Jump to content

Compact Travel Video Rig


corama

Recommended Posts

questions for video folks.... any clues?

1. I'm looking for a very compact stabilization rig for X-T2 to make quick videos (specially while walking) that can fit in my travel bag. I do not need pro grade rigs, just want to avoid getting a headache every time I watch the videos....

2. would the AF noise of the 23 1.4 or 56 be picked by camera mic?? should I use an external mic instead?

thanks!

Link to post
Share on other sites

At some point in the future I want to explore the video functionality of my X-T2 as well. I was looking at:

- Feiyu MG gimbal http://www.feiyu-tech.com/products/31/ (around 650-800 euro)

- Sirui video monopod http://www.sirui.eu/en/products/monopods/ps-series/ (around 170-300 euro voor monopod only, 150 euro voor fluid video head)

 

Cheaper option is a steadycam, like the Ringlight Steadycam Stabilizer S40 for 150 euro.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did some tests in my X-T1 with the 18-55mm F2.8-4 OIS.  Standing still, I can shoot video as on a tripod.  When walking on smooth ground, if I work really hard, I can shoot smooth video.  Sometimes.  Rough ground, there is too much motion.  35mm seems to be the limit where it starts to look really bad.  

 

The worse is the pan, as the OIS seems to allow pan mode and look at just tilt stabilized.  Then the pan stops abruptly and reverse.  Really not good enough.  

 

I'll have to try it with a folded up tripod or monopod for some more mass, but I would have no problems with video from a still position.  Especially with a monopod in the mix.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Make sure to pick up ND filters for the lenses with which you want to shoot video.  In sunlight, I had to use stacked 8, 4, and 2 stop ND filters to get the frame rate down to 1/60 at ISO 200 and 2.8 aperture (These are cheap ND filters so they may be only 10-12 stops total.  If you haven't done much video, you need to keep the shutter speed at about 2x frame rate for smooth looking video.  Otherwise, you get strobing instead of motion blur.  That makes video much harder to watch. 

Edited by sacherjj
Link to post
Share on other sites

@sacherjj

 

Make sure to pick up ND filters for the lenses with which you want to shoot video.  In sunlight, I had to use stacked 8, 4, and 2 stop ND filters to get the frame rate down to 1/60 at ISO 200 and 2.8 aperture (These are cheap ND filters so they may be only 10-12 stops total.  If you haven't done much video, you need to keep the shutter speed at about 2x frame rate for smooth looking video.  Otherwise, you get strobing instead of motion blur.  That makes video much harder to watch. 

 

Good to know, thanks for the advice, I do have a ND, but  I think is only a 4. Will work if I shoot at f8 or f16 to get to 1/60? just to test what you say and then after I get some experience I may get more ND filters.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • The yellowing issue has always been easily fixed in my experience. It's a result of the presence of Thorium. it can be greatly or eliminated by exposure to UV light, so I've on occasion simply left a lens on the window sill for a few days. It also kills fungus, but fungus can create unrecoverable etchings in the glass if it is particularly aggressive. Note: this can be done on cloudy days. UV light penetrates the clouds. Next note: We're speaking a lens and possibly strong sunlight here. It could create a risk of fire the orientation of the lens and its configuration leads to it focusing on a spot. I use tinfoil at the camera end of the lens. It reflects the UV light back up the barrel, giving a double bath to the lenses. 
    • Cheers! I hope to enjoy it as much as I have enjoyed the Spottie I grew up with and which will remain in my bag for life not simply in my bag, but with a roll of film in it, and more to come. I'm coming at the XT5 from a very weird angle. It sort of goes back to unpreparedness. I found myself with my Spotmatic in "the Garden of Ireland" - Wicklow - beautiful county. I was spending a week exploring its beautiful valleys. When the batteries on my Spotmatic failed, I reached into my rucksack for a replacement set. There were none. So I shrugged and decided I had to use my eyes to meter. Things were cheaper then. When picking up processed films the photos came with a new film thrown in, so it was easier to take that decision. Within a few months I was getting nearly 100% keepers - at least in terms of focus and exposure. So circumstances forced me to be ever vigilant of light. I've had many other cameras since then, but the bare bones (it doesn't even have a self-timer) Spotmatic was an ever-present. Expense has forced my hand, though. That and some curiosity. I feel as if my first car is a Ferrari! In fact, when I explained at the shop that I was an experienced photographer looking for a digital which placed the emphasis on stills, they tried to force a €7k model on me. That would be a step too far. Thus my experience in approaching this camera is somewhat unusual. Thus far I have had great enjoyment with it. I was thrilled on opening to box to discover that I was getting utter rubbish from it. Yes!!! I had to learn how to use it! Praise the Lord! I also found a magic button which was the answer to my dreams - the diopter adjustment. That's how naive I was (and am) about the digital offerings - this was an enormous and hugely welcome surprise. I've been learning. The supplied kit lens is not ideal - a 16-80mm zoom. It's pretty sharp, but demanding in manual mode. My old glass reminds me of my father's Opel Senator, which was forgiving to the point that it would comfortably take off at the lights even if you'd mistakenly selected third. My old glass is much more forgiving. At the moment, I'm leaving everything to automatic ISO. I'll wean myself away from that quickly enough, though. in the past I'd retrofitted my son's lenses to my older kit, and found that you needed to be much more precise. I guess when you're designing something which will be adjusted by algorithms then you can make the continuum as tight as you want. My son laughs at me. "You have bracketing mode if you want, Dad.", he'll remind me. "Use burst mode.", he'll add. Some of my habits are deeply ingrained, though. Two other things people find odd about my photography: I never ever use post-processing - what comes out of the camera is the final product. Secondly, I have never once taken photos where the subject is a human being without first requiring a lot of persuasion. 
    • Seconding this! Would be nice to preview a desqueezed image in camera + output it via HDMI.
    • I found my answer. Actually you can assign the profile from a .dng conversion but not from a .tiff conversion. I hadn’t double checked the .dng option.
×
×
  • Create New...