Jump to content

Inexpensive macro option for X pro - adapter and lens combo


Recommended Posts

I would love to have the option to  take some macro images with my X pro cameras ( 1&2) I don't really want to buy a macro lens that I will use a couple times a year.

 

What options are their for older lenses and adapters - even extension tubes on existing lenses.

 

I've been doing this a long time, but never got into macro, so some suggestions would be great.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

It definitely would be better to use real macro lens, even old one (also auto-focus is not really useful in this case).

 

You could buy Canon FD 50mm Macro with tubes for 50$ + adapter - basically same price as for Macro Extension Tubes MCEX-11 / MCEX-16.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My solution is a Tamron SP 90mm f/2.8 Adaptall-II (model 72B) which gives me 1:1 magnification and a comfortable working distance for just under £90.

 

Doesn't have the same reputation as the earlier 90mm f/2.5, so prices tend to stay low.

 

(Edit: some details here)

 

On my X-T1:

28979766455_e51873380a_c.jpg

strawberry by Jean-Yves, on Flickr

 

28979766685_5250ca9c2c_c.jpg

greenongreen by Jean-Yves, on Flickr

Edited by ruby.monkey
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Because the sensor assembly is moved electrmagnetically. When there is no power it is essentially free moving.
    • Ahoy ye hearties! Hoist ye yon Jolly Roger and Cascade away. NGC 1502 The Jolly Roger Cluster:

      Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

      Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

      This is the equivalent of 43 minutes, 40 seconds of exposure. NGC 1502 is a neat little cluster located in the Camelopardalis Constellation. This region of space was thought to be fairly empty by early astronomers, but as you can see, there is a lot there. Kemble's Cascade (a.k.a. Kemble 1) is named for Father Lucian Kemble, a Canadian Franciscan friar who wrote about it to Walter Scott Houston, an author for the Sky And Telescope magazine. Houston named the asterism for Fr. Kemble and the name "stuck". NGC 1501 is the Oyster Nebula. A longer focal length telescope is needed to bring this one into good viewing range, but it is well worth the effort. NGC 1502: https://skyandtelescope.org/online-gallery/ngc-1502/ Camelopardalis Constellation: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Camelopardalis Kemble's Cascade (and NGC 1501: The Oyster Nebula): https://www.constellation-guide.com/kembles-cascade/ Arrrrrr Matey.
    • Looking for input; there are some decent deals and might want to take advantage to expand my lenses for my 100s already own: 110/2 32-64 35-70 100-200 + TC   Shooting mostly family shots, bringing my kit to capture family outings indoors and out. Tracking the 63/43 effective FLs on the two, but has anybody used both? Would the 55 (covered by two zooms right now) be redundant? Would the 80 be too similar in character to my 110 for portraiture?
    • See what I mean? Two instantaneous ads. Worthless.   
×
×
  • Create New...