Jump to content

“Soap-bubble bokeh” Trioplan F2,8/100mm of Meyer-Optik-Görlitz for Fuji X coming in December for €1,400


Patrick FR

Recommended Posts

We talked about the comeback of Meyer-Optik Görlitz back in February. Now we have additional information about the Trioplan 100mmF2.8: It will ship in December and cost €1,400

The lens is said to have a very smooth “soap bubble” bokeh.

http://www.fujirumors.com/soap-bubble-bokeh-trioplan-f28100mm-of-meyer-optik-gorlitz-for-fuji-x-coming-in-december-for-e1400/

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, all the more reason, for those into these one-trick ponies, to scour the street markets, jumble or car-booth sales and charity or thrift shops.

 

There are lots and lots and lots of undiscovered an unloved old lenses out there, some in a more than decent state ( although I doubt that a little fungus would matter much for the end results of any such lens) sold at a pittance because the sellers are, not yet, aware, of the potential market.

 

Happy hunting!  B)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Happy hunting!  B)

 

Indeed. Where's the fun without the hunt ! Classics should have lived, you can't just make a 'new' classic.

 

At least, not when it's unreasonably priced and boring! The Petzval did pretty well for a good price and you actually get something like a collectors edition. The difference here between doing it for the money, or because they love optics, is too obvious. People won't fall for it that easily, Meyer!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, it all depends if any pixel guru out there would declare this a holy trinity ( it is a triplet after all!) or not.

 

It is pretty amazing what collective compulsive purchasing behaviors can actually do.

 

I am gonna try to find one of the old ones and sell it to the people who will be prepared to pay good money for it.

 

Not because I want to take advantage of the fools :rolleyes:   but rather more in the spirit of “ Ask, and it will be given to you!”  ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Posts

    • Because the sensor assembly is moved electrmagnetically. When there is no power it is essentially free moving.
    • Ahoy ye hearties! Hoist ye yon Jolly Roger and Cascade away. NGC 1502 The Jolly Roger Cluster:

      Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

      Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

      This is the equivalent of 43 minutes, 40 seconds of exposure. NGC 1502 is a neat little cluster located in the Camelopardalis Constellation. This region of space was thought to be fairly empty by early astronomers, but as you can see, there is a lot there. Kemble's Cascade (a.k.a. Kemble 1) is named for Father Lucian Kemble, a Canadian Franciscan friar who wrote about it to Walter Scott Houston, an author for the Sky And Telescope magazine. Houston named the asterism for Fr. Kemble and the name "stuck". NGC 1501 is the Oyster Nebula. A longer focal length telescope is needed to bring this one into good viewing range, but it is well worth the effort. NGC 1502: https://skyandtelescope.org/online-gallery/ngc-1502/ Camelopardalis Constellation: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Camelopardalis Kemble's Cascade (and NGC 1501: The Oyster Nebula): https://www.constellation-guide.com/kembles-cascade/ Arrrrrr Matey.
    • Looking for input; there are some decent deals and might want to take advantage to expand my lenses for my 100s already own: 110/2 32-64 35-70 100-200 + TC   Shooting mostly family shots, bringing my kit to capture family outings indoors and out. Tracking the 63/43 effective FLs on the two, but has anybody used both? Would the 55 (covered by two zooms right now) be redundant? Would the 80 be too similar in character to my 110 for portraiture?
    • See what I mean? Two instantaneous ads. Worthless.   
×
×
  • Create New...