Jump to content

Will x-t2 improve autofocus speed on slower lens?


EBC811

Recommended Posts

Hi, I currently own x-t10 and a few lenses.  One of the lenses I really like is XC 50-230mm but it has terrible autofocusing speed.  I only use it during the day since

autofocus is very frustrating in low light.  I read X-T2 will have improved autofocusing and does that translate into better performance with xc 50-230mm?

thank you for your input. :D

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Only to a certain point, some older lenses have a large lens group to move, this will remain relatively slow as it's the motor inside the lens that takes time to move, but the newer sensor will improve the accuracy and reduce the hunting.

 

But don't expect your 35 F1.4 to be as fast one of the lenses with linear motors, that is still not going to happen.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You are probably right about the linear motor. With the 35, I did perceive a quicker lock on than before on the Pro2. This makes it seem it is faster to be able to press the shutter to take the shot.

 

I took the slowest focusing xf lenses and coupled it with the Pro2. The difference is quite significant compared to my Pro1 and a friend's T1.

 

Lenses were the 60, 56, 35 and the 55-200.

 

The 60 snapped into focus quicker than I'm used to. I've had good success with the 56 on the go kart and the 55-200 was very quick too with birds. The 35 is still as noisy but hunt less and was more decisive.

 

I'm not sure how close is the AF performance of the T10 compared to the T2 but I highly suspect it will be trumped over.

 

I've had a try on the T2 for about an hour and I can say that the AF is much better than the Pro2.

Edited by Aswald
Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd really like to know this regarding the 56mm 1.2. I recently got one for my X-T10 and I have to admit as fantastic as the image quality is, I found the autofocus performance a bit disappointing. Even with a reasonable sized focus point it still hunts a lot. If the performance is noticeably improved on an X-T2 then it may sway me to look at upgrading. 

Edited by BodKat
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Ahoy ye hearties! Hoist ye yon Jolly Roger and Cascade away. NGC 1502 The Jolly Roger Cluster:

      Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

      Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

      This is the equivalent of 43 minutes, 40 seconds of exposure. NGC 1502 is a neat little cluster located in the Camelopardalis Constellation. This region of space was thought to be fairly empty by early astronomers, but as you can see, there is a lot there. Kemble's Cascade (a.k.a. Kemble 1) is named for Father Lucian Kemble, a Canadian Franciscan friar who wrote about it to Walter Scott Houston, an author for the Sky And Telescope magazine. Houston named the asterism for Fr. Kemble and the name "stuck". NGC 1501 is the Oyster Nebula. A longer focal length telescope is needed to bring this one into good viewing, but it is well worth the effort. NGC 1502: https://skyandtelescope.org/online-gallery/ngc-1502/ Camelopardalis Constellation: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Camelopardalis Kemble's Cascade (and NGC 1501: The Oyster Nebula): https://www.constellation-guide.com/kembles-cascade/  
    • Looking for input; there are some decent deals and might want to take advantage to expand my lenses for my 100s already own: 110/2 32-64 35-70 100-200 + TC   Shooting mostly family shots, bringing my kit to capture family outings indoors and out. Tracking the 63/43 effective FLs on the two, but has anybody used both? Would the 55 (covered by two zooms right now) be redundant? Would the 80 be too similar in character to my 110 for portraiture?
    • See what I mean? Two instantaneous ads. Worthless.   
    • What's the deal Fuji X Forum? I'm noticing there are seldom replies to any topics - except for advertisements posted as replies. Really lame. Anyone else noticing the only reply they receive to a question is an advert?  🤠 fotomatt in Colorado  
×
×
  • Create New...