

 

I'm using lightroom cc 2015.9 and camera raw 9.9

 

I've posted a link to a raw file if you guys would like to open the image and give it a try

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B-M3KcTQibo7Zjc2MllxMWJPTFU/view?usp=sharing

 

Thanks

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Edited by julianlimh
Link to post
Share on other sites

I've never seen the purple thing happen to my X-T2 files, but I do sometimes get dramatic under-exposure randomly out of nowhere. I played with your sample file a bit and it seems like it's pretty easy to correct for the purple tint, but that doesn't change the fact that it shouldn't be there in the first place. Sorry I can't help you!

Link to post
Share on other sites

The underexposure is not random! It's because LR does not apply auto DR settings correctly. Don't use auto DR, and you're fine.

 

As for the purple color, can can you fix it with white balance adjustments?

Edited by voodooless
Link to post
Share on other sites

The underexposure is not random! It's because LR does not apply auto DR settings correctly. Don't use auto DR, and you're fine.

 

As for the purple color, can can you fix it with white balance adjustments?

"The underexposure is not random!" 

Fair enough, but I have taken 10 photos in a row in about four seconds in lighting that doesn't change even a little bit and only one or two photos in the middle of the burst will come out about two stops under-exposed. It very well may be the auto-DR feature, but it still seems pretty random to me. 

 

I managed to fix most of the issue with the purple with the white balance eye-dropper. The file is a little weird and I'm not sure what was truly white on the scene, but I got a pretty natural looking approximation by clicking around for a white surface. Going to "daylight balance" in the white balance definitely gives a purple cast though. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

That is NOT normal to the extreme!

 

There is no reason you should have to jump through hoops color balancing etc.

 

This should be a WYSIWYG camera (What you see is what you get)

 

You have a defective camera.

 

Period.

 

My 2 cents is stop aggravating yourself and send the camera in for repair.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I know little about this, but wonder if it's possible, instead, that he has a defective Lightroom? Just speculating.

 

Meanwhile, and separately, I note that various 'issues' various participants report here seem to be associated with using their cameras in multi-speed applications; not sure if I framed that right, but capturing a large number of images in a short space of time is what I'm getting at.

 

If indeed this is the essential issue, then would it be associated with the CPU (or whatever it's called these days), the ability of the camera to multitudinously (new word, OK?) process everything pretty much simultaneously?

 

-------------------------------------------------------------

 

I'm also interested in this from a personal viewpoint, as I'm seriously contemplating purchasing Lightroom in order to best process my X-T2 raw images. Not to send this off topic, but what (if any) are the alternatives? Do they make pictures purple? And like that ...

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think it is something with the white balance.  When I set the WB to "Auto" in LR as opposed to "As Shot", it is better (not perfect).  The main change when setting WB to Auto in LR is a change in the Tint number.  Is it possible you have some sort of WB fine tuning set up wrong in camera (this wouldn't explain why it looks good on the camera LCD)?

Edited by rh22
Link to post
Share on other sites

I know little about this, but wonder if it's possible, instead, that he has a defective Lightroom? Just speculating.

 

Meanwhile, and separately, I note that various 'issues' various participants report here seem to be associated with using their cameras in multi-speed applications; not sure if I framed that right, but capturing a large number of images in a short space of time is what I'm getting at.

 

If indeed this is the essential issue, then would it be associated with the CPU (or whatever it's called these days), the ability of the camera to multitudinously (new word, OK?) process everything pretty much simultaneously?

 

-------------------------------------------------------------

 

I'm also interested in this from a personal viewpoint, as I'm seriously contemplating purchasing Lightroom in order to best process my X-T2 raw images. Not to send this off topic, but what (if any) are the alternatives? Do they make pictures purple? And like that ...

I loaded his file to my lightroom as well, and it turned purple. 

 

I also opened the file in Photo Ninja and its purple there as well.

 

>"I'm seriously contemplating purchasing Lightroom in order to best process my X-T2 raw images."

 

Lightroom is really only the best at organization. When it comes to image quality, it's one of the worst (though you can really only tell with large prints and at 100% viewing) If you want "the best" out of your files, you need to be looking elsewhere. Capture One gets good colors, Iridient and Photo Ninja get great fine detail. Many people who are squeezing the very best out of their Fuji files have kludged together a multi-program workflow. For my high-detail black and white work, I start in Photo Ninja and get all the detail and dynamic range out of the file, then export to a TIFF and import into Lightroom for toning and contrast work, and then into Photoshop for really fine correction/dodge and burn. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to clarify, It's not lightroom not sure about the camera though. As you see the file i sent is doing the same thing on everyone's computer. If i preview the file on the camera, it appears normal. 

 

Someone mentioned the burst setting on the camera, that's a very good observation because i did have it on burst but not all the images from that same burst are turning purple. just some of them. 

 

The camera i used on that shoot was rented so if it is the camera im not worried it will happen again as i shot with my own camera the week after and the images seemed fine. I'm hoping it is the camera so it doesn't ever happen again. could it be the sd card. i have two and its seem's to the every second batch of pictures that have this problem. both the sd cards are brand new and were first used on this shoot with this camera. they are the lexar professional sd HC II class 10  1000x 150mb/s

 

My main concern is how to fix the images. they are raw so i have some relief there but still a pain and hoping they are not lost.

 

 

can someone open the file in capture one so we can rule out the idea of it being an adobe problem?

Edited by julianlimh
Link to post
Share on other sites

Just loaded the file in Iridient.. Seems fine to me.. I don't see any purple cast.. Adobe RAW does show it however. Seems to me as though there is nothing wrong with the camera, it's a bug in the converters..

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Iridient on the left, Adobe on the right, both default settings

Edited by voodooless
Link to post
Share on other sites

Just loaded the file in Iridient.. Seems fine to me.. I don't see any purple cast.. Adobe RAW does show it however. Seems to me as though there is nothing wrong with the camera, it's a bug in the converters..

 

attachicon.gifScreen-Shot-2017-04-05-at-20.22.25.jpg

Iridient on the left, Adobe on the right, both default settings

That's pretty strange, but good news for the OP. 

 

The fact that it's only some of the photos and not all makes it strange. There must be some unique setting happening in-camera causing the confusion, similar to how Auto-ISO isn't handled well by editing software. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've opened it in both Photo Ninja and Iridient X-Transformer just fine. I then opened it in Adobe DNG converter and it's crap. The problem lies with something Adobe is misinterpreting something, not with the camera or the file.

 

At some stage there finally will be a general realisation that Adobe is hopeless at handling X-Trans; it hasn't "improved", it isn't "good enough", and it is, in fact, just plain hopeless, full stop.

 

Adobe never has cared about X-Trans, nor will they ever. Just use any of the other processors available that have had more than enough endorsements here and in many other forums, and don't lose sleep over using something other than ACR/LR to process your RAFs.

 

If you are tied to LR by an unbreakable umbilical cord, by all means just use X-Transformer to demosaic, save as DNG and use LR/ACR for edit adjustments and cataloguing. That workflow works just fine.

Link to post
Share on other sites

LR handles my X trans files just fine.

 

All my friends have no issues with Adobe and X trans, nor is there any indication that the OP's issues are reappearing anywhere else.  

 

I have never seen anything like the OP has experienced....and it's more than just a purple tinge....those images have serious issues...they look very odd in all regards.

 

Even my "flattest" images don't look like that.

 

I couldn't disagree more that it's a bug in the conversion of X Trans files.

 

That's simply absurd.

 

One guys camera is suffering the problem.

 

One camera, which is faulty.

 

How that single example of one user serious problem  becomes an  Adobe issue is beyond me.

 

I don't know why the OP doesn't return it for repair.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is NOT a camera problem. Several other converters work just fine, proving that the camera was working as it is supposed to. It would not be the first Adobe x-trans bug anyway (auto-DR anyone?).

 

And I don't know why you don't actually read the topic... the camera: it was a rental, so even if there would be a problem with the camera the OP would probably never know.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Period

 

Really, is that the way to end discussions nowadays?

 

Adobe: bad

Pictorial: good

Iridient: good

Apple preview (Apple RAW): good

FastRawViewer (Libraw): good

Photo Ninja: good

Silkypix: good

In camera: good

 

See the pattern? I'd really still like a good argument why this would be a camera problem?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

I have the same problem when moving images from Fuji X-E3 (firmware 1.20) in compressed RAW/RAF to Adobe DNG Converter and then opening them in Photos.app on OSX 10.13.6. The preview image in Finder looks correct but hitting spacebar for full preview or opening in Photos.app shows it with a heavy purple tint. 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

I am new to this forum. I have an X100s (as well as a Nikon D750). I have just switched from LR6 to Capture One Pro 20. In LR, my workflow was to import the RAF files and then convert them via Library / Convert Photo to DNG. The original RAFs were then deleted automatically. This has saved me quite a bit of space, since the original RAFs are around 32 Mb, while DNGs are generally around 20 Mb. No problems, always worked fine.

Now, in C1, I import my DNG files and suddenly they turn a horrible purplish hue. Even the older ones from the imported LR catalog.

Funny thing is, I also have a number of RAFs which I forgot to convert to DNG. These look fine, as they did from camera.

I have read the above posts and LR gets a lot of flack for handling X-Trans files the wrong way. But both RAF and DNG look fine in LR, and the (same) DNGs look crap in C1. While I am very pleased with C1, I hate this sudden discoloration and I don't know what caused it. In the Base Characteristics I found the ICC profile which was set to Fujifilm X100S Generic V2. I tried switching to a different ICC profile, i.e. Adobe / DNG file / DNG workspace, and Neutral as well. This made a difference, it's not as purple as the original ICC profile, but the purplish hue is still there. It shows up most on the sides of the photos.

Anyone have an explanation for this phenomenon? And/or a way to fix this?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • I'm not exaggerating when I say that I have searched with great vigor (and at great expense) for a way to capture IR images with a Fujifilm camera for which I didn't have to use major amounts of sharpening to bring out the best. Zooms, primes, Fuji, Tamron, Viltrox, Sigma, Zeiss ... probably 20 lenses all told. Plus multiple IR converted Fuji cameras, X-T1, X-T3, X-T5. I even tried different ways of filtering IR, such as using the Kolari clip-ins and lens-mounted front filters. I was ready to give up until I almost accidentally tried one of the cheapest lenses out there -- the little TTArtisan 27mm F2.8. No hotspots that I could see, and best of all ABSOLUTELY SUPERB SHARPNESS across the entire frame. It's this attribute that I search for, and until now, never achieved. In my prior attempts, I listened to the advice from the "pundits", picking up a copy of the venerable Fuji 14mm F2.8, the Zeiss Touitt 12mm F2.8, Fuji 23 and 35mm F2.0, even the very similar 7Artisans 27mm F2.8, and none of them come even close to the TTArtisan for edge sharpness in infrared. Incidentally, I'm using a Kolari 720nm clip-in filter. Sure the TT has its issues -- vignetting at 2.8, tendency to flare with sunlight nearby, but all in all, this lens is glued to my X-T5 for now. This image was taken hand-held with this lens -- completely unedited!
    • Hy there When Im using the fan001 on the XH2s and I flip the LCD Screen vertically by 180 degrees then the image flips vertically, what is good but it also flips horizontally. The clean feed on HDMI is not flipping horizontally but its also flipping if the HDMI output info display is on. When I unmount the fan then the image flips only vertically. My firmware is updated to the latest version. Any ideas if there is a fix for that?
    • In reply to the original question, it all depends on what you mean by infrared.  If you mean "see thermal information", then I agree with the comments here.  However, if you mean near-infrared, the X-T4, or basically any digital camera can be modified to "see" it.  Check out Lifepixel.com and Kolarivision.com for more info. As regards lenses, I'm not exaggerating when I say that I have searched with great vigor (and at great expense) for a way to capture IR images with a Fujifilm camera for which I didn't have to use major amounts of sharpening to bring out the best. Zooms, primes, Fuji, Tamron, Viltrox, Sigma, Zeiss ... probably 20 lenses all told. Plus multiple IR converted Fuji cameras, X-T1, X-T3, X-T5. I even tried different ways of filtering IR, such as using the Kolari clip-ins and lens-mounted front filters. I was ready to give up until I almost accidentally tried one of the cheapest lenses out there -- the little TTArtisan 27mm F2.8. No hotspots that I could see, and best of all ABSOLUTELY SUPERB SHARPNESS across the entire frame. It's this attribute that I search for, and until now, never achieved. In my prior attempts, I listened to the advice from the "pundits", picking up a copy of the venerable Fuji 14mm F2.8, the Zeiss Touitt 12mm F2.8, Fuji 23 and 35mm F2.0, even the very similar 7Artisans 27mm F2.8, and none of them come even close to the TTArtisan for edge sharpness in infrared. Incidentally, I'm using a Kolari 720nm clip-in filter. Sure the TT has its issues -- vignetting at 2.8, tendency to flare with sunlight nearby, but all in all, this lens is glued to my X-T5 for now. This image was taken hand-held with this lens -- completely unedited!
    • No - I don’t think so - it means you can take pictures if you remove the lens completely - but I’m not sure that is a problem
    • I bought a manual lens over xmas and it took me a while to find the "shutter w/o lens" function in the menu settings.  So far I haven't found a way to either put that on the Q menu or marry that setting to one of the 4 custom modes.   Am I missing something? Is there a problem if I just leave that setting enabled even when the OEM auto lens is in place? tia
×
×
  • Create New...