Jump to content

Lens or camera choice


bruno77m

Recommended Posts

Guest welshkc

I grabbed the 18-135 and now leave everything else at home. It is a bit slow for really low light but the ISO and OIS more than make up the diff.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to post
Share on other sites

First you should think about why you want a new lens, what you would use it for, and why you can't do it with those you already have. When you found answers to those questions and you come to the conclusion that you need a new lens it's usually pretty easy to find the right one, especially in the Fuji system.
 
Until then I recommend the 100-400, it's a great lens and will expand your spectrum.
 
About XF 23 F1.4 R vs. X100T: see Zack Arias' blog post about Fuji lenses, somewhere in the lower part of the posting. It's mainly about having a second body as backup, or for whatever reason.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Depends what you're photographing. You've got an very-wide, a medium, and a short telephoto prime, and then you've got the zoom for speed or as a back up or whatever you consider the zoom to be. You could fill out the wide end a bit with a 16mm, because there's quite a gap from 12mm to 35mm, or you could expand your reach and go for something like the 90mm or 50-140. Really depends what you shoot and which you'll get more use from.

As far as the 23mm vs x100T goes, that just depends on whether you think you'll get tired of swapping lenses, and how sharp you expect 'wide open' to be. The 23mm f/1.4 is sharper at f/2 than the X100S/T lens is at f/2, and of course you can open it up an extra stop on top. I think of the X100S/T as being an f/2.8 camera, because f/2 is quite soft. But it is really convenient to have that focal length on its own dedicated body, with no lens swapping and the leaf shutter. There's no clear, obvious winner out of those two. One is technically higher-quality, the other is far more convenient.

But if you're considering the 23mm, I'd think hard about the 16mm. That will bridge the gap between the 12mm and 35mm a bit more evenly. (The 16mm angle of view is basically halfway betwen the two; the 23mm is closer in view to the 35mm, obviously.)

The only lens mentioned which I'd advise against, almost regardless of what you shoot, is the 100-400. It's a fine lens, but unless you're trying to photograph wildlife or spy on celebrities, it's a bit pointless. Equivalent 152-408mm is real long. That's a tight headshot at the widest end and rare bird-hunting at the long end. It would expand your lens range more than any other lens, sure, but if you mostly shoot landscape, or street, or weddings, or portrait, sports, events... well, pretty much anything normal, then it's just going to be a big, heavy lump in your camera bag.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I manly shoot landscape, architecture, concerts, cars and peoples and i shoot a lot in low light.

Just look in lightroom of which focal i use most when i use my 18-55. It's 18mm and 55mm. Almost no photos in between...so i think i don't need a 23mm...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sounds like the 100-400 would definitely not be for you. And yeah, 23mm is kinda in between. A lot of people only really shoot at the longest or widest ends of their zoom range. 

So, I'd consider the 16mm. It's f/1.4 so you've got low light covered, it's close to the wide end of that zoom range—you've already got the 56 for the long end—and it's pretty distortion-free, compared to most similar wide-angle lenses, so it's pretty good for architecture and casual/environmental portraits. (Of course you'd ever use it for a formal headshot, obviously.)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I manly shoot landscape, architecture, concerts, cars and peoples and i shoot a lot in low light.

Just look in lightroom of which focal i use most when i use my 18-55. It's 18mm and 55mm. Almost no photos in between...so i think i don't need a 23mm...

 

This could also have to do with not being good at exploiting the opportunities of a zoom. I am like that too. I do not enjoy zooming with that lens. I have no idea if I would enjoy it with another zoom. It might in part be a tactile thing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Based on your shooting list, I also recommend the 16mm f/1.4.

 

If you want a second camera, the X70 is worth a look. No viewfinder, but a tilt screen and a 28mm in a tiny package. No need to choose bodies; you'd bring both. 

 

Good luck with your decision. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Hi all,

I have a X-T1 with the 18-55, 56 1.2, summicron 35 and samyang 12. For what lens would you go next ?

I'm actually thinking about the 23 1.4 or the X100T.

What do you think ?

Thanks

 

Except for the X100T reference this is not a "Fuji Question".  One sees the same question on UglyHedgehog almost daily except pertaining to Nikon or Canon.  

Here is my suggestion:  If you use Lightroom or some other image file management software that let's you view and maybe even sort by EXIF data take a look to see what local lengths predominate among the images you have made. If you are zooming all the way out to 55mm with the 18-55 (like 50%) chances are you want a longer focal length.  If 50% of you5 images are between 30mm and 40mm well you NEED a 35mm prime.  Tec, etc.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Except for the X100T reference this is not a "Fuji Question".  One sees the same question on UglyHedgehog almost daily except pertaining to Nikon or Canon.  

Here is my suggestion:  If you use Lightroom or some other image file management software that let's you view and maybe even sort by EXIF data take a look to see what local lengths predominate among the images you have made. If you are zooming all the way out to 55mm with the 18-55 (like 50%) chances are you want a longer focal length.  If 50% of you5 images are between 30mm and 40mm well you NEED a 35mm prime.  Tec, etc.

And the 23mm 1.4 it's not Fuji related ?

Yes I looked in Lightroom. With the 18-55 almost all photos are 18mm or 55mm

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Good center sharpness at f/2.8, bad in the corners. But if you use that "shallow" depth of field, your corners don't have to be sharp most of the time anyway. Best center sharpness between f/4 and f/5.6, still good at f/8. Corner sharpness maxes out between f/5.6 and f/8. f/8 also seems to be the best compromise between depth of field, center sharpness and corner sharpness for landscape, city or other architectural stuff where you need a normal field of view. Mine is sharper than my 18-55. Enough with sharpness. If you're used to the image stabilization of your two zooms, you might get blurred images in the first weeks until you adapt to holding the camera steady or using faster shutter speeds. I don't see any real problems with chromatic aberrations, distortions, coma, purple fringing etc. It's a bit susceptible to shooting against the sun or other bright light sources.

Fast but noisy autofocus motor which moves the inner lens barrel out of the lens (~5 mm) for close focusing, really small and light, smooth running but grippy focus ring, all plastic exterior, but good build quality. Aperture is also pretty audible with my sample. It was not clear to me when I bought it, but it's definitely not just a toy, it is a serious small lens, and that's why it's not as cheap as other manufacturer's pancakes.

Edited by quincy
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Just ordered the 27mm pancake, for my x-t10, also have 18-55 and 50-230 but am looking for ultimate portability, I hope I wont be disappointed with the image quality, any thoughts?

I recently got the 27mm pancake to add to the 18mm and 18-55mm. The 27mm is simply astounding, a very useful focal length, tremendously sharp, makes the camera SO compact and light. I'm getting tons of use out of it.  It may be the cheap one in the XF collection, but its performance is stellar. 

 

B

Link to post
Share on other sites

The 27mm is a great performer. I sold it for three reasons; too clinical rendering, slightly longer than I wanted, and the lack of an aperture ring. The third reason is more a slight nuisance than a real issue.

Definite pros of the 27mm are that the lens is really sharp, and that it's nicely small.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Looking more like the next Fuji camera we see will be an X-T50 but it is still a rumor and no specs have been published.
    • Hey guys, The shutter on/off button switch may be loose on mine. After turning camera on and pressing the shutter/holding close to the area, the camera will turn off and say 'sensor cleaning'. This doesn't happen if I'm shooting via touch screen at all. Everything else is functional. Anyone else experience this before? Would love a much cheaper fix since Fuji Canada just quoted me $700 CAD to fix it, and considering everything else is functional except that part I'm not even sure why MPMB Main Board parts is being replaced😕 I got no explanation from them either.
    • As far as I know the firmware is not country specific. Are you sure that the filename has not been changed ( I am told this can happen with mac os). That's the only thing I can think of.
    • My x-t5 does not exhibit the focusing switch behaviour as you report it, so that is very strange and indicative of a fault. It does not matter whether the flash is attached or not. Once you set the camera for your studio flash, say 1/250th at f5.6, the camera, which is showing you what you will get at that exposure without the flash, will show a black screen unless the ambient light is brighter than what you would typically get indoors. That is why, as Jerry says, you have to set preview exp/wb to off. I have set a button for this.
    • I connected to FRAME.IO a while back and it works fine, but the camera wouldn't connect to the internet all of a sudden today and would get stuck on the reset screen, including initializing and even switching USB Connection mode. Is anyone else experiencing the same thing?
×
×
  • Create New...