Jump to content

Bag/pannier to take cameras on a bicycle?


Recommended Posts

I don't generally carry the Fuji when cycling, but a smaller Olympus Em-10 (and before that a really compact Sony Nex-7 plus a Sigma 35 Art).

 

The Olympus plus its sharp 14-42 kit zoom (28-85mm eq.) and a Panasonic 35-100 (70-200 eq.) fit (barely, a Panasonic GM5 plus the 12-32 pancake would be a better choice) into a top tube bag like this one:

 

http://www.roswheel.eu/phonebag/

 

As an added bonus I can keep my phone with the GPS running in the central pocket to see where I'm going.

 

If I'm carrying more stuff or the Fuji kit:

- for one day rides, I just strap a small Lowepro fannypack on the rear rack; in that I can carry one camera and up to 3/4 lenses

- for tours I stick all the kit in an handlebar bag or in the pannier farthest from traffic (so the right one unless you live in the UK or the like, where they drive on the left)

 

If at all possible I avoid though putting the camera:

- in a backpack, because you never know when you're gonna kiss the asphalt, and because on the uphills that here range generally from 15 to 24% I sweat like a race horse... ;)

- or in the left side pannier, because you never know when some idiot driver is gonna smack the panniers with his car trying to pass you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Depends on how much kit you actually want to take with you.

 

When cycling either for the day or touring, I go as lightweight as possible and therefore carry my X-T10 with an XF27mm (or XF18mm) attached in a Thinktank Mirrorless Mover 5 on my waist belt. The camera is protected from 'road shocks' (well as much as I am!) and is easily accessible.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Ahoy ye hearties! Hoist ye yon Jolly Roger and Cascade away. NGC 1502 The Jolly Roger Cluster:

      Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

      Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

      This is the equivalent of 43 minutes, 40 seconds of exposure. NGC 1502 is a neat little cluster located in the Camelopardalis Constellation. This region of space was thought to be fairly empty by early astronomers, but as you can see, there is a lot there. Kemble's Cascade (a.k.a. Kemble 1) is named for Father Lucian Kemble, a Canadian Franciscan friar who wrote about it to Walter Scott Houston, an author for the Sky And Telescope magazine. Houston named the asterism for Fr. Kemble and the name "stuck". NGC 1501 is the Oyster Nebula. A longer focal length telescope is needed to bring this one into good viewing range, but it is well worth the effort. NGC 1502: https://skyandtelescope.org/online-gallery/ngc-1502/ Camelopardalis Constellation: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Camelopardalis Kemble's Cascade (and NGC 1501: The Oyster Nebula): https://www.constellation-guide.com/kembles-cascade/ Arrrrrr Matey.
    • Looking for input; there are some decent deals and might want to take advantage to expand my lenses for my 100s already own: 110/2 32-64 35-70 100-200 + TC   Shooting mostly family shots, bringing my kit to capture family outings indoors and out. Tracking the 63/43 effective FLs on the two, but has anybody used both? Would the 55 (covered by two zooms right now) be redundant? Would the 80 be too similar in character to my 110 for portraiture?
    • See what I mean? Two instantaneous ads. Worthless.   
    • What's the deal Fuji X Forum? I'm noticing there are seldom replies to any topics - except for advertisements posted as replies. Really lame. Anyone else noticing the only reply they receive to a question is an advert?  🤠 fotomatt in Colorado  
×
×
  • Create New...