Jump to content

X-T1/X-T10 and the Weather Sealing... just a Gimmick or a Must Have Feature?

Patrick FR

By Patrick FR
in Fuji X-T1 / Fuji X-T10

 Share

Recommended Posts

EHS Newbie

EHS

Posted
Posted

If it works, it is definitely not a gimmick. 

 

As somebody who is switching from SLR to mirrorless for the weight savings on backcountry excursions, weather sealing is huge. I've killed multiple canon lenses and one body (thankfully still under warranty) from rough treatment in the outdoors, and missed a lot of shots because I didn't want to pull my camera out of my bag in the rain. 

 

My dream X Pro2 is weather sealed, has in-body stabilization, and backside illumination. That combination would be killer, for me; every shot I want to get but don't is because of wet weather or low light. A bigger sensor would be great, too, but it's not worth having a heavier or less-durable body for me. I'm looking at you, Sony. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Sunglass Apprentice

Sunglass

Posted
Posted

I bought my first camera in 1986. None of the many cameras that followed her were weatherproof. I have taken pictures in three continents under the most varied weather conditions, and none of my cameras have ever stopped working because of rain, snow, freeze, or sand. If photographers have coped sans weatherproof since 1839, why should it become a "must-have" feature now? Not many photogs really need that feature, and there are all kinds of camera covers for those who need them.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Rod McD Newbie

Rod McD

Posted
Posted

I wouldn't buy an unsealed camera after the experience of losing two to water damage and a repair to sand grain entry to a lens.  Cameras are precision optical/electronic devices that are used outdoors and they're susceptible to damage by water and dust.  It doesn't take a lot of water, especially salt water, to ruin them.  They don't have to get flooded - a few drops under the top plate dials is enough to cause electronic malfunction and permanent damage.  It doesn't cost a lot to design and build sealing in from the outset.  I don't think there is any excuse for not sealing premium bodies and lenses.  It doesn't matter that some owners may not take advantage of the sealing.  For others, it's essential.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Trenton Talbot Rising Star

Trenton Talbot

Posted
Posted

You can start by asking: weather what, exactly? Freezing rain? Tsunami? Sandstorm? Tornado?…

 

By "weather sealing" manufacturers usually mean "more or less protected against a downpour, but absolutely no guarantee" – amazingly similar to "water resistant" watches. So most users perceive "weather sealing" as "water resistant" without thinking twice. And that's exactly what makes "weather sealing" a gimmick: no one ever bothered to rate a camera or lens using widely recognized standards such as IPX. Not even an IPX-1 (10 minutes of protection from dripping water, single direction). So basically when you choose a "weather resistant" something, you vote with your hard earned money for the continual existence of a salesy BS.

 

From where I'm standing, "weather sealing" is no more effective than a trash bag and a few pieces of gaff tape.

Link to post
Share on other sites
JLing Contributor

JLing

Posted
Posted

You can start by asking: weather what, exactly? Freezing rain? Tsunami? Sandstorm? Tornado?…

 

By "weather sealing" manufacturers usually mean "more or less protected against a downpour, but absolutely no guarantee" – amazingly similar to "water resistant" watches. So most users perceive "weather sealing" as "water resistant" without thinking twice. And that's exactly what makes "weather sealing" a gimmick: no one ever bothered to rate a camera or lens using widely recognized standards such as IPX. Not even an IPX-1 (10 minutes of protection from dripping water, single direction). So basically when you choose a "weather resistant" something, you vote with your hard earned money for the continual existence of a salesy BS.

 

From where I'm standing, "weather sealing" is no more effective than a trash bag and a few pieces of gaff tape.

Hi, Trenton I always enjoy your comments and opinions did you see the link I posted earlier in this topic? Definitely not a gimmick I would say. The owner of the vid claimed it worked without a problem afterwards.
Link to post
Share on other sites
Trenton Talbot Rising Star

Trenton Talbot

Posted
Posted

Hi, Trenton I always enjoy your comments and opinions did you see the link I posted earlier in this topic? Definitely not a gimmick I would say. The owner of the vid claimed it worked without a problem afterwards.

 

There'll always be some anecdotal evidence* to support both sides of the "weather sealing" dichotomy. Actually, that applies to any gimmick  :D

 

 

* It is best known as a "Person Who" fallacy. Not to be confused with Doctor Who :P 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Marc G. Collaborator

Marc G.

Posted
Posted

I've used my X-T1 under drizzle and light rain for hours and it worked and works flawlessly. Even the 10-24 survived a tropical rainstorm unprotected for 15 minutes.

 

After those partly involuntary "tests" I completely trust the X-T1 to be usable under any circumstances that happen to come upon me.

 

Certainly NOT a gimmick to me.

 

That said, I also used my Leica M9 under similar circumstances and it survived. That camera is not specified as being weather sealed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • mapoett
      X-s10 Fast shutting 20/30 fps crop ES

      By mapoett · Posted

      Hello. Thankyou,now Is all more clear: I have take some time in your link. Let tell you. I has totaly forget this machine have "compress picture option" and not Only "compress lossless" anyway not change the experiment. RAW  and this last two format look like same result about Number of recording picture. Can tell all results in this: in raw you can make 17 pictures for second. Is wrong. Is about One single Press and wait buffer. Full 30/20/10/8 not change. After 17 Need Press again. You not can Press before "redgreen light recording Is on".   With preshot you can have 25  are more 7 pictures . The story change Only in jpg shot only. In jpg at 30 you have 30 picture but redgreen light off very Fast so you can shot very quicly. At 20 shot Is about start look like infinite shot. 60. So the best performance are this last One  about Speed and recording picture after camera working witout big limit. I want take a shot about Italy cyclet Just for passion. I think i Will use this last setting.  After Need check when battery not are full change and ambient temp.  Anyway my cam look like exactly specific about you link. Im Happy my cam working perfectly.
    • jerryy
      Hello from Iowa

      By jerryy · Posted

      I do not use Flickr, so I do not know what their BB code is. All I did was copy the second link you provided, (starting at https: and ending at  _k.jpg — leave off the [img] and [/img] tags) and pasted it into the message. After a moment, a message popped up asking if I wanted to paste it as the image or as a plain link. I did this twice, the first time I had it paste in as the image and the second time as a link. Nothing fancy or tricky.
    • FrankWeiser
      Hello from Iowa

      By FrankWeiser · Posted

      So do I just copy the BB code from flickr and paste it anywhere on the page like other forums or is there some other trick I need to perform to get it to post?
    • JovialLich
      X Raw Studio Doesn't Create Drive for Camera When Connected

      By JovialLich · Posted

      All software is the latest between camera and app. All settings are correct on camera. I have both lossless and uncompressed RAW files on the card in the camera. I have been up and down every reddit thread to no avail and am losing my mind… I’m doing all of the right things. It even sees my camera. It just doesn’t create the “drive” for it (see attached image screenshot).  Please Help! 

      Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

      Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

    • grizzski
      X-T30 II Eye Sensor + LCD Image Display viewmode not working

      By grizzski · Posted

      Not sure how to delete threads, but I figured out what was wrong. In short, I was partially misunderstanding the view-mode's function. Also, the "+LCD Image Display" part requires that you have the Image Disp. setting set to anything but Off. Then it will display your last image on the LCD. If it's off, it's behavior will be exactly like the plain Eye Sensor setting.
×
×
  • Create New...