Jump to content

Harsh Light


Brooklynboy

Recommended Posts

I'm not sure if I'm doing anything wrong. I tried taking a photo of something that was lit up. However, the object was not as bright as this processed picture. In real life, the light was not this strong. I could see the skin color of the face.  Is my exposure wrong? Is my Lightroom editing wrong? Is it the Fuji X-T2?

 

I tried lowering the Highlights or Whites, but it just looks awful.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Edited by Brooklynboy
Link to post
Share on other sites

May be your metering mode?

 

The background is dark and the subject bright - the camera will average out the exposure giving you a dark-ish background and very bright subject.

 

If you set the metering zone to a point and place this on the subject, then the face would look right and the background would probably go black.

 

Or use exposure compensation.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, your eye has about 20 stops of dynamic range, your camera a fair bit less. So what you see is not what you can capture. For things like this it is best to use spot metering, or underexpose a bit (look at the histogram). If the highlights are not blown you could try lowering the exposure in Lightroom (you are using the RAW I hope), and then raise the shadows back.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your camera (properly)  raised the exposure for the background resulting in overexposed highlights.

 

Metering (what the camera does) and the exposure is what the photographer sets.

 

The camera meters.

 

The photographer sets the exposure.

 

I would expect to dial the exposure down 2 stops in such a scene and that is perfectly normal.

 

Blown highlights are not very recoverable in LR.

 

Shadows are very easy to recover.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Like others have said, you overexposed.

Some ways you could handle this in the future:

 

  • Use spot metering and point it at the bright part of the elf's face.
  • Matrix metering and use Exp Comp dial to lower the exposure to see fit (using the WYSIWYG screen)
  • Manual Exposure and adjust your ISO, shutter, and/or aperture to get your desired exposure of the elf's face  (using the WYSIWYG screen). 
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Ahoy ye hearties! Hoist ye yon Jolly Roger and Cascade away. NGC 1502 The Jolly Roger Cluster:

      Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

      Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

      This is the equivalent of 43 minutes, 40 seconds of exposure. NGC 1502 is a neat little cluster located in the Camelopardalis Constellation. This region of space was thought to be fairly empty by early astronomers, but as you can see, there is a lot there. Kemble's Cascade (a.k.a. Kemble 1) is named for Father Lucian Kemble, a Canadian Franciscan friar who wrote about it to Walter Scott Houston, an author for the Sky And Telescope magazine. Houston named the asterism for Fr. Kemble and the name "stuck". NGC 1501 is the Oyster Nebula. A longer focal length telescope is needed to bring this one into good viewing range, but it is well worth the effort. NGC 1502: https://skyandtelescope.org/online-gallery/ngc-1502/ Camelopardalis Constellation: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Camelopardalis Kemble's Cascade (and NGC 1501: The Oyster Nebula): https://www.constellation-guide.com/kembles-cascade/ Arrrrrr Matey.
    • Looking for input; there are some decent deals and might want to take advantage to expand my lenses for my 100s already own: 110/2 32-64 35-70 100-200 + TC   Shooting mostly family shots, bringing my kit to capture family outings indoors and out. Tracking the 63/43 effective FLs on the two, but has anybody used both? Would the 55 (covered by two zooms right now) be redundant? Would the 80 be too similar in character to my 110 for portraiture?
    • See what I mean? Two instantaneous ads. Worthless.   
    • What's the deal Fuji X Forum? I'm noticing there are seldom replies to any topics - except for advertisements posted as replies. Really lame. Anyone else noticing the only reply they receive to a question is an advert?  🤠 fotomatt in Colorado  
×
×
  • Create New...