Jump to content

Lomography $$


Guest welshkc

Recommended Posts

All film is expensive (compared to digital being free).

 

Lomography an art movement.

 

​If you want to create to create the lomo effect without the cost of buying camera, film and developing it. There are apps to download for smartphones, and there are Adobe Lightroom tutorials (on the web) to create the effect.

 

good luck

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lomography is about lo-tech tools more then it is the film.  Most of the companies I am buying film from are selling it cheaper anyway.  I can buy 100ft rolls of good film for about the same price I can buy a pro pack of Protra for.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest welshkc

It was really a comment about the Ebay sellers trying to get $8 a roll for expired film. The stick lomography on the description. I'm familiar with the technique just don't think it should be used to sell bad film.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to post
Share on other sites

If it is expired and the seller makes clear it is expired, then the buyer has enough information to make a reasonable decision. During the past century, it was not uncommon for camera stores to have a bin of expired film for sale. However, it was generally priced accordingly.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Posts

    • Because the sensor assembly is moved electrmagnetically. When there is no power it is essentially free moving.
    • Ahoy ye hearties! Hoist ye yon Jolly Roger and Cascade away. NGC 1502 The Jolly Roger Cluster:

      Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

      Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

      This is the equivalent of 43 minutes, 40 seconds of exposure. NGC 1502 is a neat little cluster located in the Camelopardalis Constellation. This region of space was thought to be fairly empty by early astronomers, but as you can see, there is a lot there. Kemble's Cascade (a.k.a. Kemble 1) is named for Father Lucian Kemble, a Canadian Franciscan friar who wrote about it to Walter Scott Houston, an author for the Sky And Telescope magazine. Houston named the asterism for Fr. Kemble and the name "stuck". NGC 1501 is the Oyster Nebula. A longer focal length telescope is needed to bring this one into good viewing range, but it is well worth the effort. NGC 1502: https://skyandtelescope.org/online-gallery/ngc-1502/ Camelopardalis Constellation: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Camelopardalis Kemble's Cascade (and NGC 1501: The Oyster Nebula): https://www.constellation-guide.com/kembles-cascade/ Arrrrrr Matey.
    • Looking for input; there are some decent deals and might want to take advantage to expand my lenses for my 100s already own: 110/2 32-64 35-70 100-200 + TC   Shooting mostly family shots, bringing my kit to capture family outings indoors and out. Tracking the 63/43 effective FLs on the two, but has anybody used both? Would the 55 (covered by two zooms right now) be redundant? Would the 80 be too similar in character to my 110 for portraiture?
    • See what I mean? Two instantaneous ads. Worthless.   
×
×
  • Create New...