Jump to content

Fuji X-T20 Kit with 18-55mm f2.8-4 or 16-50mm f3.5-5.6 + 50-230mm f4.5-6.7


MaxZ

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

Photography is my hobby for a few years now. Before now I used the Canon eos 600D from my Grandmother, because I never had the money to buy my own camera.

 

This semester (I'm an exchange Student from Germany) I also take a photography class in my High School. And now I really want my first own camera. After comparisons I decided to buy the Fuji X-T20. (My Hostdad bought an used X-T1, since then I’m in love with Fuji Cameras)

The Prices here and in Germany are almost the same so i probably wait until I go back, but I have one big question left: I don’t know which kit I should buy.

In Germany I could get the Fuji X-T20 with the 18-55mm f2.8-4.0 for 1199 . But I could also get the 16-50mm f3.5-5.6 plus the 50-230mm f4.5-6.7 for 1199 €. Now my question: which Kit should I buy? Is the 18-55mm really so much better or should I get the Kit with two lenses?

 

I also want to buy a prime lense, that would be a little bit later then. Maybe the 35mm or 50mm f2.0. (I would be happy about suggestions for the first lens I should buy after the Kit lens!)

 
Link to post
Share on other sites

Get the 18-55 and buy the 50-230mm on its own.

 

There is no doubt that you will be better served by the exceptional quality of the 18-55 compared to the 16-50.

 

With respect this 16-50 is not the complement to a camera like the X-T20, this is the lens made for a camera like the X-A3 , nothing wrong with that but a different animal. If you are into family snapshots and selfies, that is precisely what you need. If you are into more quality oriented photography you don’t want the 16-50.

 

On the other hand, I am a very enthusiastic owner of the 50-230, but I don’t use long focal lenses very much. This is the perfect lens to have for, just in case.

 

Buy the kit lens before and only THEN decide whether you need a prime lens already covered by that!

 

I owned the 35 f1.4 and sold it because I had bought the 18-55 and was not using the 35 anymore.

Edited by milandro
Link to post
Share on other sites

I have heard good things about the cheaper XC lenses, but I would also recommend the XF18-55mm. It is surprisingly good as a kit lens and has a larger aperture than the XC16-50mm. The image quality of the XC16-50mm may be fine, but you will really appreciate the XF18-55mm for shooting in lower light, moving subjects, and more subject isolation with the shallower depth of field. The build quality of the XF18-55mm is also better. When it comes to the telephoto zooms, the XF55-200mm becomes similarly priced to the XC50-230mm during the lens sales Fuji does in the United States (not sure about in Germany). I hope you are enjoying your time here in the US. I hope to get to Germany to visit someday. You have some amazing architecture and so much to see.

Link to post
Share on other sites

In my opinion, if you buy the 16 - 55 f2.8 you'll never look back (though you may then lust for the 50 - 140 f2.8 just to complete things in two perfect zooms).

 

As a 'senior' photographer (so to speak) my main reason for owning my last three Fujifilm cameras is their exceptional lens quality; and I never thought I would find myself using zooms again, until now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Definately buy the kit lens, its a stunner and even though i now have some lovely primes I regret having sold it, and often think of picking another up.

 

At 18mm its the best lens in the line up, I would buy it again and happily use it as a 18mm F2.8 prime. in a kit with my 35mm and 90mm that would be a very very useful walkaround kit.

 

Re prime lens, if you are going to get a prime then get the 35mm F1.4, i know everyone raves about the F2, but if you own the 18-55mm its very sharp at 35mm and focus's very fast, you might as well go for something with bokeh and that prime wow factor from the get go. Again you can pick up a S/H 35mm F1.4 for the same money as the F2 new at the mo which is crazy. Oh and don't listen to the it focus's slow stuff, yes its slower than some of hte newer lenses, but on the X-T2/X-T20 generation it focus's very fast, fast enough for what you will want to use it for, its not for shooting sports, for everything else its now fast enough, especially in SIngle AF mode.

 

G

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Posts

    • X Raw Studio works with image files on your computer - not the image files on the camera card
    • Hello. Thankyou,now Is all more clear: I have take some time in your link. Let tell you. I has totaly forget this machine have "compress picture option" and not Only "compress lossless" anyway not change the experiment. RAW  and this last two format look like same result about Number of recording picture. Can tell all results in this: in raw you can make 17 pictures for second. Is wrong. Is about One single Press and wait buffer. Full 30/20/10/8 not change. After 17 Need Press again. You not can Press before "redgreen light recording Is on".   With preshot you can have 25  are more 7 pictures . The story change Only in jpg shot only. In jpg at 30 you have 30 picture but redgreen light off very Fast so you can shot very quicly. At 20 shot Is about start look like infinite shot. 60. So the best performance are this last One  about Speed and recording picture after camera working witout big limit. I want take a shot about Italy cyclet Just for passion. I think i Will use this last setting.  After Need check when battery not are full change and ambient temp.  Anyway my cam look like exactly specific about you link. Im Happy my cam working perfectly.
    • I do not use Flickr, so I do not know what their BB code is. All I did was copy the second link you provided, (starting at https: and ending at  _k.jpg — leave off the [img] and [/img] tags) and pasted it into the message. After a moment, a message popped up asking if I wanted to paste it as the image or as a plain link. I did this twice, the first time I had it paste in as the image and the second time as a link. Nothing fancy or tricky.
    • So do I just copy the BB code from flickr and paste it anywhere on the page like other forums or is there some other trick I need to perform to get it to post?
×
×
  • Create New...