Jump to content

Fujifilm XF23mmF1.4 R LM WR malfunction


Piero

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone,
the intent of this post is to gather information on possible other cases of malfunction on the lens in the title.
The lens has been sent back for 'tech check' already, so I'm not complaining against anyone.
I've purchased my sample from my usual reseller in Milan, whom I trust and deal with since 2003. I say this in order to erase any possible consideration regarding the provenience of my lens, or the handling, or storage or whatever.


To make a long story short:
bought a couple of lenses and a new camera body (XH2) to give rest to my X-Pro1 which I've been using for 10 years as my note book with much satisfaction. Fujinon lenses I know well and have used with great satisfaction are the 35 ƒ1.4, the 35 ƒ2.0, 23 ƒ1.4 (why did I sell thais one a few years ago? God knows...), the 56 ƒ1.2, so I know what to expect from Fuji.
I've used the GFX system with wide lenses to shoot interiors and so on and so forth.


Let's go back to the 23 in question. Lens won't focus properly, definition is poor at any given aperture setting, in both manual focus or autofocus, mechanical shutter or electronic, IS ON or OFF, tripod or hand held.
It made an unusual sound when I was handling it or mounting it on camera. A soft clonk that got worse rapidly, as if there was something lose inside.
Looking through the lens - unmounted - I could se the inner lens group going back and forth, not the front lens not the rear lens. 
I attach a short clip with the sound it makes. Volume ON

Has anyone experinced the same - Or - is it considered 'normal'? 😁

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

UPDATE:

I visited my supplier last tuesday, he sent the lens for inspection in Portugal (where Fujifilm has moved tech assistance after BREXIT). They will keep it for a few weeks.
While I was in the shop we inspected another copy of the lens and, regarding the sound it made and the visible moovemnet of the lens group, it was exactly like mine. So some noice and worrisome moving parts are to be considered normal.
He also told me that just a day before a cutomer had bough a Canon R5 and immediately after he returned to the shop arguing on the noise of loose parts within camera and lens: it appears to be normal. IBIS and lens image stabilization feels aukward, indeed, but apparently are normal in nowaday.

Once the lens returns in my possession I'll write the diagnose

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wonder what elements absorb the sliding to and fro when lens is not mounted.
And, when camera is turned off.
Besides, it couldn't focus properly, manually, meaning the results where poor.

But in any case, I'll see when they ship it back from Portugal.

 

Edited by Piero
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Not all red filters are the same, there will be a difference, if only a slight one depending on which red filter you are thinking about. Remember these are simulations, so the camera (or raw converter) will always apply the same processing to the image, but the filter is slightly different, even each time you put it on the lens, screwing it on just a little differently each time which will affect how the light is passed to or blocked from the sensor. But it will be close. If you want some fun, find a Pentax K1000 film body ~ $200 or so on the used market, a roll or two of Fujifilm Neopan 100 Acros II film ~ $15 or so a roll and some red filters ~ usually less than $50, some much less than $50, and try it. (All prices are in U.S. dollars.) note: color filters do get used on dslrs and mirrorless cameras but their use is usually limited to specialized settings or experiments because image processing tools can duplicate the view easily. 
    • I am curious to know if there is a difference between shooting the Fujifilm Film simulation Acros+R and Acros+Std with a Red filter on the lens. I don't have a red filter for  my lens otherwise I would do a test myself. Thank you for any information you can share.  
    • X100s: cannot get OVF. The switch on the front of the camera does nothing, yet it is supposed to allow switching from EVF to OVF and visa versa. This is the second X100s I've bought with the same problem. Advice please
    • Anna's, Oregon. X-H2s, Fuji 150-600.  

      Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

      Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

    • Jerryy - I think that issue is different. I've taken a lot of time looking into the subject detection problems related to that bug and its always the case that the camera focuses on something different - it doesn't create a completely blurred image like the most recent image from the OP
×
×
  • Create New...