Jump to content

Manual focus ring not working


John Gray

Recommended Posts

I'm new to Fuji.   I have the X-T5 with a 16-80mm lens.

When I set it to Manual focus, the lens ring does absolutely nothing.  I've gone through the settings, manual, watched video after video and I can't figure out why it's not working.

Is there something else to do other than switch to Manual focus to get the ring to work?  I must be missing something obvious.

Thanks

Edited by John Gray
Link to post
Share on other sites

My single issue with Fuji menus is  there are multiple settings which control singular functions such as MF. It looks as if you know where to check, i.e. MF assist, AF + MF, the MSC dial etc. One thing I have found is fat fingering the lower SS dial to movie instead of stills or the lower iso dial to CL.  I hope you figure it out, it's probably simple, usually is.  Unless you missed one of the things I listed above, lol.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Here are a few things you could check that might be causing the issue:

  1. Camera Mode: Ensure the camera itself is in Manual mode, not just the lens. Sometimes, even if you switch your lens to Manual, if the camera is in an auto mode, it may override manual focusing.

  2. Focus Mode Selector: Make sure the focus mode selector on the front of the camera is set to "M" for manual.

  3. Focus Ring Direction: In the X-T5's settings, there's an option to change the direction of the manual focus ring. You might've accidentally reversed it, causing confusion. You can check it under Menu > AF/MF Setting > Focus Ring Operation.

  4. Function of the Lens Ring: Sometimes, the lens ring might be set to control another function like aperture or zoom, and not focus. Confirm this under the Menu > Button/Dial Setting > Ring Function Setting.

  5. Firmware Update: Make sure both your camera and lens have the latest firmware updates. Occasionally, these issues can be solved with an update. You can check for updates on Fujifilm's official site.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Because the sensor assembly is moved electrmagnetically. When there is no power it is essentially free moving.
    • Ahoy ye hearties! Hoist ye yon Jolly Roger and Cascade away. NGC 1502 The Jolly Roger Cluster:

      Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

      Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

      This is the equivalent of 43 minutes, 40 seconds of exposure. NGC 1502 is a neat little cluster located in the Camelopardalis Constellation. This region of space was thought to be fairly empty by early astronomers, but as you can see, there is a lot there. Kemble's Cascade (a.k.a. Kemble 1) is named for Father Lucian Kemble, a Canadian Franciscan friar who wrote about it to Walter Scott Houston, an author for the Sky And Telescope magazine. Houston named the asterism for Fr. Kemble and the name "stuck". NGC 1501 is the Oyster Nebula. A longer focal length telescope is needed to bring this one into good viewing range, but it is well worth the effort. NGC 1502: https://skyandtelescope.org/online-gallery/ngc-1502/ Camelopardalis Constellation: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Camelopardalis Kemble's Cascade (and NGC 1501: The Oyster Nebula): https://www.constellation-guide.com/kembles-cascade/ Arrrrrr Matey.
    • Looking for input; there are some decent deals and might want to take advantage to expand my lenses for my 100s already own: 110/2 32-64 35-70 100-200 + TC   Shooting mostly family shots, bringing my kit to capture family outings indoors and out. Tracking the 63/43 effective FLs on the two, but has anybody used both? Would the 55 (covered by two zooms right now) be redundant? Would the 80 be too similar in character to my 110 for portraiture?
    • See what I mean? Two instantaneous ads. Worthless.   
×
×
  • Create New...