Jump to content

Evening lens ?


siudar

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

wonder if anyone could help me decide on a lens to compliment my 16-55mm and 55-200mm.

 

Family holiday soon to US - LA, Disney, Vegas and Grand Canyon. Clearly most places covered by existing glass but am looking for a 3rd and final smaller and lighter lens for those times when taking a big one just won't be practical. Am thinking here evenings out, possibly Disney too etc. Trying to decide between 18, 27 and 35/2.

 

Thoughts ?

 

Thanks in advance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Having both 27 and 35f2 can say that 35mm without doubt has overall better quality and handling, it's one stop faster, quick and silent... but 27 has "unic" angle of view that let you be nearer and capture more context (18mm might be too wide). So i'll definitly keep these two in my bag.

 

27at2.8 This is where Pokemons are coming from...

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I know you didn't mention this lens, but what about the 23 1.4? It sits right in the middle of the focal lengths you mentioned, is a stop faster than any of the lenses you mentioned, and is IMHO the sweet spot for shooting everyday life (wide enough for most situations, but tight enough to still be versatile).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Because the sensor assembly is moved electrmagnetically. When there is no power it is essentially free moving.
    • Ahoy ye hearties! Hoist ye yon Jolly Roger and Cascade away. NGC 1502 The Jolly Roger Cluster:

      Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

      Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

      This is the equivalent of 43 minutes, 40 seconds of exposure. NGC 1502 is a neat little cluster located in the Camelopardalis Constellation. This region of space was thought to be fairly empty by early astronomers, but as you can see, there is a lot there. Kemble's Cascade (a.k.a. Kemble 1) is named for Father Lucian Kemble, a Canadian Franciscan friar who wrote about it to Walter Scott Houston, an author for the Sky And Telescope magazine. Houston named the asterism for Fr. Kemble and the name "stuck". NGC 1501 is the Oyster Nebula. A longer focal length telescope is needed to bring this one into good viewing range, but it is well worth the effort. NGC 1502: https://skyandtelescope.org/online-gallery/ngc-1502/ Camelopardalis Constellation: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Camelopardalis Kemble's Cascade (and NGC 1501: The Oyster Nebula): https://www.constellation-guide.com/kembles-cascade/ Arrrrrr Matey.
    • Looking for input; there are some decent deals and might want to take advantage to expand my lenses for my 100s already own: 110/2 32-64 35-70 100-200 + TC   Shooting mostly family shots, bringing my kit to capture family outings indoors and out. Tracking the 63/43 effective FLs on the two, but has anybody used both? Would the 55 (covered by two zooms right now) be redundant? Would the 80 be too similar in character to my 110 for portraiture?
    • See what I mean? Two instantaneous ads. Worthless.   
×
×
  • Create New...