Jump to content

Fuji and Red Dot Flare issue


Recommended Posts

Sorry but you're being very very ignorant. Frankly, i'm wondering what you're shooting anyway, or at what level. Shooting into the sun is absolutely common practice for a variety of professional photography. Landscape, Outdoors, Tourism ... oh my. do i have to explain it? Never seen any commercials of this sort? Whereas regarding the brands, say Canon vs Fuji: the canon 17mm TSE for instance, creates a very clean and beautiful sun "star". Incomparable to the Fuji 10-24. Now i landed in this thread, because my 10-24 on the XT-2 creates lots of colorful dots, pretty bad. In very obvious repeating patterns. Nothing like may Canon 16-35 or 17. You know what? Ask around stock agencies or photogs, and they will tell you that "sun in the photo" sells A LOT better for certain motifs. Not to folks like you, of course. But please stop blathering. Dont ridicule photographers that do shoot into the sun!

Show us your stuff huck222. We all try to contribute each in our own way, please demonstrate what you mean and since you used the work Professional make it at that level.

Link to post
Share on other sites

well, I may be “ very ignorant" but I never said that people don’t or shouldn’t shoot " in the sun” ( against the sun). 

 

I was saying that IF you chose to shoot against the sun THEN you can reasonably expect that there will be some flare.

 

But please, show us your great accomplishments in this or any other department.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

well, I may be “ very ignorant" but I never said that people don’t or shouldn’t shoot " in the sun” ( against the sun).

I was saying that IF you chose to shoot against the sun THEN you can reasonably expect that there will be some flare.

Well, you were criticizing him harshly for shooting against the sun, saying it's not the problem of the camera/lens, but the photographer. Right? Well, it think that is totally wrong.

Ok guys, sorry for the late follow up. Don't get me wrong, i am not talking about MY work, but about the world of photography out there, where the sun IN a picture is very very common and attractive. And the Fuji System has some issues with it. Mostly it seems, because of reflections between back lens and sensor. Here's a picture taken with my Canon. Any problems there, Milandro? I dont see any. Some flare is okay or beautiful. Some taken with Canon are worse, yes, but Fuji is a different world. That's the point of this thread now isn't it?

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Edited by huck222
Link to post
Share on other sites

Regarding Fuji, i found that a aperture not smaller than f/9 is best, avoiding that flare grid pattern. Stopped down beyond f/11, the ugly grid shows more or less. Which is bothering, because with landscapes apertures smaller than f9 are pretty common. See attached comparison. In this instance even at f22 its kinda okay-ish, but its definatly something not to be ignored.

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

yet another misreading of my post.

 

I don’t have problems with shooting against the sun. I know It might give me all sorts of problems.

 

What I said is that IF you shoot against the sun you already know that may have problems  and shouldn’t be surprised if you do come across any problem.

Link to post
Share on other sites

yet another misreading of my post.

I don’t have problems with shooting against the sun. I know It might give me all sorts of problems.

What I said is that IF you shoot against the sun you already know that may have problems  and shouldn’t be surprised if you do come across any problem.

Well now, that's funny. What was that "best of luck with your other cameras? I've shown you some "luck" with Canon, a DSLR that is, without that grid pattern flare, caused by sensor reflections it seems (because what sort of lens could produce such a grid?), which you do not believe. The sun i the frame, was for you "a freak way to photograph". So maybe my "misreading" was caused by your misspelling. But i do appreciate the entirely new tone and content of what you are saying now. =)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have no new tone, I said this before in the same terms.

 

 

 

 

My point was and has always been that if you shoot against the sun you may have problems (all sorts of whether sensor or lens induced) and shouldn’t be surprised if you do,

 

I don’t think that I’ve made I made any “ spelling” mistake. I think that all the words that I have used were spelled correctly.

 

Maybe you refer to my ideas that you may or may not agree with.

 

 

 

Please read the definition of each word or verb.

 

spelling |ˈspɛlɪŋ

noun [ mass noun ] the process or activity of writing or naming the letters of a word. the books and spelling in my class were too simple.• count noun ] the way a word is spelled: the spelling of his name was influenced by French.• person's ability to spell words: her spelling was deplorable.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

You’ve misread me because of a improper interpretation of my words ( you may say that I haven’t expressed myself well, but that would be a first...)

 

 

Anyway , I too shoot against the sun, occasionally, I don’t get upset if something strange happen and work with it not against it.

 

 

 

misread |mɪsˈriːd

verb (past and past participlemisread |-ˈrɛdwith obj. ] read (a piece of text) wrongly. perhaps she'd misread the note and got the time wrong. (as noun misreading:  he withdrew an allegation based on his misreading of a newspaper article.

 

 • judge or interpret (a situation or a person's manner or behaviour) incorrectly: had she been completely misreading his intentions? 

 

 

 

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Edited by milandro
Link to post
Share on other sites

right, you have all the reality you WANT :) . Some call it "alternative facts" :)

It's kinda hard to discuss a problem here, without reading posts. Well then, lets focus on photography again. And specific technical answers.

Edited by huck222
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Hello. Thankyou,now Is all more clear: I have take some time in you link. Let tell you.i was totaly forget this machine have "compress picture option" and not Only "compress lossless" anyway not change the experiment. RAW  and this last two format look like same result about Number of recording picture. Can tell alll results in this: in raw you can make 17 pictures for second.Is wrong.Is about One single Press and wait buffer. Full 30/20/10/8 not change. After 17 Need Press again. You not can Press before "redgreen light recording Is on"   With preshot you can have 25  are more 7 pictures  The story change Only in jpg shot only. In jpg at 30 you have 30 picture but redgreen light off very Fast so you can shot very quicly. At 20 shot Is about start look like infinite shot. 60   So the best performance are this last One  about Speed and recording picture after camera working witout big limit I want take a shot about Italy cyclet Just for passion. I think i Will use this last setting.  After Need check when battery not are full change and ambient temp.  Anyway my cam look like exactly specific about you link. Im Happy my cam working perfectly 
    • I do not use Flickr, so I do not know what their BB code is. All I did was copy the second link you provided, (starting at https: and ending at  _k.jpg — leave off the [img] and [/img] tags) and pasted it into the message. After a moment, a message popped up asking if I wanted to paste it as the image or as a plain link. I did this twice, the first time I had it paste in as the image and the second time as a link. Nothing fancy or tricky.
    • So do I just copy the BB code from flickr and paste it anywhere on the page like other forums or is there some other trick I need to perform to get it to post?
    • All software is the latest between camera and app. All settings are correct on camera. I have both lossless and uncompressed RAW files on the card in the camera. I have been up and down every reddit thread to no avail and am losing my mind… I’m doing all of the right things. It even sees my camera. It just doesn’t create the “drive” for it (see attached image screenshot).  Please Help! 

      Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

      Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

    • Not sure how to delete threads, but I figured out what was wrong. In short, I was partially misunderstanding the view-mode's function. Also, the "+LCD Image Display" part requires that you have the Image Disp. setting set to anything but Off. Then it will display your last image on the LCD. If it's off, it's behavior will be exactly like the plain Eye Sensor setting.
×
×
  • Create New...