Jump to content

Underwater housing for XT2


hequitzphoto

Recommended Posts

the camera has been out for just a few weeks ...give them time and the same people who made the housing for the X-T1 will make the housings for the X-T2, unlike Fuji (which doesn’t make housings) they need the physical camera which has still to become available for a lot of people out there!

Edited by milandro
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Hey.

Ive been thinking of buying the Xt2 for a while now.

Also waiting on a housing to become available.

I did see the other day that Salty Housings have just made a housing for it, and added it to their stock list. This company is getting great reviews since entering the market.

Also, aquatech I think are not far off releasing one, they posted today they are in test mode of their housing for it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • 3 weeks later...
  • 11 months later...

Hmmm - I love my X-T2 setup - but the cost of moving to UW is higgghhhhh

 

Everyone else seems to use a Sony A7 R II here in the Philippines.

I know I am taking a lot of $$ to 40m but has anyone found a good setup? 

(I have Body + 60mm macro + what next??, what strobes etc?)

Edited by newboy
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • X Raw Studio works with image files on your computer - not the image files on the camera card
    • Hello. Thankyou,now Is all more clear: I have take some time in your link. Let tell you. I has totaly forget this machine have "compress picture option" and not Only "compress lossless" anyway not change the experiment. RAW  and this last two format look like same result about Number of recording picture. Can tell all results in this: in raw you can make 17 pictures for second. Is wrong. Is about One single Press and wait buffer. Full 30/20/10/8 not change. After 17 Need Press again. You not can Press before "redgreen light recording Is on".   With preshot you can have 25  are more 7 pictures . The story change Only in jpg shot only. In jpg at 30 you have 30 picture but redgreen light off very Fast so you can shot very quicly. At 20 shot Is about start look like infinite shot. 60. So the best performance are this last One  about Speed and recording picture after camera working witout big limit. I want take a shot about Italy cyclet Just for passion. I think i Will use this last setting.  After Need check when battery not are full change and ambient temp.  Anyway my cam look like exactly specific about you link. Im Happy my cam working perfectly.
    • I do not use Flickr, so I do not know what their BB code is. All I did was copy the second link you provided, (starting at https: and ending at  _k.jpg — leave off the [img] and [/img] tags) and pasted it into the message. After a moment, a message popped up asking if I wanted to paste it as the image or as a plain link. I did this twice, the first time I had it paste in as the image and the second time as a link. Nothing fancy or tricky.
    • So do I just copy the BB code from flickr and paste it anywhere on the page like other forums or is there some other trick I need to perform to get it to post?
×
×
  • Create New...