Jump to content

Filter Sets for X-Lenses


Toon

Recommended Posts

Do any of you have comparison samples of the ND filters you have making sure the white balance is set the same, only letting the shutter speed vary?

 

If you mean, have any the shots in my port had the colour balance altered to bring it in line with the opposing half, then no. The WB for the sky is the same for the ground, i.e. the only effect the filter has is to restrain the amount of light. Personally, I would use any filter that altered the actual colour. When processing 100's - 1000's of shots a month you need to be able to get through the work as quickly as possible. Having to balance WB between sky and land would make it more cost efficient to buy Lee Filters due to time saved.

 

I don't have actual examples of a shot with and without filters.... if I notice a cast I don't use them, if I don't, I do :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is a review that compares many 10-stop circular ND filters for cast and sharpness.  Now, I recognize that many here are talking about drop-in filters and holders, but if you want just a straight ND filter and don't want the size and hassle of the holder, circular filters are a viable option.  Breakthrough Photography's X3 filter came out on top.

 

http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/10-Stop-Neutral-Density-Filter.aspx

Link to post
Share on other sites

i use the hitech system as well, some grad nd and a 6 stop. for the 10 stop i also went for the haida which in fact works perfectly. as someone already mentioned, i removed one of the layers on the filter holder. i also turned around the screws and cut about one cm from each of them. now they perfectly fit into my filter pouch. the results absolutely fit my needs.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've noticed that the Lee Seven5 Polarizer gives a little vignettin when used together with the 18-135mm zoom lens at 18mm. When zooming in just a little bit towards 23mm it's gone. The 18-135 lens has a 67mm filter diameter. Maybe in future I wanted buy a wider lens so I was wondering which lens will not be affected by vignettin, the 10-24 mm zoom with a filter diameter of 72mm or the 14mm with a filter diameter of 58mm. My guess is that the 10-24 will give a lot vignettin in at least the ultra wide focal lengths due to the wider diameter. And that the 14m maybe don't give any vignettin at all? I'm I correct?

For the 10-24mm you will need the Lee 100 system. And you better use the 72mm wide angle adapter ring.

 

Lee Filters write in their Knowlege Base about it:

http://leefilters.uservoice.com/knowledgebase/articles/353605-fuji-x-10-24mm

Link to post
Share on other sites

Allow me to jump on the boat and as a question about filters.

 

I am by no means a landscape photographer but I got the itch to give a try. Now considering the prices of either Lee or HiTech filters, that sounds like quite a heavy investment for something I might not like.

 

That being said, a friend from Taiwan advised me to take a look at Kood filters, he got them last time he went to UK and they are around 22ish £ per 84mm filters, they have pretty much everything aside the equivalent of Lee's big stopper.

 

Does anyone around has any experience with Kood ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Ahoy ye hearties! Hoist ye yon Jolly Roger and Cascade away. NGC 1502 The Jolly Roger Cluster:

      Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

      Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

      This is the equivalent of 43 minutes, 40 seconds of exposure. NGC 1502 is a neat little cluster located in the Camelopardalis Constellation. This region of space was thought to be fairly empty by early astronomers, but as you can see, there is a lot there. Kemble's Cascade (a.k.a. Kemble 1) is named for Father Lucian Kemble, a Canadian Franciscan friar who wrote about it to Walter Scott Houston, an author for the Sky And Telescope magazine. Houston named the asterism for Fr. Kemble and the name "stuck". NGC 1501 is the Oyster Nebula. A longer focal length telescope is needed to bring this one into good viewing range, but it is well worth the effort. NGC 1502: https://skyandtelescope.org/online-gallery/ngc-1502/ Camelopardalis Constellation: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Camelopardalis Kemble's Cascade (and NGC 1501: The Oyster Nebula): https://www.constellation-guide.com/kembles-cascade/ Arrrrrr Matey.
    • Looking for input; there are some decent deals and might want to take advantage to expand my lenses for my 100s already own: 110/2 32-64 35-70 100-200 + TC   Shooting mostly family shots, bringing my kit to capture family outings indoors and out. Tracking the 63/43 effective FLs on the two, but has anybody used both? Would the 55 (covered by two zooms right now) be redundant? Would the 80 be too similar in character to my 110 for portraiture?
    • See what I mean? Two instantaneous ads. Worthless.   
    • What's the deal Fuji X Forum? I'm noticing there are seldom replies to any topics - except for advertisements posted as replies. Really lame. Anyone else noticing the only reply they receive to a question is an advert?  🤠 fotomatt in Colorado  
×
×
  • Create New...