Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Why wasn't Full Frame mentioned in any of the poll questions?

 

I know it's what I want to see from Fuji more than anything, it's always brought up on forums and has been since day 1 of the x100. The support for Fuji to make a FF seem overwhelming.

And with the recent news of FF A7 cameras sending Sony's mirrorless sales way up...

And Leica dropping a FF with fixed lens next week...

It just seems relevant.

 

The world is waiting for a FF x100!

 

(And Ideally one with a fast 50mm :) )

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why not, but can you explain why you'd want that?

 

Do you print really big? Do you feel you'd need better low light capability, or shallower dof?

 

Why would that be worth the weight and size penalty in your opinion?

Link to post
Share on other sites

While the Sony is great, it's also more expensive.....not too sure I like to see Fujifilm getting more expensive than it is now.

 

Just spoke to someone who jumped the wagon from Canon dslr to an A7s. 2 things, expensive glass and still can't chase his kiddos. It's the only system where he felt he had to adapt and still trying to. :unsure:

 

FF or not it doesn't matter to me but 24mpix may be good.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not to mention all of the Sony Mirrorless are full frame.  That is where Sony has chose to invest.  Fuji chose the APS-C and they are developing an entire line of lenses on this sensor size.  Sony is doing the same for full frame.

 

I looked into the A7 series before I bought my X-T1 and settled on the X-T1 (naturally) because of glass, cost, size, and Fuji's great ability and willingness to respond to their customer base.  The Sony's are very nice though, and I know there are a lot of photographers who use and love the A7's...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just spoke to someone who jumped the wagon from Canon dslr to an A7s. 2 things, expensive glass and still can't chase his kiddos. It's the only system where he felt he had to adapt and still trying to. :unsure:

 

Well the A7S isn't really good at "fast" moving subject, a lot things were sacrificed to the low light capability, image resolution being one and auto focus speed being the second. In really dark conditions it's second to none but that's certainly not a body I would take for "generic" shooting, specially not kids.

 

Heck, with my active son even the 35mm prime on X-T1 has focusing speed issues, a lot of time he is blurry if you look closely.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've been a professional photographer for 15 years (and keen amateur for 20 years before that) and the A7s is the first camera I've ever used that I didn't immediately know how to operate. Canon, Fuji, Nikon are all easy - Sony is altogether different.

 

Personally, I don't care if it's got amazing image quality, the user interface just didn't work for me. Compare that with Fuji, which I picked up for the first time and was instantly engaged and able to use and it's like chalk and cheese.

 

Moving to a crop camera was something I never thought I'd do - I'd resisted digital until the full frame 5D came out, but I find the ability to shoot wide open with perfect sharpness compensates for the lower DOF. I'll be happy if Fuji concentrate on making the most of the crop sensor, perhaps with a higher MP camera plus a lower noise version at current MP count in the future.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well the A7S isn't really good at "fast" moving subject, a lot things were sacrificed to the low light capability, image resolution being one and auto focus speed being the second. In really dark conditions it's second to none but that's certainly not a body I would take for "generic" shooting, specially not kids.

 

Heck, with my active son even the 35mm prime on X-T1 has focusing speed issues, a lot of time he is blurry if you look closely.

 

I know what you mean. You're fortunate you have the X-T1. I'm on the X-Pro1!.....it's easier to ask my kiddo to stay still or pose! :lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not to mention all of the Sony Mirrorless are full frame.  That is where Sony has chose to invest.  Fuji chose the APS-C and they are developing an entire line of lenses on this sensor size.  Sony is doing the same for full frame.

 

I looked into the A7 series before I bought my X-T1 and settled on the X-T1 (naturally) because of glass, cost, size, and Fuji's great ability and willingness to respond to their customer base.  The Sony's are very nice though, and I know there are a lot of photographers who use and love the A7's...

I absolutely love the files from the A7s.....it's really very good.

 

Perhaps when processor speed moves up a notch or two......

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not to mention all of the Sony Mirrorless are full frame.  That is where Sony has chose to invest.  Fuji chose the APS-C and they are developing an entire line of lenses on this sensor size.  Sony is doing the same for full frame.

 

I looked into the A7 series before I bought my X-T1 and settled on the X-T1 (naturally) because of glass, cost, size, and Fuji's great ability and willingness to respond to their customer base.  The Sony's are very nice though, and I know there are a lot of photographers who use and love the A7's...

I did the same too before I picked up the X-Pro1.

 

Looks like the new LEICA Q is going to give the Sony a run for its money.....well, almost the same amount of money, give or take a thousand or two...

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've been a professional photographer for 15 years (and keen amateur for 20 years before that) and the A7s is the first camera I've ever used that I didn't immediately know how to operate. Canon, Fuji, Nikon are all easy - Sony is altogether different.

 

Personally, I don't care if it's got amazing image quality, the user interface just didn't work for me. Compare that with Fuji, which I picked up for the first time and was instantly engaged and able to use and it's like chalk and cheese.

 

Moving to a crop camera was something I never thought I'd do - I'd resisted digital until the full frame 5D came out, but I find the ability to shoot wide open with perfect sharpness compensates for the lower DOF. I'll be happy if Fuji concentrate on making the most of the crop sensor, perhaps with a higher MP camera plus a lower noise version at current MP count in the future.

 

Yeah, spot on. No interest in returning to FF, could do with some extra resolution, 24mp should about do it. That said, if they brought out a high resolution version for lower ISO operation for studio work, I'd be up for one of those as well!

 

I like the developments Sony are making, I just couldn't go back to them though. I've seen some of their test shots with lenses wide open and they don't really compare to Fuji. Stepped down a touch and they are awesome but the controls and menu diving..... no, just no!  

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

      Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

       
    • Anyone out there have any experience/feedback on the Laowa 55 mm tilt shift? I’d be using it on the GFX 50s ii. 
    • Hi, I'm researching a gimbal to get someone as a present & they use a Fuji XS-10. I did a quick search of previous threads on gimbals but all of them seem to either get no replies or spammed by a link to an Amazon list. I'd appreciate any comments from folks who've actually used specific gimbals with the XS-10. I'm aware that some, such as certain models from Zhiyun, DJI & FeiyuTech either don't say that they are fully compatible with the XS-10 but other sites say they do work ok but some functions don't. It's quite difficult to work out which functions work & which don't. Thanks.
    • Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

      Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

       
    • This was snapped during a lunch.  Total shooting time—a few seconds. We so often read that a proper "portrait" should be snapped with a longer than normal lens, a low ISO to get lots of detail, and have a soft light held up above the head, and slightly to the side. The key, in my opinion, is always carry a camera.  Have your camera available to capture candid, authentic photographs.  Available light, no posing.   This portrait used 2000 ISO, the lens wide open at f4, and 1/100 sec. to stop any movement.  I didn't even take time to compose—I just snapped.  I leave the "Face Detection" on unless I'm photographing a landscape or subject other than a person. The GFX100RF has the equivalent of a 28mm lens.  The large sensor renders fine detail even at fairly high ISO ratings.  And the drawing of the lens is just perfect in my opinion.  It was set to B & W, with slightly reduced sharpness and clarity (set in-camera).  Ideal for "portraits."  Now, for some subjects I will likely increase the sharpness and clarity to the normal setting.  The camera is new, and I'm still experimenting with it.

      Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

      Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

×
×
  • Create New...