Jump to content

X-Pro2 with 55-200 & 100-400


Guest

Recommended Posts

Hello,

I have just updated  my 2016 gallery with some photos I took yesterday in the Zoo. Well, I know - it is not quite a wildlife :-)

Unfortunately some of them were taken through the glass, what impacted the image quality.

 

I wonder what are your thoughts about the two lenses I mentioned - especially 55-200 in comparison with 50-140 f2.8 - is it worth to upgrade from the IQ point of view only?

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Very nice photos - I particularly like the one of the Lioness and the birds.

 

Fuji don't make any bad lenses - and your shots using the 55-200 are very sharp with nice contrast.

 

For me, the 50-140 is too big for a lens with limited range - although if I was a professional photographer - having a high quality WR f2.8 lens that I could leave on my camera for most purposes would be very attractive - but as an amateur I can't justify the cost or the weight.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...