Jump to content

Infrared with X-T1 IR

Guest

By Guest
in Landscape & Travel

 Share

Recommended Posts

Guest

Guest

Posted
Posted

Finally, the last Sunday, I found some time to take my X-T1 IR for a walk. Not so far - just to the wood next to my home. This time black & white, but as I set my camera to write both RAW and BW, probably I will post also the color versions soon. You can see some pictures here:

 

http://eng.roguski.eu/2016/09/27/fujifilm-x-t1-ir-black-white-in-infrared/#more-145

 

I used 35mm f/2 - well, probably XF 10-24 would be more comfortable, but first tests have shown definitely that this lens is really poor for IR and ruins all the pictures. So now I have been thinking very hard what wide lens to use for IR.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest

Guest

Posted
Posted

What problem do you get with the 35mm f/2 for infrared? Looking at the images, I can't see any hotspots, so just wondered...

35mm works fine - I just need a bit wider option. The 10-24 does not work - it shows huge hot spot in the center, very sharp and visible at 10mm and a bit softer at 24mm.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 2 years later...
andy peet Newbie

andy peet

Posted
Posted

Hello all, similar situation (X-T10 IR converted to 720nm) difficulties finding best lenses-tried numerous ones with poor effects, consulted numerous specialists Inc.: Kolarvision & Jasonfriend websites. I can't really justify purchasing the Zeis 12mm or Fuji 14mm-though would love to.

I understand the Samyang/Rokinon 10mm is worthwhile considering-but am enquiring if anyone has used a 7artisans 12mm for IR photography? they look reasonable, get decent reviews & are well priced. many thanks for your advice

Regards andy p

Link to post
Share on other sites
idwilson Apprentice

idwilson

Posted
Posted

Based on personal experience, good IR lenses are: 14/2.8; 16/1.4; 23 (both versions); 35/1.4; 35/2 (up to f/8); and 50-140/2.8.  Other wide angles (10-24/4, Samyang 8 fisheye and 12) have bad hot spots.  Sadly, if you want a wide angle lens for IR photography, the number of choices are limited.  

Link to post
Share on other sites
andy peet Newbie

andy peet

Posted
Posted

Hello & thank you  for your advice-a good list to note

Agree, not straightforward-I had a Nikon D70 IR converted to 650nm back from the day & used it frequently (to reasonable results) with a cheap dx 18-55 lense. Alas, not the same luck with Fuji (I changed systems completely 3 years ago) though I do prefer their bodies/lenses-they simply have more 'substance' 

I don't know how many lenses/websites/enquiries I've made over the last 6 months. I've purchased several lenses/bodies of eBay-only to send them back sorrowfully; due to the notorious hotspots at higher f stops. I'll be sending an xc 15-45 back tomorrow-which I bought on a recommendation from a pro. photographer who blogs about IR  too

My 2 lenses (10-24 & 18-55)  are great on the X-T2, but on the X-T10 are absolutely disastrous. The challenge is a decent wide-angle (ultra) lense is £400 upwards (I'm thinking 14mm, 18-135mm or Zeiss Touit 12mm) which compared to the price of the body (£290) is quite an offset; hence my 7artisans enquiry

If I am unable to get positive feedback about the 7artisans, I think I'll sell the 18-55 & purchase an 18-135 which will kill 2 birds; or get flush & buy the Zeiss!  Thank you again for your advice (I'll check their prices on eBay) 

regards andy p 

PS-do you know if ND filters will work with an IR converted body? 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest

Guest

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, andy peet said:

...

If I am unable to get positive feedback about the 7artisans, I think I'll sell the 18-55 & purchase an 18-135 which will kill 2 birds; or get flush & buy the Zeiss!  Thank you again for your advice (I'll check their prices on eBay) 

...

Forget about 18-135 for infrared photography in color - look here: http://eng.roguski.eu/2019/04/22/sunny-afternoon-on-the-banks-of-the-vistula/

This lens can be used for B&W infrared only. The hotspot is huge and awful.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest

Guest

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, andy peet said:

Hello & thank you. unfortunately, i cannot see any hotspots on your 2 colour images? regards andy p 

If you have closer look at the center of each image, you will see pink-ish tint on the foliage - it should be white and not pink.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • BobJ
      X-T5 Cleaning Mistake

      By BobJ · Posted

      Because the sensor assembly is moved electrmagnetically. When there is no power it is essentially free moving.
    • jerryy
      Astro-photography (open thread)

      By jerryy · Posted

      Ahoy ye hearties! Hoist ye yon Jolly Roger and Cascade away. NGC 1502 The Jolly Roger Cluster:

      Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

      Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

      This is the equivalent of 43 minutes, 40 seconds of exposure. NGC 1502 is a neat little cluster located in the Camelopardalis Constellation. This region of space was thought to be fairly empty by early astronomers, but as you can see, there is a lot there. Kemble's Cascade (a.k.a. Kemble 1) is named for Father Lucian Kemble, a Canadian Franciscan friar who wrote about it to Walter Scott Houston, an author for the Sky And Telescope magazine. Houston named the asterism for Fr. Kemble and the name "stuck". NGC 1501 is the Oyster Nebula. A longer focal length telescope is needed to bring this one into good viewing range, but it is well worth the effort. NGC 1502: https://skyandtelescope.org/online-gallery/ngc-1502/ Camelopardalis Constellation: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Camelopardalis Kemble's Cascade (and NGC 1501: The Oyster Nebula): https://www.constellation-guide.com/kembles-cascade/ Arrrrrr Matey.
    • Greybeard
      Only comments are baited ads

      By Greybeard · Posted

    • BIGOAK
      55 or 80?

      By BIGOAK · Posted

      Looking for input; there are some decent deals and might want to take advantage to expand my lenses for my 100s already own: 110/2 32-64 35-70 100-200 + TC   Shooting mostly family shots, bringing my kit to capture family outings indoors and out. Tracking the 63/43 effective FLs on the two, but has anybody used both? Would the 55 (covered by two zooms right now) be redundant? Would the 80 be too similar in character to my 110 for portraiture?
    • Fotomatt
      Only comments are baited ads

      By Fotomatt · Posted

      See what I mean? Two instantaneous ads. Worthless.   
×
×
  • Create New...