Jump to content

X-T2 squeaking sound from sensor cleaning


ErikN

Recommended Posts

So, I have had my X-T2 for about 2 weeks now, and in the last two days I noticed a squeaking sound sometimes when turning it off. I sounds like a bird moved in to the camera body, and it can easily be heard from a meter away in a quiet room. Right now it happens every time. I can say for sure that it wasn't there from the beginning.

 

I removed the stabilized lens and it still made the sound, so I went in to the menu and run sensor cleaning manually from there, and it again made the sound, although at a slower rate.

 

It's two squeaks, within a second when turning off the camera, and if done through the menu it's about a twice as long pause between the squeaks. (This tells me that it probably runs the cleaning for a bit longer when done manually through the menu)

 

Have anyone else run into this? I guess I need to contact Fujifilm but I wanted to see if it's a common thing first. It's actually quite annoying and could even be an issue in a quiet space where electronic shutter would otherwise allow for camera use.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Yeah it sure is a challenge to put something this complex together from drawing board to finished product. Low tolerances both in mechanics and electronics. It has to work reliably in all kinds of environments with spot on accuracy.

 

I find it amazing that it's possible to make large quantities of these things and most of them work just as intended. A few are bound to fail, and mine did. Oh well. It works now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Because the sensor assembly is moved electrmagnetically. When there is no power it is essentially free moving.
    • Ahoy ye hearties! Hoist ye yon Jolly Roger and Cascade away. NGC 1502 The Jolly Roger Cluster:

      Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

      Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

      This is the equivalent of 43 minutes, 40 seconds of exposure. NGC 1502 is a neat little cluster located in the Camelopardalis Constellation. This region of space was thought to be fairly empty by early astronomers, but as you can see, there is a lot there. Kemble's Cascade (a.k.a. Kemble 1) is named for Father Lucian Kemble, a Canadian Franciscan friar who wrote about it to Walter Scott Houston, an author for the Sky And Telescope magazine. Houston named the asterism for Fr. Kemble and the name "stuck". NGC 1501 is the Oyster Nebula. A longer focal length telescope is needed to bring this one into good viewing range, but it is well worth the effort. NGC 1502: https://skyandtelescope.org/online-gallery/ngc-1502/ Camelopardalis Constellation: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Camelopardalis Kemble's Cascade (and NGC 1501: The Oyster Nebula): https://www.constellation-guide.com/kembles-cascade/ Arrrrrr Matey.
    • Looking for input; there are some decent deals and might want to take advantage to expand my lenses for my 100s already own: 110/2 32-64 35-70 100-200 + TC   Shooting mostly family shots, bringing my kit to capture family outings indoors and out. Tracking the 63/43 effective FLs on the two, but has anybody used both? Would the 55 (covered by two zooms right now) be redundant? Would the 80 be too similar in character to my 110 for portraiture?
    • See what I mean? Two instantaneous ads. Worthless.   
×
×
  • Create New...