Jump to content
epscott

Dear Fujifilm...

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

You're the one talking crap...as you started the mudslinging out of nowhere when you made it a personal attack in you're very first post. Again, you can continue to troll all you want. Nothing changes.

 

Here, let's remind how you began.

 

":@epscott...... I wouldn't worry about all those features you think you are missing. Your photography could be hugely improved by working on a change of location (same broken pier, beach and swamp in your photo stream) and also, working on composition/lighting. Why bother upgrading or complaining about missing features when you obviously have a huge amount to learn with the camera you have!? 

 

No disrespect meant but after looking through your photo stream it would be wise to put more time and effort in your photography technique than complaining about missing features on a any camera. "

 

And all the while, you won't post your own work. Again, you must be a very socially awkward person IRL if this is how you deal with conflict. 

 

Oh, before I forget...here are some soon to be released CINE lenses, first for E-Mount followed by X-mount cameras...being that it's primarily a camera and not a video camera. LOL

http://www.fujifilm.com/products/optical_devices/tv_cine/cine/mk/mk18_55mm/

 

I have no reason to post my own work.....I'm not the one ranting over the shortcomings (as you called them) of the XT-2! 

 

You say the camera has shortcomings, I don't agree. The XT2 is way better than you are right now....you have a lot learn with it. Master light/composition before you start blaming your tools! 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have no reason to post my own work.....I'm not the one ranting over the shortcomings (as you called them) of the XT-2! 

 

You say the camera has shortcomings, I don't agree. The XT2 is way better than you are right now....you have a lot learn with it. Master light/composition before you start blaming your tools! 

 

 

Before I take advice from you, it's your turn to show your work since you made the accusation against me. If you claim to have the authority to lecture me on light and composition, I highly suggest you post your own work for comparison. Let's see your mastery of composition and light.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Before I take advice from you, it's your turn to show your work since you made the accusation against me. If you claim to have the authority to lecture me on light and composition, I highly suggest you post your own work for comparison. Let's see your mastery of composition and light.

 

I never claimed to be a master of either....but again I'm not the one complaining about how my equipment is holding me back now am I? You are quite happy to lecture Fujifilm on how their cameras have so many shortcomings and how they will fail if they don't listen to your advice.... HA! You a comic genius....I'll give you that! 

/uploads/emoticons/default_laugh.png"> Edited by FotoGeek

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I never claimed to be a master of either....but again I'm not the one complaining about how my equipment is holding me back now am I? You are quite happy to lecture Fujifilm on how their cameras have so many shortcomings and how they will fail if they don't listen to your advice.... HA! You a comic genius....I'll give you that! 

/uploads/emoticons/default_laugh.png">

 

 

Please explain how I said anywhere in this thread that my equipment is holding me back. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Please explain how I said anywhere in this thread that my equipment is holding me back. 

 

Oh dear....do I really have to explain this? 

 

You implied that the lack of certain features was holding you back, you didn't actually say "The lack of features is holding me back"! 

 

"We need fully articulated touch screens. Fully articulated and touch enabled. It's inexcusable. If I'm in front of the camera, I need to be able to see myself or the subject I'm assisting." 

"The next item is IBIS. Now I know that folks are going to groan as they ALWAYS do. Fuji fanatics are passionate about their cameras. But In Body Image Stabilization is a must have." 

 

If the lack of these features were not holding you back then you wouldn't NEED any of them now would you? 

Edited by FotoGeek

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh dear....do I really have to explain this? 

 

You implied that the lack of certain features was holding you back, you didn't actually say "The lack of features is holding me back"! 

 

"We need fully articulated touch screens. Fully articulated and touch enabled. It's inexcusable. If I'm in front of the camera, I need to be able to see myself or the subject I'm assisting." 

"The next item is IBIS. Now I know that folks are going to groan as they ALWAYS do. Fuji fanatics are passionate about their cameras. But In Body Image Stabilization is a must have." 

 

If the lack of these features were not holding you back then you wouldn't NEED any of them now would you? 

 

 

I didn't say it or imply it. YOU and only YOU made that assumption because you just want to argue. The entire post was addressed to Fujifilm, NOT YOU. You aren't a decision maker hence why it was not addressed to you. The features I asked for ALL primarily relate to video hence why I referenced it in my OP. Sure, they have secondary benefits related to photography. But because you're being obtuse and want to argue, you attack me, then whine that I call you on it, then you won't post your own work while simultaneously criticizing mine, then whine again after I call you out. 

 

And here you are continuing to whine. None of these feature requests are holding me back. They would be great to have for the reasons I already stated numerous times but which you choose to ignore. For example and I've already stated this...having a fully articulated screen allows the screen to be folded inward thus protecting itself when not in use. I even provided a picture...a .gif actually. That has nothing to do with my photography and therefore isn't holding me back.

 

Lastly, the only other reason I can think of for you to continue responding to this thread is that you have an obsession for me. While I'm flattered, it's getting a bit creepy. I'm married with children and hetero. Get over it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I didn't say it or imply it. YOU and only YOU made that assumption because you just want to argue. The entire post was addressed to Fujifilm, NOT YOU. You aren't a decision maker hence why it was not addressed to you. The features I asked for ALL primarily relate to video hence why I referenced it in my OP. Sure, they have secondary benefits related to photography. But because you're being obtuse and want to argue, you attack me, then whine that I call you on it, then you won't post your own work while simultaneously criticizing mine, then whine again after I call you out. 

 

And here you are continuing to whine. None of these feature requests are holding me back. They would be great to have for the reasons I already stated numerous times but which you choose to ignore. For example and I've already stated this...having a fully articulated screen allows the screen to be folded inward thus protecting itself when not in use. I even provided a picture...a .gif actually. That has nothing to do with my photography and therefore isn't holding me back.

 

Lastly, the only other reason I can think of for you to continue responding to this thread is that you have an obsession for me. While I'm flattered, it's getting a bit creepy. I'm married with children and hetero. Get over it.

 

 "Cool! Then it's settled. The best way to help Fuji is by not being their customer. Ciao!" ......... I thought after reading this you had finally gone to troll somewhere else but, two days later you quoted me and asked me to respond thus resurrecting the thread. When I respond you then say I attack, I whine, I argue and I'm obsessed with you.....ok, gotcha! 

/uploads/emoticons/default_laugh.png">

 

I'll leave it there because it's like arguing with a spoilt child. You don't do logic nor reason and I will not argue with a fool, as you would bring me down to your level and beat me with experience!

 

Like a previous poster said, you are not worth another second of my time.

 

  •  
  •  
Edited by FotoGeek

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just a joke for Mr. epscott, Advanced Member:

 

- And would you explain how did this happen that your wife lost her mind?

- You see, Doctor, we were travelling in the mountains and there was a tremendous echo, but my wife used to always have the last word in any argument...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

From all the comments so far regarding the "Ultimate X" camera, it looks like IBIS is a constant request for video despite it being "impossible". And what's really weird is how people are saying the same exact thing...like staying competitive with Sony and Canonikon.

 

I really wish fear wouldn't rule people's lives. Growing the business will enable YOU to get even more features that you want...or maybe don't want.

 

I feel like Fuji is on the verge of breaking up the grasp that the big 3 have on the market if they play their cards right. But in business, 1 mistake can kill your company.

 

http://www.fujirumors.com/trusted-sources-says-ultimate-x-series-aps-c-camera-will-cost-around-2000-3000-poll/#disqus_thread

Edited by epscott

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Didn't the article say that IBIS is not possible without loss of image quality (vignetting) in the corners but that that could be digitally corrected? However Fujifilm decided that a compromise like that wasn't in the interest of most x-shooters. Or am I mistaken.

My wish is that Fuji will implement IBIS with digital corrections applied and for those who doesn't like it the function could be turned off and not noticed. Same as with a touch screen. I would accept the extra cost.

Thanks Patrick for your hard work!!

1. This shoot would not be possible without stabilization, IBIS or otherwise.

2. Seems like the same people saying IBIS is unnecessary because of tripods or that it doesn't matter because it can't freeze motion are also arguing OIS is better. Obviously there is a real bennifit in certain situations. More for some than others. Like all other functions in a camera.

 

Pleas accept digital correction of the vignetting. Not noticed if not used.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

IMO, people interested in video are best off with a camera brand specialising in video.

 

And again, I disagree. Look at both the Nikon D90 and the Canon 5D MKII. Game changers, especially the 5D MKII. Then came the attack of the smartphones and here we are. Being a huge fuji fan, I don't want 2 different systems from different manufacturers. If Fuji made a video centric camera that used XF lenses...sure, why not? All I am doing is requesting features that would be useful to me. I have full faith that Fuji knows the path forward where everyone wins. But words like articulated screen, touch screen, IBIS, should not send folks into hysterics. Unfortunately, it seems that politics has crept into every facet of online dialogue where it's ok to go into attack mode over ideas. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1. This shoot would not be possible without stabilization, IBIS or otherwise.

2. Seems like the same people saying IBIS is unnecessary because of tripods or that it doesn't matter because it can't freeze motion are also arguing OIS is better. Obviously there is a real bennifit in certain situations. More for some than others. Like all other functions in a camera.

 

Pleas accept digital correction of the vignetting. Not noticed if not used.

 

1 - use tripod = photo possible

 

This is a constructed photograph, so having the right equipment for the job is not normally a problem

 

OIS or IBIS is useful on long lenses (90mm or longer) that you normally wouldn't be able to handhold at slower shutter speeds (1/60 or slower) without camera shake.

 

Have I ever found myself walking around with my X camera and a lens without OIS, thinking if only i had ibis I'd have got that shot..... no that has never happened.

 

If I shot at less than 1/60s most of the time motion blur is a bigger issue, I don't photograph things that don't move that often and if i was likely to have to shoot at a very slow shutter speed,  I'd take a mono/tri-pod  or a lens with OIS.

I can see why ibis and ois are more useful for video, however no ibis/ois does a better job than a tripod (or another platform technology)

 

tldr.

 

Do I think ibis is needed, no as the lenses that could use it have ois (maybe the 90 f/2 being the only lens that could have used it)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1 - use tripod = photo possible

 

This is a constructed photograph, so having the right equipment for the job is not normally a problem

 

OIS or IBIS is useful on long lenses (90mm or longer) that you normally wouldn't be able to handhold at slower shutter speeds (1/60 or slower) without camera shake.

 

Have I ever found myself walking around with my X camera and a lens without OIS, thinking if only i had ibis I'd have got that shot..... no that has never happened.

 

If I shot at less than 1/60s most of the time motion blur is a bigger issue, I don't photograph things that don't move that often and if i was likely to have to shoot at a very slow shutter speed,  I'd take a mono/tri-pod  or a lens with OIS.

I can see why ibis and ois are more useful for video, however no ibis/ois does a better job than a tripod (or another platform technology)

 

tldr.

 

Do I think ibis is needed, no as the lenses that could use it have ois (maybe the 90 f/2 being the only lens that could have used it)

 

 

Like I said, not possible without stabilization, IBIS or otherwise. Tripod being an example of the otherwise category.

 

As far as having one around for planed shoots. I don't. I don't own one. It's pointless to list reasons and scenarios where it would be perfectly natural not to have a tripod, use wide angel or legacy glass and still need or benefit from stabilization. You are obviously not one that would use IBIS very often. Again, like i said, IBIS like other features is used more or less regularly by different people.

 

In principal, all the arguments you make could be made for not having AF or metering included anymore. Plenty of people use cameras without it and have done so for 2000 years. It's the real way to make pictures!

 

My standpoint is that IBIS is heading towards being a future at that level of commonplace. Arguing it's not needed is just ridiculous. There are plenty of photographers that would benefit, legitimately I may add.

Edited by Martin.W

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

And again, I disagree. Look at both the Nikon D90 and the Canon 5D MKII. Game changers, especially the 5D MKII. Then came the attack of the smartphones and here we are. Being a huge fuji fan, I don't want 2 different systems from different manufacturers. If Fuji made a video centric camera that used XF lenses...sure, why not? All I am doing is requesting features that would be useful to me.

That's all fair, but if video or IBIS are important for your work, why choose a Fujifilm X-series camera then?

 

Instead of buying into a system, and then hoping that the manufacturer adds the features you need, shouldn't it be the other way around?

 

Personally I don't care about video or IBIS (would not object to it though). I do care about size, good primes, and manual controls. If video or IBIS were important for me, I would probably look at Panasonic or Olympus.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

That's all fair, but if video or IBIS are important for your work, why choose a Fujifilm X-series camera then?

 

Instead of buying into a system, and then hoping that the manufacturer adds the features you need, shouldn't it be the other way around?

 

Personally I don't care about video or IBIS (would not object to it though). I do care about size, good primes, and manual controls. If video or IBIS were important for me, I would probably look at Panasonic or Olympus.

Because if I bought Panasonic or Olympus, I'd be giving up all the things that I want from a stills camera.

 

I want 1 camera, 1 camera system.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Because if I bought Panasonic or Olympus, I'd be giving up all the things that I want from a stills camera.

 

I want 1 camera, 1 camera system.

Yes, and I want a BMW GS bike with shaft drive, 150hp boxer engine, and a weight of only 100kg.

 

You can't always have everything in just one device.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, and I want a BMW GS bike with shaft drive, 150hp boxer engine, and a weight of only 100kg.

 

You can't always have everything in just one device.

 

You can tell BMW to make one or else........

/uploads/emoticons/default_laugh.png"> 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, and I want a BMW GS bike with shaft drive, 150hp boxer engine, and a weight of only 100kg.

 

You can't always have everything in just one device.

Except in this case, all the things I brought up are not only possible but are in fact realities in other cameras. In your example, are you asking for things that aren't even possible? Yes or No?

 

But I do hear and understand what you're saying. I get it. I just have a different perspective and it doesn't align with your position.

 

But I'll ask again, why is a fully articulated touchscreen not possible? What are the obstacles? Show me. Put it in writing. Give me something to believe in. As I've stated before, it's not enough to say you believe in something. Being able to say WHY you believe it is the most critical aspect.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you read back; my comment was not on your wish for an articulated touch screen but on your desire to have better video capabilities.

 

I'd rather have Fujifilm make a very good stills camera than a camera that tries to incorporate video capabilities, if that leads to a bulkier camera or a higher price tag.

 

If they can make an articulated screen as slim and as reliable as a fixed one, then I am all for it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Epscott

 

Please stop saying people are triggered when they simply disagree with you, its a phrase that should be saved for serious situations where someone has suffered a form of abuse and the content being discussed is genuinely likely to cause them emotional distress, trivializing its use as a put down in a thread such as this belittles you and this forum.

 

G

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

  • Posts

    • I do not believe that it is the video features that caused the increase in size and weight. It is the added IBIS.  
    • ditto, some of my beat BNW shots are from my XE1
    • Not enough information here. I assume you have downloaded to a computer? What type of computer and which operating system? How did you download the files and how are you viewing them? Which application are you using? How do you know you are getting 1920x1080 resolution? Are you viewing the raw file or the jpg? If this is the jpg what jpg settings did you use in the camera?
    • Brought back the X-T30 today and tried 3 in store - all exhibited same issue in varying degrees of yellow tint.  I was offered a refund but opted to try more as I shop regularly at the store. They have contacted Fujifilm to order others from possibly another batch to test.  Absolute joke in my opinion.    My X-E2s, X-T1 and evening X-M1 do t exhibit this problem.    I did order a 2nd X-E2s when B&H had a sale and it had the issue and had to be sent back also a few years
    • Hi,    I have the Fuji X-A5 and it's been working fine the last few weeks. But after my last session all the images I downloaded are at resolution 1920x1080. The odd thing is that their file size is still 40MB+ I usually shoot just raw but I changed it too Raw+Fine so I could preview the full images in camera. So does anyone know whats going on here?   Regards, Tommy  
×
×
  • Create New...